Responding to Javed Ahmad Ghamidi and his all Students and Followers

We are agreed with some preaching of Mr. Ghamidi and his Students but we also disagree with them on several topics. In this page, we will post only those comments which are in fact rebuttal to Mr. Ghamadi and his students. We do not have any personal problem with lovely Mr. Ghamidi nor with his followers and students. This is pure academic discussion. It depends on reader to judge what is truth and what is not truth. We request reader to visit our main content page where we have discussed about 100 important topics in depth rationally. We are not blind followers, and Noble Quran repeatedly forbids blind following 9:31, 2:170, 43:22, 31:21, 67:10, 7:179, 22:46, 8:22, 17:36, 33:67, 3:80, 39:18, 12:2 and ordains us to use reason. It is a big blunder to follow Oldi Imams blindly. According to our unbiased Research, vast majority of Oldi-Imams from year 722 CE onward were even more Ignorant than laptop Mullahs of today. Glorious Quran which is Truth of all truths is clear, and is the final verdict. So, after landing of Quran, all matters of Deen al-Islam must be judged only in the light of Noble Quran which is Complete and Mufassal 6:114, 16:89. Our approach is always logical and rational and our arguments are substantiated with solid references. Sometime, approach of Mr. Ghamidi becomes unsound, and its reason is: he indeed follows his South Asian typical Mullah teachers and some oldi-Jaahil Imams like Shafi’i blindly; and a Blind Follower can never be a Truthful Scholar even if he lives for 100 years. Just read these words of Abu Hanifa but take care, your daughters or sisters are not nearby.اس پرانے ویڈیو میں جو مثال غامدی صاحب نے روزوں کے متعلق دی ہے بالکل وہ کسی ایت کے منسوخ ہونے کا ثبوت نہیں ہے۔ اس وقت کے، اسلام کے ٹاپ پروفیسرز جیسے کہ ڈاکٹر پروفیسر یاسر عودہ ہے نے بھی لکھا ہے کہ اس نے پورے حدیث لٹریچر کی تحقیق کی ہے اور اس کو ایک حدیث بھی صحیح نہیں ملی جو قران کی کسی ایت کے منسوخ ہونے کی بات کرتی ہو۔ یہ ساری کارستانی ان جاہل سنی اماموں کی ہے جو صحابہ کے بہت بعد میں وارد ہوئے۔ ایت ۲:۱۰٦ کو اگر ایت ۲:۱۰۵ کے ساتھ ملا کر سمجھا جائے تو بات صاف ہو جاتی ہے کہ ان ایات میں، پرانی کتابوں کی شریعت کی منسوخی کی بات ہو رہی ہے۔ غامدی صاحب کی پرابلم یہ ہے کہ وہ اپنے جاہل استادوں امین اصلاحی اور فراہی کو پغمبر سمجھ کر ان کی جہالت کو بھی اندھوں کی طرح فالو کرتے ہیں۔ چونکہ جاہل امین اصلاحی نے اپنی کتاب تدبر-قران میں لکھ دیا ہے کہ قران اپنی ایات منسوخ کرتا ہے تو اصلاحی کے یہ توہین-قران کے الفاظ، غامدی صاحب کے لیے حدیث بن گئے ہیں۔ حالانکہ، گو اصلاحی اور فراہی دوسرے جنوبی ایشیا کے ملاؤں سے قدرے بہتر تھے مگر اس کا مطلب یہ نہیں کہ وہ دونوں فرشتے تھے اور انہوں نے غلطیاں نہیں کیں۔ قران تو بتاتا ہے بحثیت انسان، نبیوں سے بھی غلطیاں ہوئیں ۴۸:۲

ایک منطقی اور راشنل نقطہ یہ ہے کہ اگر قران-الحکیم کی کچھ ایات منسوخ ہوتیں تو نبی، ان ایات کی فکس تعداد صحابہ کو بتاتے۔ مگر کوئی سنی انفیڈل امام کہتا ہے کہ قران کی ۲۱۳ ایات منسوخ ہیں تو کوئی کہتا ہے کہ صرف پانچ منسوخ ہیں۔ صاف پتہ چلتا ہے کہ ان جاہل اماموں نے قران کے ساتھ کھلواڑ کیا ہے۔ جعفر نحاس لکھتا ہے کہ ۱۳۳ ایات منسوخ ہیں۔ مصری مولوی سیوطی لکھتا ہے کہ ۲۲ منسوخ ہیں۔ ابن الجوازی لکھتا ہے کہ ۲۴۷ منسوخ ہیں۔ دجال ابن سلامہ لکھتا ہے کہ ۲۱۳ ایات منسوخ ہیں۔ یہ لسٹ لمبی ہے۔ اور شاہ ولی-اللہ دہلوی لکھتا ہے ۵ ایات منسوخ ہیں۔ ایک انسان جس کا دماغ دس فیصد بھی صحیح کام کر رہا ہو ان اعداد-و-شمار سے سمجھ سکتا ہے۔ یہ ناسخ-منسوخ کی خرافات جاہل سنی اماموں کی پیداوار ہے۔ مگر یہ سچ غامدی صاحب کے دماغ میں گھسنے سے اس لیے قاصر ہے کیونکہ مسٹر غامدی کو ہر صورت میں اصلاحی اور فراحی کو فالو کرنا ہے۔

غامدی صاحب قران کو سمجھنے کی بجاۓ جاہل امین اصلاحی اور جاہل فراہی کو فرشتہ ثابت کرنے میں جٹے رہتے ہیں۔
مسٹر @azhariqbal1390
اس روزوں کی ایت کو یہاں پوسٹ کرو جو غامدی کے مطابق منسوخ ہے اور وہ ایت بھی پوسٹ کرو جو غامدی کے قریب ناسخ ہے۔ پھر میں اپ کو راشنل جواب سے بتاؤں گا کہ غامدی نے سفید جھوٹ بولا ہے۔ یہ ادمی قران کو نہیں سمجھتا، بس اپنی دکانداری چلا رہا ہے۔ اس کا مقصد قران کو سمجھنا ہے ہی نہیں بلکہ ماضی کے دو جاہل ملاؤں اصلاحی اور فراہی کو فرشتے ثابت کرنا ہے۔ پھر یہ بے-عقل ادمی کہتا ہے کہ عیسی کے مرنے کے بعد فرشتے عیسی کی لاش اٹھا کر اسمان پر لے گیے اور وہ لاش ۲۰۰۰ سال سے فریزر میں پڑی ہے۔ ان باتوں سے پتہ چلتا ہے کہ اس ادمی کے پاس نہ کامن-سینس ہے نہ ہی قران کی سجھ، نہ ہی میٹافزکس کی سمجھ۔– اس بندے نے ایت ۲۰:۵۵ نہیں پڑھی جس میں الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ فرماتے ہیں کہ تم کو مٹی سے بنایا ہے اور تم مٹی میں ہی واپس جاؤ گے، اسمان پر نہیں۔ بلکل ایسے ہی تورت جنیسز ۳:۱۹ میں لکھا۔ ۲۰:۵۵ مِنْهَا خَلَقْنَـٰكُمْ وَفِيهَا نُعِيدُكُمْ وَمِنْهَا نُخْرِجُكُمْ تَارَةً أُخْرَىٰ۔
موت کا ایک سٹینڈرڈ قانون ہے قُلْ يَتَوَفَّىٰكُم مَّلَكُ ٱلْمَوْتِ ٱلَّذِى وُكِّلَ بِكُمْ ثُمَّ إِلَىٰ رَبِّكُمْ تُرْجَعُونَ ۳۲:۱۱ کہ موت کے بعد مٹی کا جسم واپس مٹی میں جاتا ہے اور جو روحانی انسان جو ماں کے رحم میں بھیجا گیا تھا زندگی کے امتحان ٦۷:۲ کے بعد مر جاتا ہے اور موت کے بعد اسی روح کو، الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کی طرف اٹھا لیا جاتا ہے ٦:۹۴، ۳۲:۱۱، ۳:۵۵۔ زندہ یا مردہ مٹی کا جسم الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کی طرف نہ تو جاتا ہے نہ ہی جا سکتا ہے کیونکہ مٹی کا جسم الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کے روحانی-ریلم میں داخل ہو ہی نہیں سکتا۔ وہ دنیا اور ہے اور یہ دنیا اور۔ اس مٹی کے جسم کی انکھ، الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کو نہیں دیکھ سکتی ۷:۱۴۳

وَلَمَّا جَآءَ مُوسَىٰ لِمِيقَـٰتِنَا وَكَلَّمَهُۥ رَبُّهُۥ قَالَ رَبِّ أَرِنِىٓ أَنظُرْ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ لَن تَرَىٰنِى وَلَـٰكِنِ ٱنظُرْ إِلَى ٱلْجَبَلِ فَإِنِ ٱسْتَقَرَّ مَكَانَهُۥ فَسَوْفَ تَرَىٰنِى فَلَمَّا تَجَلَّىٰ رَبُّهُۥ لِلْجَبَلِ جَعَلَهُۥ دَكًّا وَخَرَّ مُوسَىٰ صَعِقًا فَلَمَّآ أَفَاقَ قَالَ سُبْحَـٰنَكَ تُبْتُ إِلَيْكَ وَأَنَا۠ أَوَّلُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ

الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ ایت ۷:۱۴۳ میں فرماتے ہیں۔

اور جب موسیٰ ہمارے مقرر کیے ہوئے وقت پر (کوہ طور) پر پہنچے اور ان کے پروردگار نے ان سے کلام کیا تو کہنے لگے کہ اے پروردگار مجھے (جلوہ) دکھا کہ میں تیرا دیدار (بھی) دیکھوں۔ پروردگار نے کہا کہ تم مجھے ہرگز نہ دیکھ سکو گے۔ ہاں پہاڑ کی طرف دیکھتے رہو اگر یہ اپنی جگہ قائم رہا تو تم مجھے دیکھ سکو گے۔ جب ان کا پروردگار پہاڑ پر نمودار ہوا تو (تجلی انوارِ ربانی) نے اس کو ریزہ ریزہ کردیا اور موسیٰ بےہوش ہو کر گر پڑے۔ جب ہوش میں آئے تو کہنے لگے کہ تیری ذات پاک ہے اور میں تیرے حضور توبہ کرتا ہوں اور جو ایمان لانے والے ہیں ان میں سب سے اولOur Team has also published other two pages, part 01 and Part 02 under the title “Analyzing and Filtering Mullah Javed Ahmed Ghamidi”. Some our members used in those pages relatively harsh language against Mr. Ghamidi, so, we have now password-protected those pages in order not to be read by any one, and finally those both pages will be deleted. Because, we do not have any motive or intension against Mr. Ghamidi. We have right to differ with him in opinion but we do not have right to insult him. Despite our differences with him on some subjects; fact is: he is a nice, polite, and civilized lovely personally. He is now an old man, and must be respected. Team “Factszz” sincerely prays for the long life of Mr. Ghamidi with his good health because long life is only worth if person is heathy. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience which our previous already password-protected pages have caused to Mr. Ghamdi.            Truth is: in past 1400 years, no one has harmed Islam and we Muslims more than Shia Sodomite Imam Shafi’i. Roman Tentmaker Saul later became Paul hijacked True Islamic path of Jesus/Isa PBUH and whole paradigm was shifted. Paul misled all Christians, and from 2000 years Pauline are misled by Iblees 38:82-83, 14:22. In the same way, Shafi’i was Paul of Islam. He totally defaced Islam, and new counterfeited religion of Mullahs and Imams came into existence. Like Paul, Shia Shafi’i also lead complete paradigm shift; and Deen Islam became Counterfeited Religion of Sunni and Shia sects, and from videos of Mr. Ghamidi, it appears that Mr. Ghamidi thinks that the Greatest Impostor of all times Shafi’i can guide him better than Glorious Quran 17:9, 2:2. We have read each word of Shafi’i’s book Risaala. It is book of Kufr, Fraud, Cheat, Shirk and blatant Lies but Sunni Mullahs love that Shia Impostor Shafi’i. Mr. Ilyas: Talmud is not Scripture. So please do not preach Talmud. Do not justify your wrong preaching through Talmud. It is concocted by Rabbis. Imam Farahi is not Authority but is Quran only. No any Ritual/Namaz in Torah. Namaz of Yahood is invented by Rabbis’ Rabbinic-Council called Sanhedrin. Quran tells in 2:177, Namaz is useless. Because God is Omnipresent 2:115, 50:16, 57:4, 2:177 so his Omnipresence makes all Physical Directional Rituals/Namaz null and Void. You can talk to God any time when you are in your home, at bed, on the peak of Himalaya, in a submarine under sea or walking in a deep wale. He is always with you 57:4, 2:115. No Physical Rituals in any scripture; it cannot be because such physical rituals will contradict Omnipresence of Kabeer-al-Muta’al.What Mr. Ilyas has done by referring Talmud is done almost by all sectarian Mullahs and Pseudo Scholars. When that kind of Sectarians want to strengthen their any irrational argument in any debate; they will call even Swine a great animal but generally they hate swine. Same is the way of our biggggg Mullah Zakir Nuke. When debating Christians, he always shows them that your four Gospels are corrupted, and those four concocted gospels do not represent book of God “Injeel”. By saying so, Naik is 100% correct but when he debates a Muslim to show him that Jesus was lifted by Angels to Sky with his body of Flesh and Bones (all Dust); he tells Muslims: Look: Ascension of  Jesus is also mentioned in Gospel of Mark and Gospel of Luke. So now, in order to win debate, even flesh of Swine became Halal for Zakir Nuke; wow. Truth is: this kind of prototype Mullahs of dubious character have ruined we Muslims in past 1200 years. But same Dr. Zakir Nuke does not know that when we read Gospel of Mark and Gospel of Luke of 4th Century from Codex Sinaiticus; no any story of Ascension and return of Jesus exists in Gospel of Mark and Luke 24:51. It is Church who blended last 12 verses at the end of Gospel of Mark, and tampered Luke 24:51 much later in order to blend story of Ascension and return to show new converts that Pauline-Dogma is a supernatural dogma. Truth is: Jesus survived death on the Cross 4:157. Verse 4:157 never denies nailing of Jesus on the Cross but verse 4:157 rejects Crucifixion of Jesus. Quran also tells in 5:117 that Jesus died at very old age 5:110 (Kahlan) naturally; and his grave still exists. If you want to see his grave even today, you can see his grave. But Sunni and Shia escape from this Truth of Quran by blaming false Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani. Do not miss to read our magnum opus page “The Best Scholarly Page on the life of Jesus – A Treasure for the students of comparative religion“.Quran is Mubeen/Crystal Clear book and Quran NEVER DENIES nailing of Jesus on the Cross in 4:157 but Quran powerfully rejects Crucifixion (death on Cross) of Jesus. But Quran also tells that after a long life over 90 years age (Kahlan>>5:110), Jesus died naturally 5:117, and dead never return.

ایک بچہ بھی جانتا ہے کہ وفات کے کیا معنی ہیں۔ مثال کے طور پر اگر یہ خبر چھپتی ہے کہہ زرداری وفات پا گیا ہے تو اس کا مطلب ہے کہ وہ مر گیا ہے۔
مرنے کے بعد مٹی کا مردہ جسم واپس مٹی میں جاتا ہے آسمان پر نہیں جاتا ۲۰:۵۵

مِنْهَا خَلَقْنَـٰكُمْ وَفِيهَا نُعِيدُكُمْ وَمِنْهَا نُخْرِجُكُمْ تَارَةً أُخْرَىٰ

– لفظ رفعہ جو ایت ۴:۱۵۸ میں موجود ہے اس کے معنی درجہ کی بلندی اور روحانی بلندی ہے

But Sectarians superimpose on Quran their fabricated hadiths, and escape from the truth of Quran by blaming False Prophet Mirz G A Qadiani. Historically and archeologically, the man buried in Rozabal as “Yuz Asaph” is no one but Jesus. After surviving death on the Cross, he hid himself as gardener, and later for security reasons, travelled to Damascus under Pseudo Name “Yuz Asaf”; then to Nisibis Turjey, then to Persia, then to Herat Afghanistan, then to Taxila Pakistan, then to Murree Pakistan and then to Srinagar Kashmir.

Even in their own Gospel of Matthew in 15:24 “Jesus said: I have been sent to only lost sheep of Israel. Lost sheep mean lost tribes of Israel. And it is 100% Correct that people of Kashmir, Afghanistan and KPK Pakistan are among lost tribes of Israel. They were taken in Captivity by Babylonian Emperor Nebuchadnezzar (Bakht Nasr) around 586 BC; and then they were deported to East which is now Kashmir KPK and Afghanistan. Even after 2500 years after their deportation, even today you can find tribe Names of Kashmiri People in Old Testament.Gospel of Barnabas is a PURE FORGERY. Ghamidi is preaching from Fabricated Books. This man knows nothing on this subject. He is misguiding people, badly:

“Muslim scholar Cyril Glasse writes in The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam that “As regards the “Gospel of Barnabas” itself, there is no question that it is a medieval forgery … It contains anachronisms which can date only from the Middle Ages and not before, and shows a garbled comprehension of Islamic doctrines, calling the Prophet the “Messiah”, which Islam does not claim for him. Besides it farcical notion of sacred history, stylistically it is a mediocre parody of the Gospels, as the writings of Baha Allah are of the Koran.”

Assistant Professor Ali Ataie of Zaytuna College Berkeley, California, USA writes that: The vast majority of Muslim academics and scholars of comparative religion have deemed the so-called Gospel of Barnabas as pseudepigraphical, meaning that it is a forgery, probably a pious fraud, that was written for polemical reasons and dubiously attributed to the apostle Barnabas, the traveling companion of Paul according to the Book of Acts in the New Testament.
Dr. Ali Ataie is a scholar of biblical hermeneutics with field specialties in Sacred Languages, Comparative Theology, and Comparative Literature. At Zaytuna College, Dr. Ataie has taught Arabic, Creedal Theology, Comparative Theology, Sciences of the Quran, Introduction to the Qur’an, and Seminal Ancient Texts.

Nowhere Quran tells in 4:157 that Jesus was replaced by someone. That Fake story sprouted from gnostic Christians; then it made its way to forged hadith books and then it was infused in the heads of Mullahs like Ghamidi. In 4:157, word Shubbiha=Resembled is used, and a person in deeeeep coma RESEMBLES a dead. So, verse 4:157 is telling that on the Cross, Jesus Resembled a Dead but he was not dead because he was in deeeeeep coma. Later, he was removed from the Cross and Resuscitated. This means: he did not die on the Cross, which means: he was NOT CRUCIFIED=Wa Ma Salabuhu because according to all definitions of Crucifixion in Ancient Arabic or English Lexicons; death on the Cross is a BINDING CONDITION of the punishment which is called Crucifixion. If man dies on the Cross, he is Crucified but if man survived death on the Cross, he is not Crucified.

Quranic verse 4:157 never denies nailing of Jesus on the Cross but this verse denies Crucifixion of Jesus.

From all historical Sources, from 4 Gospels, from apocrypha, from archaeology, and from Tibetan Scroll, it appears that Jesus was indeed nailed on the Cross but he survived=So; not Crucified=Wa Ma Salabuhu. All sources cannot be wrong. And what these all sources say never contradict verse 4:157. If we read and understand 4:157 at microlevel, this verse also confirms that Jesus was indeed on the Cross. Words “not crucified but it seemed so (as is crucified)” make clear that he was on the Cross but not died on the Cross.

Gospel of Barnabas is pure Forgery and it has been rejected by all Bible Scholars; even by those bible scholars who are Atheists, and it is rejected even by several Muslim Scholars. Contents of that fake book of Barnabas (forged by a Turk) contradict Quran; and any book which contradict Quran, cannot be a reliable book.

Responding to Mubariz Khan under one video of Javed Ghamidi. Comments of Mubariz Khan were as follow: Then what happened with the Jesus later? How and where did he die? And what about Jesus coming back etc.? Can you please tell that too, in detail. A member of our team responded to Mubariz Khan as under:

Part 01/03
First of all, I want to clarify that I believe that Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him) was the last Prophet, and if anyone claimed for Prophethood after him; his such claim was absurd.

In order to study the life of Jesus in depth, we have to study history very well, and also all Gospels, new and of 4th century and also apocrypha. We must also understand Noble Quran ONLY through Quran’s own built-in Tasreef, and we must NEVER superimpose any story of traditions and Tafsir on Quran because by doing so, will change the original translation of verses. Our team specializes on the life of Jesus and we have done over 40 years Research on this subject which we have already published in our pages.

We start from Bible/Gospels. In four Gospels of today, we read story of Ascension and Return of Jesus in Luke 24:51 and in last 12 verses of Gospel of Mark. But when we read the oldest available copies of these two Gospels from Codex Sinaiticus of 4th Century; we do not find any trace of that story of Ascension and Return of Jesus in Gospel of Mark nor in Luke 24:51. This makes clear; that Church added this fable in Mark and in Luke 24:51 much later in order to impress new converts that Christian Dogma is a Supernatural Dogma.

Then, when in 7th Century, Christians converted to Islam; they told their concocted story of Ascension and Return of Jesus to Muslims. Then this fable made its way to Concocted Hadith Books of Sunni and Shia sects. Then in order to RECONCILE their fabricated hadiths of Ascension and Return of Jesus with Quran; Sunni and Shia translators started to tamper translation of several verses of Quran. They twisted 4:157 and added in it, fake story of Substitution (so sad that even Mr. Ghamidi also believes in this fake story). This story of Substitution was INDEED sprouted from some gnostic Christian groups. then that story made its way to Sunni and Shia books.

Fact is: like tons of historical evidence, verse 4:157 too, never denies nailing of Jesus on the Cross but Quran denies Crucifixion of Jesus=Not died on the Cross=Wa Ma Salabu.

Ancient copies of Gospels and historical records show that by a plan, Jesus was drugged on the cross in order to appear as perfectely dead. This was a plan to save his life 3:54. Usually, death on Cross takes three to nine days but Jesus was removed from the cross just after six hours because when he sucked drug which was mixed in Sponge; immediately his neck was turned aside, and now apparently he appeared perfectly dead. Then Essene (HawaariYoon Muslims 3:52) approached to Roman Governor and told him, because he is already died, so we need his body. Governor was stunned that how has he died just after 6 hours! He agreed to give body of Jesus to Essenes; to Essene-Muslim Dr. Nicodemus and Essene-Muslim Rich-Merchant Joseph of Arimathea. They took his body to a empty Tomb and treated him with Aloe Vera and other herbs. Essene-Muslim Nicodemus was an expert Doctor. On 3rd Day, Jesus opened his eyes and asked: where I am? Essenes told him full story.

Part 02/03
After coming out of deeeeep Coma, Jesus came out of empty tomb, and hid himself as gardener (see Gospel of John). Now he was afraid that Romans could arrest him again, and put him on the Cross again. So, there was only one solution, and that was: to immigrate to that country which was not under Roman’s jurisdiction. After making over 20 secret meetings with his Essene disciples; he told them: Now, he is leaving them, and will never return. Disciples asked: Ok but after you, whom should we follow? He told, follow “James the Just“. We read in Gospel of Matthew 15:24 that Jesus told his disciples that God has sent him only in order to preach lost sheep (tribes) of Israel.

Historian Tabari also writes that Jesus and his mother left Palestine, and they wandered from country to country to get refuge. Quranic verse 23:50 also CLEARLY shows that Mary and Jesus became refugees (Muhaajar). This verse also indicated; in what kind of land Jesus and his Mother were given Refuge, and that kind of land 100% fits to Murree and Kashmir.

Historical record show: then, along with his mother Mary and some disciples, Jesus made program to immigrate to Damascus as the first step. For security Reasons, he traveled to Damascus under Pseudo name Yuz Asaph (healer). But some one spied and told Paul (at that time, Paul was Police officer of Romans) that Jesus has survived and now is present in Damascus. Paul took some people with him and went to Damascus to arrest Jesus but with God’s permission, Jesus knew, Paul is coming. So Jesus along with his disciple Peter came ahead and met Paul on the road to Damascus and asked him: O Paul: what I have done wrong that you came to arrest me again? During debate, Paul surrendered. He saw a sword in the hands of Peter who could finish him any time.

Then Record show, Jesus moved to Turkish City NISIBIS; then to Persia and had many debates with Magi, and told them: do not worship the Sun, as the Sun is just a creation of Lord of the Universe. Records of those debates still exist. Then he moved to Herat Afghanistan; then moved to Taxila Pakistan. In Taxila, he along with Thomas, attended marriage party of daughter of Raja of Taxila (see Acts of Thomas). Their statutes still exist in Taxila Museum. Whole historical record shows that Yuz Asaph was no one but Jesus. Indian and Pakistani Christians even today call Jesus Yasu which is another form of Yuzu/Yuz.

Then Jesus moved to a Hill near Pakistani Capital. Due to his healing and miracles, people started to build their houses in the same hill, and in the honor of Mary, they named that town as “MARY”. That 2000 years old town today is called not MARY but Murree because British Rulers of India changed its name from Mary to Murree in 19th century. Mary died in that town, and her Jewish Style grave still exists on the hilltop of Murree. You can go there even today to see that Grave.

Then Jesus moved to Srinagar and preached lost tribes of Israel (People of Kashmir and Afghanistan and KPK Pakistan). He died at age 120 and he was buried by Thomas in Rozabal. You can see 2000 years old Jewish Style Grave of Jesus in Rozabal Srinagar even today. To the grave of Jesus is attached a stone slab/sculpture which was covered with centuries old Candle Wax. When Director of Kashmir Archaeology Sufi Murshid and Professor Dr. Fida Hassnain asked his employee to clean all the wax; he stunned to see that on the top of that slab, feet of Jesus were engraved and in those feet, nail-driven injury can be seen clearly. seems, one big seven inch nail was driven in his feet after placing one foot on other foot. People who buried Jesus made that slab in order to show future generations, that this is the grave of Jesus. God says in Quran: we have made Jesus and his mother Sign. Now, how do we know that People of Kashmir and Afghanistan are lost tribes of Israel? For its answer, read next part 03

Part 03/03
In year 586 BC, Babylonian Emperor Nebuchadnezzar (Bakht Nasr) attacked state of Israel and from their 12 tribes; he took 10 tribes in captivity. Only two tribes were left in Palestine, Tribe of Judah (Yahooda) and Tribe of Benjamin (Banyameen). Much later, those tribes were deported to Eastern lands which are called today Afghanistan and Kashmir. The biggest proof of, that Afghani and Kashmiri are lost tribes of Israel; even after 2500 years of their deportation from Palestine, even today we can see tribe names of People of Kashmir and Afghanistan in Old Testament. Because Tribe-names run through centuries. Even today, marriage customs and eating habits of Afghan and Kashmiris are like their Cousins Jews. In Marriage parties, still Bridegroom wears star of David on her forehead. There are many many places in Kashmir which are named on the name of Jesus.

Just for your info; it is written in over 36 well-Known ancient Books of Sunni sect that Prophet Mohammad told his daughter Fatimah that I will live half life of Jesus, because he lived 120 year so I will live only 60. You will see some reports which show that Prophet died at 63 but there are over 6 reports in Bukhari and Muslim and in Muwatta and in Tirmidhi which tell that he died at age 60. Ibn Rushd Al-Jadd was one of the greatest Scholars of Maliki Fiqh. He wrote in his book “al-Bayaan wal Tehseel” that Jesus died at age 120. He has quoted hadith of Prophet which I have already mentioned above. Dear Khan: Dead people (Quran 5:116-117, 3:144) never come back to this war-torn planet.

After reading above-posted comments of our Member; that so called Mubariz Khan commented as under:

Though your version of story looks very likeable and possible but I have a question too, I have heared the similar kind of story just from Ahmadis only, May I ask you that you have written, that prophet Muhammad was the last prophet, so what is your source of this detailed version of Jesus’s life?

Our Team Member then responded to Mubariz Khan as follow: Our scientists read and get guidance from the theory of Einstein who was a Jew. should they reject work of Einstein only because he was a Jew? if a Hindu tells you that 2+2=4; will you reject his claim because he is a Hindu? In my all comments, I have not given any reference from books of any Qadiani or Ahmadi, because according to my opinion, Qadiani or Ahmadi are non-Muslims. I have given all references from Gospels, History and Quran. And if any Qadiani also gives you references from history; then should you reject his argument only because he has quoted from history? So, your argument is same old nonsensical childish rant which does not have any rationality; not at all.

A mature rational mind will never raise that point which you have raised. It has become a fashion in India and Pakistan that any one who tells them that Jesus is dead and he will not return; immediately they place label of Ahmadi or Qadiani on him. This is moral bankruptcy of those guys. Fact is: To believe in Natural Death of Jesus (as it is given in Quran); never makes one, Qadiani or Ahmadi nor natural death of Jesus endorses False prophethood of Mirza Qadiani. Even many people in Pak say that Ghamidi is Qadiani. They say so only because Ghamidi talks differently on the life of Jesus. But knowledge of Ghamidi on this subject is almost Zero

Purpose behind this discussion is mere to share info. If you love to believe in the Fable of Church and Mullahs; you are free to do so. Fact is: Those are historical facts which Sir Syed started to mention; and then Mirza Qadiani started to copy Sir Syed, and of course Sir Syed, Abu al-Kalam Azad, ObaidUllah Sindhi and Allama Iqbal were not followers of False Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani but those all non-Qadiani sages rejected fable of Ascension and return of Jesus. 1200 years ago, Imam Malik said: Maat Isa مات عیسی. Isa is dead. Was Imam Malik a Qadiani?

Iqbal was a bigggg brain. Iqbal rejected all those stories of hadiths which tell that Jesus will return because Iqbal said: faith cannot be built on this kind of al-Ahaad Hadiths of his excellency Abu Hurairah who was listening stories from Rabbi K’ab al-Ahbar and was telling Muslims those stories, and by mistake, some Muslims wrote those Stories as Hadiths of Rasool. This is given by Ibn Kathir Dhahabi and Muslim bin Hajjaj in his book Tamyeez who also wrote sahih-Muslim.

I have also mentioned in my previous comments that in over 30 ancient well-known books of Sunni sect; one hadith is mentioned which says: Jesus died at age 120. Now please tell me: what that Hadith has to do with Mirza G A Qadiani? Will you now say that Prophet Mohammad was also a Qadiani?

Well known historian of 10th Century Tabari wrote that Jesus and his Mother Mary have to leave Palestine, and they wandered from country to country مہاجر. Was Tabari, follower of Mirza G A Qadiani?

Quranic verse 23:50 tells that Mary and Jesus became refugee (Muhaajar مہاجر) and God gave them refuge on high place where were fountains and gardens. Was Mirza Qadiani author of verse 23:50, or God? According to meaning of Proto Root of word وَءَاوَيْنَـٰهُمَآ which is used in 23:50, translation is: “We gave them refuge/Asylum” – And Refuge and asylum is given to that person who is forced to leave his homeland. Mr. Mubariz Khan: we beg to ask you; Was verse 23:50 authored by God or by your beloved Mirza G A Qadiani? Read more discussion on verse 23:50 at this link.

2000 years ago, Thomas wrote in his Acts “Acts Thomae” that long after the incidence of Cross; Jesus and he (Thomas) attended marriage party of daughter of Raja of Taxila (now in Pakistan). How can you relate “Act Thomae” with Mirza G A Qadiani?

Restored Gospel of Nazarene tells that after surviving death on the Cross, Jesus immigrated to East of Parthia. And 2000 years ago Parthian Empire covered also Afghanistan Pakistan, Taxila, Kashmir too. Now what have Gospel of Nazarene to do with Mirza G A Qadiani?

Even when we read oldest books of hadith Literature like Musannaf Abd-ar-Razzaq, we see in those books that Story of returning of Jesus is being NOT TOLD by Prophet but by only Abu Hurairah which he listened from great hadith forger Rabbi K’ab al-Ahbar

You have asked proof of what I have written in my previous comments. I have already given the source of that proof in my previous comments. I cannot post it again, as YouTube can mark it spam. If you read my previous comments, you will find the source of proof.بہتر ہوتا کہ دین کے متعلق لوگوں کو گمراہ کرنے کی بجائے غامدی، پچوں کے لیے ٹوٹ-بٹوٹ جیسی کہانیاں لکھتا جن کو پڑھ کر بچے خوش ہوتے۔ اس کی بچگانہ سٹوریوں سے صاف پتہ چلتا ہے کہ اس بندے کو بنیادی چیزوں کا بھی پتہ نہیں۔ یہ ایک پرلے درجے کا جاہل انسان ہے۔ نہ اسے قران کی صحیح سمجھ ہے نہ ہی اس نے تاریخ کو بھرپور پڑھا ہے، اور عیسائی اور یہودی مذاہب پر یہ مطلق جاہل ہے۔ یہ عیسیائوں کی من-گھڑت حدیث کی کتابوں مارک، میتھیو، لوک اور جان کو انجیل کہتا ہے حالانکہ اصلی انجیل۔ عیسی کی موت کے بعد ناپید ہوگئی تھی۔ سب بڑے بائبل کے سکالر کہتے ہیں کہ اج تک کسی کو نہیں پتہ کہ مارک، میتھیو، لوک اور جان کے مصنفوں کا کیا نام ہے۔ مارک، میتھیو، لوک اور جان جیسے نام ان چار گپ-شپ کی کتابوں کے ساتھ دوسری صدی کے اخر میں منسلک کیے گئے تھے

غامدی کی یہ بچگانہ کہانی ایک مذاق سے کم نہیں کہ فرشتے مردہ عیسی کو اٹھا کر لے گئے تھے۔ اگر عیسی کو اٹھاتے وقت غامدی نے کوئی ویڈیو بنایا تھا تو اس ویڈیو کو اپ-لوڈ کرے۔ غامدی کی ساری کہانی ایک من-گھڑت کتاب بارناباس پر مشتمل ہے جسے غامدی، انجیل کہتا ہے حالانکہ عیسی کی موت کے بعد اصلی انجیل ناپید ہو گئی تھی۔ قران ۲۰:۵۵ میں اللہ تعالی فرماتا ہے کہ تم کو مٹی سے بنایا ہے اور تم واپس مٹی میں ہی جاؤ گے مگر غامدی اس مٹی کے مردہ جسم کو اسمان پر بھيج رہا ہے۔ ایت ۳۲:۱۱ میں موت کا قانون بتا دیا گیا ہے کہ موت کا فرشتہ انسان کو موت دیتا ہے اور پھر موت کے بعد مٹی کا جسم نہیں بلکہ روح خدا کے پاس لے جائی جاتی ہے۔ وہی بات ایت ۳:۵۵ میں کہی گئی ہے۔ غامدی، برناباس کی گاسپل کا حوالہ دے رہا ہے اور بائبل کے سب سکالر اور کافی مسلم سکالر بھی کہتے ہیں کہ برناباس کی گاسپل جعلی ہے جسے ایک ترک نے فورج کیا تھا۔ نبی عیسی کے بارے میں غامدی کا علم بہت کمزور ہے نہ ہی اس کو قران کی صحیح سمجھ ہے۔ لیکن اس نے اپنی سٹوری ضرور سنانی ہوتی ہے خواہ وہ سٹوری خالص بچگانہ ہی کیوں نہ ہو۔ سچ یہ ہے کہ قران کے علاوہ، کوئی بھی اللہ کی کتاب، اپنی اصلی حالت میں نہیں ہے۔ سچ یہ ہے عیسی صلیب پر تو نہیں مرے مگر ایک لمبی عمر کے بعد مر گئے اور روضہ-بل کی قبر میں دفن ہوئے۔ اور مردے واپس نہیں اتے۔ خدا کی روحانی دنیا میں نہ کوئی زندہ داخل ہو سکتا ہے نہ ہی مردہ داخل ہو سکتا ہے۔ مر کر، جسم مٹی میں جاتا ہے اور روح کو اٹھا لیا جاتا ہے۔ یہی قران کا سچ ہے مگر جاہل لوگ، اس سچ سے بھاگ کر جھوٹے نبی مرزا قادیانی کے پیچھے پڑ جاتے ہیں

جیسا کہ ہم نے لکھا ہے کہ عیسائی اور یہودی مذاہب کے متعلق غامدی ایک جاہل مطلق ہے۔ یہ ادمی بارناباس کی جعلی گاسپل کے حوالے تو دیتا ہے مگراس نے تمام گاسپلز کے پرانے نسخے نہیں پڑھے جن میں لکھا ہے کہ صلیب سے اتارنے کے بعد جب ایک خالی ٹومب میں ایسین یعنی حواری، نبی عیسی کے زخموں کا علاج کر رہے تھے وہ ان کے سر اور پاؤں کی طرف بیٹھے ہوئے تھے اور کچھ عورتوں نے انہیں دیکھا۔ سب حواری سفید لباس پہنتے تھے۔ مگر بعد میں پادریوں نے ان سفید کپڑوں میں ملبوث حواریوں کو فرشتے بنا ڈالا۔ اسی جعلی کہانی کو غامدی اپنے ویڈیو میں سنا کر کہہ رہا ہے کہ مرے ہوئے عیسی کو فرشتے اٹھا کر لے گئے- اس جاہل کو اس قسم کی مزاحیہ بچگانہ کہانیاں سناتے ہوے شرم بھی نہیں اتی۔

تین دن کے علاج کے بعد نبی عیسی عليه السلام کو ہوش آ گیا مگر خطرہ تھا کہ اگر رومنوں کو پتہ چل گیا کہ یہ تو بچ گیا ہے تو وہ، نبی عیسی کو دوبارہ پکڑ لیتے لہذا ایک نیا بہروپ ضروری تھا۔ جان بچانا فرض ہے۔ تو شروع میں نبی عیسی عليه السلام نے باغ کے مالی کا بہروپ اختیار کیا اور خفیہ مقام پر اپنے شاگردوں سے بیس سے زیادہ میٹنگ کیں۔ پہلی میٹنک میں کچھ شاگرد ڈر گئے کہ یہ نبی عیسی نہیں بلکہ اس کی روح ہے۔ ان کا شک دور کرنے کے لیے نبی عیسی عليه السلام نے ان کو صلیب پر پانے والے اپنے زخم دکھائے اور شاگردوں کو ان زخموں کو انگلی سے ٹچ کرنے کو کہا کیونکہ روح کا، مادی جسم نہیں ہوتا۔ پھر نبی عیسی عليه السلام نے شاگردوں کو پوچھا کہ کیا اپ کے پاس کچھ کھانے کو ہے؟ شاگردوں نے نبی عیسی کو پکی ہوئی مچھلی دی جو نبی عیسی نے ان کے سامنے کھائی کیونکہ روح کھانا نہیں کھاتی۔ بیس عدد میٹنگ کے بعد، نبی عیسی عليه السلام نے شاگردوں کو کہا کہ میں اب اپ سب کو چھوڑ کر دور جا رہا ہوں اور واپس نہیں آؤں گا۔ پھر تاریخ کا ریکارڈ بتاتا ہے اپنے اپ کو رومنوں سے خفیہ رکھنے کے لئے نبی عیسی عليه السلام نے اپنا سوڈو نام یوز-اصاف رکھا اور دمشق چلے گئے پھر ترکی کے شہر نسی-بس گئے پھر ایران گئے، پھر ہرات افغانستان گئے پھر ٹیکسلا پاکستان گئے اور تھامس کے ساتھ، ٹیکسلا کے راجہ کی بیٹی کی شادی میں بھی شرکت کی۔ دولہا دلہن کو اچھی طرح زندگی گزارنے پر لیکچر بھی دیا۔ راجہ اپ کا مرید تھا۔ پھر نبی عیسی عليه السلام مری-پاکستان گئے پھر سرینگر کشمیر گئے۔ ایک س

و بیس کی عمر میں موت نے آ لیا اور اپ کو روضہ-بل کی قبر میں دفن کر دیا گیا۔ ان کی قبر اچ بھی صحیح سلامت ہے۔ اب یہ سب تاريخ ہے اور اس تاريخ کا جھوٹے نبی مرزا غلام احمد قایایانی سے بھلا کیسے تعلق ہو سکتا ہے۔ تاريخ کا ریکاڈ ایک پانی سے بھرے ہوئے کنواں کی مانند ہے۔ اگر اس کنواں سے ایک سنی یا شیعہ یا یہودی یا قادیانی پانی نکالتا ہے تو سب کے گلاس میں جو پانی ہے وہ تو ایک جیسا ہی ہے۔ آکر اپ انگریزی جانتے ہیں تو سب ثبوت پڑھنے کے لیے ہمارہ یہ صفحہ ضرور پڑھیں قران-الحکیم کے مطابق، گو، نبی عیسی عليه السلام کی موت، صلیب پر نہیں ہوئی 4:157 مگر ایک لمبی عمر 5:110 گزارنے کے بعد وہ طبعی طور پر مر گئے 5:117 اور مردے واپس نہیں اتے۔ مگر جاہل فرقہ پرست مولوی، مفتی اور امام، قران کے اس سچ کو ماننے کی بجائے اپنی جہالت کا سارہ غصہ جھوٹے نبی مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی پر ڈال کر بھاگ جاتے ہیں۔ اور یہ فرقہ پرست مولوی، مفتی اور امام اتنے بڑے مجرم ہیں کہ اپنی من-گھڑت روایات کو سپورٹ کرنے کے لیے، قران کی ایات کے ترجمہ کی تحریف کر دیتے ہیں۔ سب سے پہلے وہ ناسٹک-عیسائی تھے جنہوں نے یہ بچگانہ خرافات ایجاد کی کہ عیسی کی جگہ کسی اور بندے کو صلیب پر مارا گیا۔ جب عیسائی، ساتویں صدی عیسوی میں اسلام میں داخل ہوئیے تو انہوں نے یہ خرافات مسلمانوں میں بھی پھیلا دی۔ اسی طرح ان عیسائیوں نے عیسی کے زندہ اسمان پر جانے اور پھر واپس آنے کی خرافات بھی مسلمانوں میں پھیلا دی۔ اب جب عباسیوں کے دور میں سنی اور شیعہ فرقوں کی احادیث کی فورجری شروع ہوئی تو یہ خرافات ان کی احادیث کی کتب میں ڈال دی گئیں۔ اب، فرقہ پرست مولوی، مفتی اور اماموں نے اپنی من-گھڑت احادیث کو قران-مجید سے ری-کنسائل کرنے کے لئے قران کی ایات کے ترجمہ کی تحریف شروع کردی۔ مثال کے طور پر: قران میں لفظ وفات پچیس سے زیادہ ایات میں موت کے لیے استعمال ہوا ہے مگر جب وہی لفظ وفات، عیسی کے استعمال ہوتا ہے تو یہ حرام کے پلے اس کا ترجمہ موت کی بجائے عیسی کا زندہ اسمان پر اٹھایا جانا کر دیتے ہے۔ ہندوستان، پاکستان اور عربوں میں؛ یہاں تک کہ اسکول میں پانچویں جماعت کا طالب علم بھی جانتا ہے کہ وفات کا مطلب موت ہے۔ مثال کے طور پر جب یہ جاہل مولوی اسحاق مرا تھا تو اخبار کی خبر کچھ ایسے تھی کہ مولوی اسحاق وفات پا گیا ہے یعنی مر گیا ہے۔ اسی طرح قران کی متعدد ایات میں، لفظ رفعہ استعمال ہوا ہے جس کے معنی، درجے میں اور روحانی بلندی ہے مگر یہ مولوی اس کا ترجمہ اسمان کی طرف جسم کا زندہ اٹھایا جانا کر دیتے ہیں، سنی فرقہ کی روایات کی کتب میں بھی لفظ رفعہ، درجہ میں بلندی کے لیے کئی دفعہ استعمال ہوا ہے جیسے کہ صحیح-مسلم میں ہے کہ نبی عليه السلام نے کہا وما تواضع أحد لله إلا رفعه الله– ان جاہل ملاؤں کو یہ بھی پتہ نہیں کہ جب ہم، عیسائوں کی چوتھی صدی میں لکھی ہوئی چار گاسپل کو پڑھتے ہیں تو ان میں عیسی کے زندہ اسمان پر جانے اور پھر واپس آنے کی کہانی موجود ہی نہیں۔ یہ کہانی انہوں نے صدیوں بعد، گاسپل میں ڈالی۔ پھر یہ خرافات، من-گھڑت احادیث کا حصہ بن گئیں اور پھر سنی اور شیعہ ملاؤں کے دیمک-زدہ دماغوں میں یہ خرافات گھس گئی۔ اسی طرح یہ ملاں، ایات 4:159, 3:144, 43:61 کے ترجمہ کی بھی تحریف کرتے ہیں۔ ایت 4:157 کبھی بھی یہ نہیں کہتی کہ عیسی کی بجائے کسی اور کو صلیب پر مارا گیا۔ لفظ شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ صرف یہ بتا رہا ہے کہ عیسی عليه السلام  صلیب پر نہیں مرے مگر دشمنوں کو ایسے لگا کہ وہ صلیب پر مر گئے ہیں کیونکہ ایک بے-ہوش ادمی ایسے ہی لگتا ہے جیسے مردہ ادمی۔ تو ایک بے-ہوش انسان کی شبیہ ایک مردہ انسان سے ملتی ہے۔ قران ایت 4:157 میں یہ بالکل نہیں کہتا کہ عیسی عليه السلام کو صلیب پر نہیں چڑہایا گیا بلکہ قران کہتا ہے کہ عیسی مصلوب نہیں ہوئیے یعنی ان کو کروسی-فائی نہیں کیا گیا۔ یعنی ان کی موت، صلیب پر نہیں ہوئی یعنی، وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ۔ کروسی-فکشن کی تعریف یہ ہے کہ اگر کوئی انسان صلیب پر مر جاتا ہے تو اس کا معنی ہے کہ وہ مصلوب ہو گیا یعنی اسے کروسی-فائی کر دیا گیا۔ مگر اگر انسان کو اس کے مرنے سے پہلے ہی صلیب سے اتار دیا گیا اور بعد میں علاج کے بعد وہ صحت-ياب ہو گیا تو وہ کروسی-فائی نہیں ہوا۔ یہی بات قران ایت 4:157 میں کہہ رہا ہے۔ بہت سی تاريخی شہادت بتاتی ہے کہ  نبی عیسی کو صلیب پر چڑھایا گیا۔ اور قران ایت 4:157 میں اس بات سے انکار نہیں کرتا مگر قران ان کی مصلوبیت سے انکار کرتا ہے یعنی ان کی، صلیب پر موت سے انکار کرتا ہے، اور قران کے اس سچ کو تاريخی شواہد بھی سپورٹ کرتے ہیں. صلیب کی موت ان دنوں ایک لعنتی موت جانی جاتی تھی۔

متعدد تاريخ شواہد کے مطابق، جب حواریوں کو یقین ہو گیا کہ رومن اور یہود، ہر صورت میں نبی عیسی کو صلیب کی موت دینا چاہتے ہیں تو انہوں نے نبی عیسی کو بچانے کے لیے ایک منصوبہ بنایا۔ حواری، اعلی درجہ کے حکیم تھے۔ انہوں نے جڑی-بوٹیوں سے ایسی دوائی تیار کی جس کو سونگنے سے ہی انسان اسقدر بے-ہوش ہو جائے کہ اس کی شبیہ شُبِّهَ ایک مردہ انسان کی طرح لگے۔ جب نبی عیسی کو صلیب پر چڑھا کر ان کے پاؤں اور ہاتھ میں کیل ٹھونکے گیۓ تو تھوڑی دیر کے بعد انہوں نے کہا میں پیاسا ہوں۔ اس پر ایک رومن فوجی نے ایک سپنج کو، پوسکا میں ڈبویا اور ایک لمبی ریڈ کے ذریعے نبی عیسی کے ہونٹوں تک پہنچایا۔ نبی عیسی نے اسے جوں ہی ہونٹ سے لگایا وہ بے-ہوش ہو گئے اور ان کی گردن ایک طرف لٹک گئی۔ اسی پوسکا میں حواریوں نے دوائی ملائی تھی۔ اب نبی عیسی کی شبیہ ایک مردہ انسان جیسی تھی اور رومنوں نے سمجھا کہ یہ تو اتنی جلدی مر گیا ہے حالانکہ صلیب پر موت، تین سے اٹھ دن لیتی ہے۔ منصوبہ کے مطابق ایک حواری یوسف، رومن افسر کے پاس گیا اور کہا کیرنکہ عیسی مر چکے ہیں لہذا ہمیں ان کی باڈی دی جائے۔ باڈی لے کر حواری اسے ایک خالی مقبرہ میں لے گئے اور تین دن ان کا علاج کیا۔ تیسرے دن نبی عیسی نے انکھیں کھولیں اور پوچھا میں کہاں ہوں؟ حواریوں نے پھر نبی عیسی کو پوری کہانی سنائی۔ باقی تفصیل ہمارے صفحہ پر پڑھیں۔ دشمنوں نے تدبیر کی نبی کو صلیب پر مارنے کی مگر رب نے تدبیر کی نبی کو موت سے بچانے کی، اور رب کی تدبیر سب سے بہتر ہوتی ہے وَمَكَرُوا۟ وَمَكَرَ ٱللَّهُ وَٱللَّهُ خَيْرُ ٱلْمَـٰكِرِينَ۔ نبی کو بچانے کا منصوبہ رب کا تھا۔ مگر اس منصوبے کی تکمیل حواریوں کے ذریعے کی گئی۔ یہود کی طرف سے نبی عیسی کو تکلیف دینے کا یہ واقعہ کوئی پہلا نہیں تھا۔ قران کہتا ہے کہ یہود نے متعدد انبیاء کو قتل کیا تھا۔      عیسی کی زندگی پر مندرجہ ذیل صفحہ دنیا کا بہترین صفحہ ہے اسے ضرور پڑھیے

اب ہم اس تاريخی ٹریک کی بات کرتے ہیں جو ہمیں صاف صاف بتاتا ہے کہ صلیب کی موت سے بچ جانے کے بعد نبی عیسی اور ان کی والدہ محترمہ حضرت مریم کہا چلے گئے، کہاں رہے، کتنے برس زندہ رہے اور جب نبی عیسی کو ان کی وفات کے بعد قبر میں دفن کیا گیا تو اس وقت نبی عیسی کی عمر کتنی تھی۔ اس سارے تاريخی ٹریک کا جھوٹے نبی مرزا قادیانی سے کوئی تعلق نہیں ہے۔ صلیب سے بچ جانے کے بعد نبی عیسی نے اپنے اپ کو ایک مالی کے بہروپ میں بدلا تاکہ رومن ان کو پکڑ کر دوبارہ صلیب پر نہ چڑھا دیں۔ جان بچانا ہر انسان کا فرض ہے۔ پھر اپ نے کافی دنوں تک حواریوں سے بارہ سے زیادہ دفعہ خفیہ میٹنگ کیں، اور اخر میں انہیں بتایا کہ میں ہجرت کررہا ہوں اور میں دوبارہ یہاں فلسطین میں کبھی نہیں آؤں گا اور میرے بعد جیمز-دا-جسٹ کو فالو کرنا جو کہ اپکا دست-راست تھا۔۔ رومنوں سے پچنے کے لیے اپ نے بھیس بدلا اور نام بھی بدلا۔ وہ نام ہے یوز-اصاف۔ اپ اپنی اماں کو لے کر رات کو نکلے اور ملک-شام کے شہر دمشق چلے گئے۔ اپ وہاں اپنے ایک شاگرد انانیاس کے گھر میں رہے۔ کچھ عرصہ بعد کسی حرام کے پلے نے جاسوسی کی اور رومن پال کو بتایا کہ عیسی تو زندہ ہے اور دمشق میں موجود ہے۔ پال اس وقت رومنوں کا پولیس-افسر تھا۔ نبی عیسی کو گرفتار کرنے کے لیے، پال دمشق گیا۔ مگر نبی عیسی اور ان کے دوستوں نے پال کو دمشق کی طرف انے والے رستے پر ہی سوتے میں پکڑ لیا۔ پال، معافی مانگ کر واپس چلا گیا اور مشہور کر دیا کہ میں نے نبی عیسی کو وژن میں دیکھا ہے۔ پھر اسی پال نے عیسائیوں کو گمراہ کیا اور غلط رستہ پر لگا دیا۔ دمشق کے بعد نبی عیسی ترکی کے شہر نسی-بس گئے۔ وہاں سے ایران گئے اور وہاں پارسی-ملاؤں سے کافی مناظرے کیے اور انہیں کہا، آگ کو مت پوجو۔۔ ان مناظروں کا ریکارڈ ایران میں موجود ہے۔ پھر وہاں سے اپ افغانستان کے شہر ہرات گئے۔ پھر پاکستان کے شہر ٹیکسلا گئے اور وہاں اپ نے تھامس کے ساتھ، راجہ کی اکلوتی بیٹی کی شادی میں بھی شرکت بھی کی اور دولہا دلہن کو پند-و-نصیحت بھی کی کہ کیسے اچھی زندگی گزارنی ہے۔ شواہد ٹیکسلا میوزیم میں موجود ہیں۔ پھر اپ نے پاکستانی کیپیٹل اسلام-اباد کے قریب ایک پہاڑی پر رہائش اختیار کی۔ ان کے معجزات کی وجہ سے بہت سے لوگوں نے اسی پہاڑی پر ارد-گرد مکان بنا لیے اور اس نئے گاؤں کا نام نبی عیسی کی والدہ کے نام پر “میری” رکھا۔ کچھ مدت بعد میری یعنی حضرت مریم فوت ہو گئیں اور نبی عیسی نے ان کو “میری” کی چوٹی پر ایک قبر میں دفن کردیا-

وہ انگریز تھے جنہوں نے انیسویں صدی میں اس گاؤں “میری” کا نام بدل کر “مری” رکھ دیا۔ یہ وہی صحت-افزا قصبہ ہے جو پاکسانی کیپیٹل اسلام-اباد کے قریب ہے۔ حضرت مریم کی دو ہزار سال پرانی یہودی سٹائل کی قبر ابھی بھی مری میں موجود ہے۔ اس کے بعد، نبی عیسی کشمیر کے شہر سرینگر چلے گئے اپ 120 سال کی عمر تک کشمیری اور افغانی قبائل کو تبلیغ کرتے رہے۔ فوتگی کے بعد تھامس نے انہیں سرینگر میں روضہ-بل میں دفن کیا۔ اپ کی دو-ہزار سال پرانی یہودی-سٹائل کی قبر کے ساتھ ایک پتھر کی تختی بھی جڑی ہوئی ہے جس پر نبی عیسی کے پیروں کے نشان کندہ ہیں۔ وہ نشان صاف بتاتے ہیں کہ صلیب پر اپکے ایک پاؤں کو دوسرے پاؤں کے اوپر رکھ کر سات انچ لمبا کیل ٹھونکا گیا۔ پھر بھی خدا نے ان کو صلیب کے اوپر مرنے سے بچا لیا، اور اس طرح دشمنوں کی وہ چال ناکام ہوگئی جس کے ذریعے وہ اپ کو کروسی-فائی کرنا چاہتے تھے یعنی صلیب کے اوپر مارنا چاہتے تھے وَمَكَرُوا۟ وَمَكَرَ ٱللَّهُ وَٱللَّهُ خَيْرُ ٱلْمَـٰكِرِينَ۔ اب سوال یہ پیدا ہوتا ہے کہ نبی عیسی، ہجرت کر کے اخرکار کشمیر ہی کیوں آئے؟ اس کا جواب اپکو میتھیو کی گاسپل کی ایت 15:24 میں مل جاتا ہے۔ اس ایت میں نبی عیسی لوگوں کو بتا رہے ہیں ہیں کہ خدا نے انہیں صرف بنی-اسرائیل کی گم-شدہ بھیڑوں کی تبلیغ کرنے کے لیے بھیجا ہے۔ یہاں بنی-اسرائیل کی گم-شدہ بھیڑوں سے مراد بنی-اسرائیل کے وہ دس قبائل ہیں جو 2500 سال پہلے کھو گئے تھے۔ 2500 سال پہلے عراقی شہنشاہ بخت نصر نے اسرائیلی سٹیٹ پر حملہ کر کے اسے مکمل تباہ کر دیا تھا اور بنی-اسرائیل کے بارہ قبائل سے دس قبائل کو غلام بنا لیا تھا۔ بہت بعد میں، اس نے ان دس قبائل کو مشرق کی طرف بے-دخل کر دیا تھا اور اخرکار جس جگہ ان قبائل نے رہائش اختیار کی اسے اج ہم افغانستان اور کشمیر کے نام سے جانتے ہیں۔ قبائل کے نام نہیں بدلتے اور صدیوں چلتے ہیں یہی وجہ ہے کہ 2500 سال گزر جانے کے بعد بھی، اج بھی، اپ کشمیریوں اور افغانیوں کے قبائل کے نام تورات میں دیکھ سکتے ہیں۔ اس سے بڑا ثبوت اور کیا ہو سکتا ہے؟ افغانی اور کشمیری؛ نسلی طور پر یہودی نہیں ہیں بلکہ یہودیوں کے کزن ہیں یعنی چاچے کے پتر ہیں۔ “ریسٹورڈ گاسپل آف نزارین” میں لکھا ہے کہ صلیب کی موت سے بچ نکلنے بعد نبی عیسی پارتھین-ایمپائر کے مشرق میں چلے گئے۔ اگر اپ پارتھین-ایمپائر کا 2000 سال پرانا نقشہ دیکھیں تو اپ کو معلوم ہو گا کہ ایران، افغانستان اور کشمیر کی زمین پارتھین-ایمپائر کے مشرقی حصے تھے۔ ہماری ٹیم نے اس ٹاپک پر چالیس سال تک مسلسل تحقیق کی ہے۔ تو جناب یہ ہے سارہ سچ، مگر رابی، چرچ اور مولوی، صدیوں سے جو رام-لیلا کی کہانی لوگوں کو سنا رہے ہیں اس کا نہ سر ہے نہ ہی پیر۔ ہمارے جاہل فرقہ-پرست مفتی اور مولوی، اس سچ کو ماننے کی بجائے اپنا سارا غصہ جھوٹے نبی مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی پر اتار دیتے ہیں۔ سچ یہ ہے تاریخ کا علم ایک کنویں کی مانند ہے۔ اس کنویں سے ایک مسلمان بھی پانی بھر سکتا ہے اور ایک عیسائی بھی، بدھ بھی، سکھ بھی، مولوی ڈیزل بھی، ہندو بھی اور قادیانی بھی۔ مگر سب کی بالٹیوں میں جو پانی ہے وہ تو ایک جیسا ہی ہے۔ جو بھی نقات ہم نے بیان کیے ہیں اپ ان کے حوالاجات ہمارے مندرجہ ذیل صفحہ میں پڑھ سکتے ہیں مگر یہ صفحہ انگریزی زبان میں ہے Mr. Ghamidi: your definition of word “Qibla” is 100% incorrect. Qibla never means to pray 5 Parsi Namaz facing Kaaba which are declared useless in 2:177. Quran is the most beautiful book because it fully explains itself. Quran has defined QIBLA in 10:87 and that is GHQ=General Head Quarter. How badly you have twisted 10:87. Fear Allah O man: In 10:87, God ordained Moses to take some HOUSES from Egypt and turn those Mud houses into Qibla=GHQ to preach Divine Message=Salat. So, you are saying that People were prostrating to those MUD HOUSES in their Namaz. Does it make any sense? Not at all. Fact is: those Mud Houses were taken as GHQ=Qibla to preach divine message=salat

 

Reader can see clearly in above-posted picture, how has Ghamidi deliberately tampered translation of verse 2:177 in order to validate Pooja-Pot of five Namaz which were imported from Zoroastrians. But if you will ask Ghamidi: why has he tampered translation of this verse? Now, instead of admitting that it was his mistake, and he is going to fix that mistake; this man will launch one video to justify his tampering. Then he will launch part-2 of that video; then he will launch part-50 of that video +++. He will tell tons and tons of additional lies in order to protect his one lie/mistake of tampering. We have never seen this kind of Conscienceless Person in our whole life. He stubbornly sticks to his lies. He is without any Dameer.

Mullah Maududi has translated first line of verse 2:177 correctly but Maududi has tampered translation of several other verses of Quran. These Prototype-Mullahs are supposed to change themselves according to Laws and Codes of Noble Quran but instead of changing themselves, they change translation of Quran. Sunni and Shia translators have been committing this crime from past 1200 years. They frequently tamper not just translation of several verses of Quran but they also tamper translation of their those so called hadiths which prohibit extra-Quranic hadiths, and which bulldoze their some unsound beliefs. “Khud Badaltay Nahin’, Quran badl daitay hei’n”. 

When so-called a hadith given in book of Bukhari, proves 100% that Bukhari was indeed a Zoroastrian hypocrites of Batni Tehreek; then in order to protect Bukhari, Sunni translators tamper translation of such hadiths. You can read its detail in this page. When any Hadith prohibits all extra-Quranic Sunnah and Hadiths; then these Sunni Imams declare such hadiths as D’aeef, Munkar, muqtu’a etc. They have invented a big lie they call it Science of Hadiths. That science of Hadith is like a Machine which can place labels of Halal meat on the packets of pork. Science of Hadiths is another great fraud.

Responding to one person: Mohson Khan about Durood Ibrahimi and five daily Namaz Rituals:

محسن بھائی: قران-مجید ایک بڑی کتاب ہے اور اللہ عزّ وجلّ ایات ٦:۱۱۴ اور ۱٦:۸۹ میں فرماتا ہے کہ اس کا قران، مفصل ہے اور اس کا قران، اس ہر بات کی مکمل تفصیل بیان کرتا ہے جوکہ دین-اسلام کا حصہ ہے۔ ان ایات سے واضغ ہو گیا کہ قران ہی اسلام ہے۔ جو قران میں نہیں ہے وہ دین اسلام کا حصہ نہیں ہے، قرانی صلاۃ کا ان پانچ پوجا-پاٹ نمازوں سے کوئی تعلق نہیں جو ایرانی پارسی مذہب سے، سنی اور شیعہ اماموں نے امپورٹ کیں تھیں۔ اور پھر ان پانچ پارسی نمازوں کو جائز قرار دینے کے لیے انہوں نے اڑنے والے کھوتے براق کی حدیث فورج کر ڈالی۔ انہوں نے براق کی ساری کہانی پارسی مذہب کی ایک کتاب آرڈا-ویراف سے نقل کی۔ محسن بھائی: آگر صلاۃ، نماز ہوتی تو قران ہم کو کم از کم پانچ نمازوں کی رکعات کی تعداد تو ضرور بتاتا۔ یہ پانچ نمازیں، ہندوؤں کی بوجا-پاٹ سے کم نہیں۔ ہندو، شیوا کے بت کو سجدے کر کے پوجتے ہیں اور سنی اور شیعہ نے کعبہ کو بت بنا ڈالا ہے۔ پورے قران-مجید میں ایک ایت بھی نہیں جو ہم کو کعبہ کو سجدے کرنے کو کہتی ہو۔ پورے قران میں ایک ایت بھی نہیں جو یہ کہتی ہو کہ کعبہ کو سجدہ کرنا، صلاۃ کا حصہ ہے۔ قران-مجید کی ایت ۲:۱۷۷ کہتی ہے کہ یہ نماز، نیکی کا کام ہی نہیں۔ یعنی ایسی کعبہ کی پوجا-پاٹ فضول ہے بیکار ہے۔ قران-مجید ایک بڑی، مفصل، اور مکمل کتاب ہے مگر پورے قران-مجید میں نہ تو التحیات کی عبارت موجود ہے نہ ہی درود ابراھیمی موجود ہے۔ التحیات اور درود ابراھیمی کو، بغداد کے ایرانی-نژاد شیعہ حاکم معزدولہ نے فورج کروا کر، نمازوں میں ڈالا تھا۔

سنی اور شیعہ یہ کہتے ہیں کہ نماز کا طریقہ اور تفصیل انہوں نے رسول کی احادیث اور سنت سے سیکھی ہے۔ مگر یہ ایک جھوٹ ہے کیونکہ نبی نے یا چار خلفاء نے یا کسی بھی صحابی نے پیچھے ایک صفحہ بھی حدیث اور سنت کا نہیں چھوڑا۔ سب کی سب سنت اور احادیث کی کتب بدعا ہیں۔ یہ کتابیں من-گھڑت ہیں

گو میں نے اس ٹاپک پر پہلے ہی مفصل رائے دے دی ہیں اور میں، ایک جاہل انسان کے ساتھ اپنا مزید وقت ضائع نہیں کرنا چاہتا، پھر بھی۔ جاتے جاتے، میں ایک نقطہ کی وضاحت کرتا چلوں۔ قران-مجید دنیا کی سب سے زیادہ خوبصورت کتاب ہے کیونکہ قران، اپنی تصریف کے ذریعے، خود اپنی تفسیر کرتا ہے۔ قران کی ایات ۲۲:۱۸ اور ۵۵:٦ بتاتی ہیں کا چاند، سورج، ہاتھی، شیر، ستارے اور پہاڑ بھی سجدہ کرتے ہیں۔ اگر قران-الحکیم میں سجدہ کرنے کے معنی بت-پرستوں کی طرح کعبہ کی طرف متھا ٹیکنا ہے تو کیا تم نے یا ڈاقٹر تاہرکادری نے کبھی چاند، ہاتھی، سورج، شیر یا پہاڑ ہمالیہ کو کسی اہل-حدیث، سلفی، وھابی، بریلوی، چڑیلوی یا کسی دیو-بندی یا جن-بندی یا پری-بندی یا نس-بندی مسجد میں داخل ہو کر استنجا کرتے اور پھر وضو کرتے دیکھا ہے، انڈین گآنوں کی طرز پر شرکیہ نعتیں پڑھتے دیکھا ہے، من-گھڑت التحیات اور من-گھڑت درود-ابراھیمی پڑھتے دیکھا ہے، مسجد سے پانی کی ٹوٹیاں اور بجلی کے بلب چراتے دیکھا ہے، پھر چیخ چیخ کر بڑے لؤڈ-سپیکر میں شیعہ یا سنی برانڈ کی من-گھڑت آذان دے کر پتھر اور گارے کے بنے ہوا کعبہ کو سجدے کرتے دیکھا ہے؟ نہیں۔ تو یہ بات صاف ہو گئی کہ قران-الحکیم میں، سجدہ کے معنی اللہ جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کے قوانین کو تذلل کے ساتھ ماننا ہے، اس کے معنی، مکے کے قدیم مشرکوں کی طرح کعبہ کو متھا ٹیکنا نہیں۔ سچ یہ ہے کہ جب اپ، قران میں دیئے ہوۓ اللہ جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کے قوانین اور اخلاقی اصولوں کو ایمانداری سے فالو کرتے ہیں تو اپ حالت-سجود میں ہیں۔ ایک سچا مسلمان ہر وقت حالت-سجود میں ہوتا ہے۔

قران-الکریم کی ایت ۲۴:۴۱ بتاتی ہے کہ پرندے بھی صلاۃ کو فالو کرتے ہیں۔ آگر صلاۃ، نماز ہے تو پرندے کیا شیعہ کی طرح نماز پڑھتے ہیں یا سنی فرقہ کی طرح نماز پڑھتے ہیں؟ پرندے اس مشن اور سٹرائیف کو فالو کرتے ہیں جس کا حکم، اللہ جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ نے انہیں دے رکھا ہے۔ صلاۃ، نماز نہیں ہے۔

A short debate between One Team Member of “Factszz” and a Jaahil Fanatic “Maqbool Ahmad”

Member “Team Factszz”: All historians know that during the life of Prophet Mohammad; neither any Masjid al-Aqsa nor even any Jewish temple existed in Palestine. This point DEBUNKS whole fabricated hadith of Miraaj/Buraq. Masjid al-Aqsa of Palestine was built by Omayyad Caliphs 60 years after the death of Prophet Mohammad. Masjid al-Aqsa of 17:1 exists within Saudi Arabia

Jaahil Fanatic Maqbool Ahmad
All historian also know that Prophet Salman built a mosque, which was also known to Arabs. When Quran mentions masjid aqsa, aqsa means distant in Arabic and Coz it was far away from makkah therefore called so. So yeah when Muslims conquered Jerusalem they built a mosque there and named it the same as mentioned in Quran

Member “Team Factszz“: What you have told is your own fabricated tale which does not have any base at The Fact which is known to all historians is: Jewish temple (which you childishly called Mosque of Solomon) was completely demolished in year 70 CE by Roman General Titus. That means: it was demolished about 500 years before the birth of Last Prophet Mohammad. So, during the life if Prophet Mohammad, no any such Temple existed in Jerusalem. And all historians know that Masjid Aqsa which we see today in Jerusalem was built by Omayyad Caliphs 60 years after the death of Prophet Mohammad.

Ancient Books of Arab Historians show that 1400 years ago, from several beautiful names of city Medina, one name of Medina was “Masjid al-Aqsa”. So Surah 17 and 17:1 points to night journey of Prophet from Mecca to Medina. He never went to Jerusalem. Even the name of She-Camel on which Prophet took ride during that Journey from Mecca to Media was QUSWA, and people who know Arabic Grammar understand that word QUSWA is female name of word AQSA. AQSA mean: remote but Quran has not used mere word Aqsa in 17:1 but have used word Al-Aqsa which means: that is NOUN. In Surah Yasin, Quran has used word Aqsa=Remote. In Yasin, Quran has not used word al-Aqsa. For example: one state of UAE has name “Al-Khaima”. That is name. But if you remove “Al” from Al-Khaima”, then that will be Khaima=Tent

17:1
مِّنَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ إِلَى الْمَسْجِدِ الْأَقْصَى
36:20
وَجَاءَ مِنْ أَقْصَى الْمَدِينَةِ رَجُلٌ يَسْعَىٰ قَالَ يَا قَوْمِ اتَّبِعُوا الْمُرْسَلِينَ

Omayyad built that Mosque in Jerusalem due to their political dispute with Ruler of Mecca Abd-Allah bin Zubayr. Because Omayyad stopped Syrian Muslims to go Mecca for Hajj, because during Hajj, Abd-Allah bin Zubayr used to take oath of loyalty from Syrian Hujjaaj. But Syrian Muslims started to protest that how Omayyad Caliph can stop them from Hajj when Hajj is ordained in Quran. This whole story is given by Arab historians.

Now Omayyad Caliph was in trouble. He called his Employee Chief Mullah Zuhri and told him to forge a hadith which should show that Prophet said, there are two Qibla, and Hajj is valid in Mecca and also in Jerusalem. Then Omayyad built a new Mosque, and later, in order to attach that Mosque to verse 17:1, they named it Masjid al-Aqsa. Then almost for two years, Syrian Muslims were doing their FAKE Hajj in newly built Masjid Aqsa of Jerusalem until Omayyad martyred Abd-Allah bin Zubayr and captured Mecca.

Even Scholars of Saudi Arabia have accepted that all which I have written above. On 13 November 2020, one Saudi Scholar Osama Yamaani published article in which he discussed in detail, and said: Masjid al-Aqsa which exists in Jerusalem has no any relation with Quranic verse 17:1.

You are suggested to read our this page which tells in detail and in depth: how was hadith of Miraj/Buraq forged.

This is the whole Truth but if you want to live in darkness; it is up to you. In one Video (watch?v=9Rj6IYjiKs8). Ilyas with Hamza was telling that, that so called hadith which tell to fight all people of planet until they all become Muslims was valid only during the life of Prophet. He has concocted this false theory himself. Fact is: because Ghamidi has a notorious habit to twist almost all the matters deliberately, so being his student, Ilyas is doing the same. Truth is: so called hadith which tells to fight against people until all People become Muslims is 101% Fabricated, and this kind of hadith could not be told by Rasool because this so called hadith 100% contradict Quranic laws 2:256, 10:99-100, 2:272, 39:41, 6:107, 60:8-9, 2:190, and Rasool could never violate Quranic laws. Rasool was bound to follow only Quran 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 50:45, 28:85, 25:30. Like all other concocted hadiths books; books of “Bukhari and Muslim” are also a pack of fabricated lies. These books contain many many reports which run counter to Quranic laws and ethical codes, and these blasphemous books contain tons of those reports which insult great man 68:4 Mohammad PBUH, and attack Glorious Quran again and again, like a Sunni Goat/Sheep ate verses of stoning. You can read those blasphemous reports in this page.

Prophet and 4 Caliphs left behind only written Quran. They did not leave behind any manuscript of hadiths, Sunnah, Seera, Contexts and Tafsir. So, it is 101% clear that all books of hadiths, Sunnah, Seera, Contexts and Tafsir are fabrications of later time; and these books have no any relation with that Deen Islam which has been finalized in Quran. There was complete ban on writing the hadiths during the life of Prophet and four Caliphs, and you can read tons of books reference in this page.Responding to Ghamidi: under his video “Three aspects of ibadah | اسلام اور عبادت، تین اہم پہلو | Javed Ghamidi| Hassan Ilyas| Ilmo hikmat” at: /watch?/watch?v=9MmFTwgJVc0

You do not know even fundamentals of Quran and Islam. You do not even know that Quran tells: God is Omnipresent . And this makes your all Physical Pooja-Pot=Namaz null and void. Salat is not Namaz. Namaz is just an extension of pre-Quranic Idol worship. You even do not understand verse 22:18 in which we are told that Moons, Sun and Mountains do Sajadah. Have you ever seen any Mountain or Moon placing its forehead on ground toward Kaaba? Sajdah is “humble to Divine law“. If Quran can mention Safa and Marwa, then what was difficult to mention Talbiya “Labaik Allahumma Labbaik” too? Quran has not mentioned it because it confines God to Meccan-Cube but God is Omnipresent. That Talbiya is rite of Pre-Quarnic Mushrikeens. Quran has not mentioned to stone invisible Satan during Hajj nor Quran ordains to walk seven rounds around Cube made of Stones. These are practices of pre-Quranic Meccan-Pagans. Islam is not Madhab=Theocracy but Deen=Divinely Prescribed way of life. This is why: verse 2:177 has told us that Rituals/Namaz are useless and useful is philanthropy, but you have badly tampered translation of verse 2:177 by adding in it your own word “Only“.

Neither Rasool nor four Caliphs left behind any manuscript of Oswat-Hasana, hadiths and Sunnah; so where did you bring that all extra-Quranic stuff from? All Fabricated Tales

Any rite of Hajj which is not given in Quran, is not part of Islamic Hajj. Word Ibadat has root in word Abd like name Abd-Allah (servant of Allah), and a servant does not worship (pooja-pot) his master like idol worshipers but servant obeys orders of his Master, and those orders are given in Quran. You have told stories from hadiths but all hadiths are fabricated because neither Rasool nor four Caliphs left behind any Hadith. There was complete ban on Hadith and Sunnah during the life of Prophet and four Caliphs, and you can read tons of Book references in this page. No any term “Sunanh of Rasool” appears in Quran. Rasool and four Caliphs left behind only Quran. So we have to seek guidance only from Quran; not from fabricated Sunnah and Concocted Hadiths. Rasool was bound to follow only Quran 6:114, 10:15, 6:19. It was not his job to invent his own rites and sharia laws nor he left behind any such extra-Quranic manuscript of his Sharia laws and rites. Rasool and four Caliphs never left behind any manuscript of Oswat-Hasana because his authentic Oswat-Hasana is contained in Quran. This is why: Aisha RA said: The Quran is Akhlaaq of Rasool-Allah. Neither Rasool nor four Caliphs left behind any manuscript of Oswat-Hasana, hadiths and Sunnah; so where did you bring that all extra-Quranic stuff from? All Fabricated Tales. Zakat is economic system of Islam, and tax is minor part of system of Zakat. Quran has not mentioned 2.5% because Quran has left this percentage to Majlis-Shura which can change it according to circumstances. In this video, as usual, you have talked nothing but pure nonsense.Please note that so-called hadith books of Sunni sect are full of those narrations which are narrated by Zuhri and his excellency Abu Hurairah. And Books of Shia sects even stink more. If we read in Bukhari that evil omen is in Horse, Woman and house; then we also read in Nahj-al-Balagha of Shia sect that Women are Scorpions. Never miss to read Biography of his excellency Abu Hurairah at this link.All hadiths are concocted-hearsay-tales, and Concocted Sunnah-tales sprout from concocted hadiths. So, there is NO ANY Difference between so-called hadiths and Sunnah. In other words, concocted stories of Sunnah are daughters of concocted Hadiths. Neither Prophet nor even four caliphs left behind any manuscript of so called Hadiths and Sunnah. They left behind only written Quran. Sunnah and Hadiths are Fabricated Bid’a of Sunni and Shia sects. After landing of Quran; Islam=Quran 6:114, 16:89, Full Stop. Any Islamic law, rite or ritual which does not roots in Glorious Quran, is absolutely not part of Deen al-Islam 17:9, 6:114, 16:89, 28:85, 10:15, 6:19, 25:30. Meaning of “obey Allah and Rasool” is obeying Quran only because Quran makes clear in following verses that Rasool was mere an Agency of Allah Azza wa Jal, and his duty was no more than to deliver Quran clearly 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19Please note that above-posted report is also mentioned in Tabaqat of Ibn S’ad, Mustadrak and in several other books.

مہندس مرزا کو نبی عیسی اور مریم کے بارے میں ہمارا جواب

قران، مبین کتاب ہے اور خود اتھارٹی ہے۔ قران اپنی تصریف کے ذریعے خود اپنی تفسیر کرتا ہے۔ لہذا قران، لونڈے لپاڑے سنی اور شیعہ ملاؤں اور مرزوں اور جاہل اماموں کے اجماع کا محتاج نہیں۔ رہی بات احادیث کی تو خاتم الأنبياء نے، چار خلفاء نے اور تمام صحابہ نے پیچھے ایک صفحہ بھی احادیث کا نہیں چھوڑا۔ سب کی سب احادیث، سنت، سیرت، فقہ، اسباب-نزول اور تفاسیر کی کہانیاں سنی اور شیعہ فرقوں کی من-گھڑت خرافات ہیں۔ قران کی ایت ۵:۱۱۷ میں نبی عیسی طبعی موت مر چکے ہیں اور مردے واپس نہیں اتے۔ مرزا قادیانی ایک فراڈ تھا مگر سنی اور شیعہ مولوی، مرزا قادیانی سے بھی بڑا فراڈ ہیں

نبی عیسی کی زندگی پر ہماری ٹیم نے چالیس سال تحقیق کی ہے۔ سب سے پرانی عیسائیوں کی چار گاسپل میں نہ نبی عیسی کے زندہ اوپر جانے کی نہ دوبارہ واپس انے کی کہانی موجود ہے اور نہ ہی نبی عیسی کی بدون-باپ پیدائش کی کہانی موجود ہے۔ اب یہ ایک کامن-سینس کی بات ہے کہ اگر نبی عیسی کے زندہ اوپر جانے کی اور دوبارہ واپس انے کی کہانی اور نبی عیسی کی بدون-باپ پیدائش کی کہانی صحیح ہوتی تو چار گاسپل اسے کیسے نظر انداز کر سکتی تھیں۔ یہ دونوں کہانیاں چرچ نے صدیوں بعد گاسپلز میں ڈالیں۔ پھر یہ دونوں کہانیاں سنی اور شیعہ کی احادیث کی کتب میں ڈال دی گيئیں اورپھر ان من-گھڑت احادیث کو قران کے ساتھ ری-کنسائل کرنے کے لیے سنی اور شیعہ مترجموں نے ایات کے ترجمہ میں ڈنڈی مارنا شروع کر دی۔

قران کی کوئی ایت یہ نہیں کہتی کہ عیسی بدون باپ کے پیدا ہوئے۔ جب فرشہ نے مریم کو بشارت دی تو اس وقت وہ کنواری تھی۔ مگر اس کا مطلب یہ نہیں کہ بشارت کے بعد انہوں نے شادی ہی نہیں کی۔ ایت ٦٦:۱۲ میں مریم کے لیے أَحْصَنَتْ فَرْجَهَا کے الفاظ ائے ہیں لفظ أَحْصَنَتْ کی ہی ایک اور کنوٹیشن ہے محصنہ۔ زنا کی سزا کے متعلق، سنی فقہ اور احادیث کی تمام کتابوں میں شادی-شدہ عورت کو محصنہ کہا گیا ہے۔ أَحْصَنَتْ فَرْجَهَا کے معنی یہ ہیں کہ مریم نے عصمت کی حفاظت کرنے کے لیے شادی کی اور وہ محصنہ تھی۔ ادم اور عیسی کی مثال یہ بتاتی ہے کہ عیسی بھی دوسرے بنی-ادم کی طرح مٹی ہی تھے۔ قران بتاتا ہے کہ تمام انسان مٹی ہیں اور مٹی میں واپس جاتے ہیں۔ قران یہ بھی بتاتا ہے کہ ہر انسان روح-اللہ ہے

عیسائیوں کی گاسپلز، قران-مجید کے نازل ہونے سے تقریبا چار سو سال پہلے لکھی گيئں اور ان گاسپلز کے پرانے نسخوں میں بار بار نبی عیسی کو مریم اور جوزف یعنی یوسف کا بیالوجیکل بیٹا کہا گیا ہے۔ نبی عیسی کے دور کا مشہور تاریخ-دان جوزیفس بھی لکھتا ہے کہ سب لوگ جانتے تھے کہ عیسی مریم اور جوزف یعنی یوسف کا بیالوجیکل بیٹا ہے۔ گاسپلز کے مطابق مریم کے کم از کم سات بچے تھے اور ان سات بچوں میں پہلے بچے کا نام عیسی تھا۔ قران نے ایت ۳:۳٦ میں بھی مریم کے بچے کے متعلق نہیں بلکہ مریم کے بچوں “بِكَ وَذُرِّيَّتَهَا” کا ذکر کیا ہے

محترم: سنی فرقہ کی دسیوں مشہور کتابوں میں لکھا ہے کہ:

خاتم الأنبياء نے لوگوں کو کہا کہ میرے سے سوائے قران کے کچھ نہ لکھو اور جس نے کچھ پہلے سے میرے سے قران کے سوا لکھ رکھا ہے اسے مٹا دے۔ نبی کے دور میں عرب لکھنے پڑھنے کے قابل تھے مگر، احادیث اور تفاسیر لکھنا منع تھا۔ اس سے ثابت ہوا کہ خاتم الأنبياء نے احادیث سے منع کیا۔

خاتم الأنبياء کی موت کے بعد، حضرت ابوبکر نے خطاب کیا اور کہا۔ جو لوگ محمد کی عبادت کرتے ہیں وہ جان لیں کہ محمد مر چکے ہیں اور جو لوگ الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کی عبادت کرتے ہیں (یعنی اس کے قوانین کو فالو کرتے ہیں) وہ جان لیں کہ الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ زندہ ہے اور ہمیشہ زندہ رہے گا۔ حضرت ابوبکر نے لوگوں کو کہا لاتحدثو۔ یعنی احادیث نریٹ نہیں کرو اور اسلام میں، فیصلے، صرف الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کی کتاب کے مطابق کرو۔ اس سے ثابت ہوا کہ حضرت ابوبکر کے دور میں بھی احادیث غیر-قانونی تھیں۔

حضرت عمر نے تو گویا احادیث پھیلانے والوں کے خلاف اعلان-جنگ کر دیا۔ ابوہریرہ کو احادیث پھیلانے سے سختی سے منع کر دیا۔ سارے لوگوں کو ارڈر دیا کہ جس نے احادیث لکھ رکھی ہیں وہ انہیں میرے ہاں جمعہ کروا دیں۔ لوگوں نے حکم کی تعمیل کی اور سب ایسی تحریریں جمع کروا دیں اور سوچا کہ خلیفہ شائد ایک احادیث کی ماسٹر-کاپی تیار کرنا چاہتے ہیں مگر حضرت عمر نے ان سب کو کھلے میدان میں آگ میں جلا کر کہا کہ یہ احادیث یہود کی من-گھڑت کتاب مشنا تلمود کی طرح ہیں۔ حضرت عمر نے سب گورنروں کر لکھا کہ احادیث کو مٹا دو۔ مگر پھر بھی تین صحابہ ابھی تک لوگوں میں احادیث پھیلا رہے تھے۔ اپ نے ان تینوں کو بلا کر پوچھا، یہ کونسی رسول کی احادیث ہیں جو اپ لوگوں میں پھیلا رہے ہو؟ اس کے بعد حضرت عمر نے ان تینوں کو تاحیات قید میں ڈال دیا۔ ان کی رہائی صرف حضرت عمر کی شہادت کے بعد ہوئی۔ اس تاریخی روایت کو دھبی نے معتبر قرار دیا ہے۔ حضرت عمر نے نبی کی سنت لکھنے سے انکار کر دیا اور کہا خدا کی قسم، دین اسلام کے لیے قران کے سوا میں کسی اور کتاب کی اجازت نہیں دوں گا، اپ نے کہا: لا کتاب معہ کتاب-اللہ۔ اس سے ثابت ہوا کہ حضرت عمر کے دور میں بھی احادیث غیر-قانونی تھیں۔

خلیفہ عثمان نے ابوبکر اور عمر کی پالیسی جاری رکھی۔

حضرت علی نے ایک خطبہ میں لوگوں کو کہا کہ ساری احادیث مٹا دو کیونکہ پہلی قوموں کے ائمہ نے احادیث کی کتب بنائیں اور پھر لوگ الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کی کتاب کو بھول گئے اور احادیث کے پیچھے پڑھ گئے۔ اس سے ثابت ہوا کہ حضرت علی کے دور میں بھی احادیث غیر-قانونی تھیں۔ اور احادیث اب بھی غیر قانونی ہیں۔

نبی اور صحابہ نے صرف لکھا ہوا قران چھوڑا، لہذا قران ہی اسلام ہے، ایسا کوئی مناسک، نماز پوجا-پاٹ اور شریعت کا قانون جس کی جڑ قران میں نہیں ہے وہ اسلام کا حصہ نہیں ہے۔ قران ایت ۲:۱۷۷ میں واضع کرتا ہے کہ نماز، نیکی نہیں ہے۔ اللہ اور رسول کی اطاعت کے معنی صرف یہ ہیں کہ اس کتاب کو فالو کیا جائے جو الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ نے اپنے اخری نبی کے ذریعے ہم تک بھیجی کیونکہ قران، متعدد ایات میں واضع کرتا ہے کہ رسول، الله جَلَّ جَلَالَهُ کے محض ایک نمائدہ تھے ان کے ذمہ صرف قران کو لوگوں تک پہنچانا تھا۔ نبی ابراہیم اور نبی محمد کی صحیح اسوۃ حسنہ قران کے اخلاقی اصولوں میں ضم ہے۔ جب اپ قران کو فالو کرتے ہیں تو اپ، دونوں، اللہ اور رسول کو فالو کرتے ہیں۔ اسی لیے حضرت عائشہ نے کہا تھا کہ قران۔ رسول-اللہ کا اخلاق ہے، القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

قران ۱۷:۹
إِنَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانَ يَهْدِى لِلَّتِى هِىَ أَقْوَمُ وَيُبَشِّرُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَعْمَلُونَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ أَنَّ لَهُمْ أَجْرًا كَبِيرًا

یہ قرآن وہ رستہ دکھاتا ہے جو سب سے سیدھا ہے اور مومنوں کو جو نیک عمل کرتے ہیں بشارت دیتا ہے کہ اُن کے لئے اجر عظیم ہے

ہم نے جتنے دلائل دیئے ہیں اپ ان کے حوالاجات کے لیے اصلی عربی-کتب کی فوٹو کاپی ہمارے “سنت اور حدیث کی صحیح تاریخ” کے صفحہ پر پڑھ سکتے ہیں۔

Responding to Mr. Ghamidi for his video “Was IBLEES Really Commanded to Prostrate | ابلیس کو سجدے کا حکم نہیں ہوا ؟ | By Javed Ahmad Ghamid” – Uploaded by “Nafs-e-ZAKKI”

Noble Quran is the most beautiful book as it fully explains itself through its own built-in Tasreef which means: verses are interconnected like brain neurons, and in this way, verses explain each other in multifaceted forms. This is the reason: neither Prophet Mohammad PBUH nor any his Sahaabi left behind any manuscript of Hadiths, Sunnah and Tafsir because they were aware that Quran explains itself; so additional books are not needed to support the Quran. Otherwise; it was not difficult for 4 Caliphs to compile a Book of Hadith Sunnah and Tafsir, but they did not. They left behind only written Quran.

But, because, instead of understanding Quran only through its own Tasreef; Sunni and Shia Imams started to SUPERIMPOSE stories of concocted Hadiths on Quran; so they are failed to understand the Quran correctly even in past 1200 years.

It is 100% clear in verses 55:6, 22:18 and in several other verses that in Quran, meaning of Sajadah is “humble to” and same meaning come from the Roots of word Sajadah (consult any Ancient Arabic Lexicon). Verse 22:18 tells us that even Mountain Himalaya do Sajadah and Star, Sun and Moon also do Sjadah. But have you ever seen Sun Moon and Mountain Himalaya entering in any Mosque, doing Astanja, then doing Wudhu and then shouting in Loudspeaker non-Quranic Azan, and then placing its forehead on ground toward Kaaba? No. Sun Moon and Mountains humble to Divine law. They are bidden to follow what Lord of Universe has told them to follow.

In the same way, Iblees was ordered “to humble to/Obey” Adam/human but due to his arrogance, he refused. So was rejected by God.In whole Quran, you will not see any verse which tells you to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba. No any verses tells that Placing forehead on ground toward Kaaba is part of Quranic Salat. Salat is NEVER 5 Namaz. Namaz is made up by Imams and it is IDOL WORSHIP >> Prostrating to Cube made of Stones and Cement.

کسی بھی قسم کا سجدہ جس میں انسان زمین پر کسی بت یا کسی مخصوص عمارت کی طرف اپنا متھا ٹیکتا ہے سو فیصد شرک ہے خواہ ایسا جسمانی سجدہ کسی قبر کی طرف ہو یا کعبہ کی ف ہو جو کہ پتھر اور سیمنٹ سے بنا ہوا ہے۔ ایسے سجدے کرنا بت-پرستوں کا کام ہے۔ قرآن-مجید میں سجدہ کا معنی کبھی بھی کسی مکعب نما عمارت یا کسی اور عمارت کو جسمانی طور پر سجدہ کرنا نہیں ہے بلکہ اس کے معنی ہیں: قانون الٰہی کو عاجزی سے قبول کر لینا ہے، اور یہ نکتہ قرآن مجید کی متعدد آیات 55:6, 22:18 اور متعدد دوسری ایات میں بھی بالکل واضح کر دیا گیا ہے۔ اگر اپ کسی پرانی عربی کی لغات کی کتاب دیکھیں تو اس میں بھی سجدہ کے بنیادی معنی تذلل یعنی قانون-الہی کے آگے جھک جانا ہے۔ جب اپ خدا کے قانون کے اگے جھکتے ہوئے اپنا وعدہ نہیں توڑتے، جھوٹ نہیں بولتے، زنا نہیں کرتے تو اپ سجود کی ہی حالت میں ہیں۔ قرآن کے مطابق، پہاڑ بھی سجدہ کرتے ہیں ۲۲:۱۸ ۔ مگر کیا آپ نے کبھی پہاڑ ہمالیہ کو کسی مسجد میں داخل ہوتے اور بت پرستوں کی طرح اپنی پیشانی کعبہ کی طرف زمین پر رکھتے ہوئے دیکھا ہے؟ نہیں، ابلیس کو بھی “آدم کے لیے “عاجز ہونے” کا حکم دیا گیا تھا لیکن اس نے انکار کیا، اور اس لیے اسے مسترد کر دیا گیا۔ قرآنی صلاۃ کسی قسم کی نماز نہیں ہے۔ پانچ نماز جو ایرانی زرتشتیوں پارسیوں سے درآمد کی گئیں تھیں اور پھر اڑنے والے گدھے “براق” کی حدیث کی جعلسازی کے ذریعے ان کی توثیق کی گئیں تھی خالص بت پرستی ہیں۔ ہندو، شیوا کے بت کی پوجا کرتے ہیں، اور سنی/شیعوں نے کعبہ کو بت میں تبدیل کر دیا ہے۔ کہیں بھی قرآن-الحکیم ہمیں جسمانی طور پر کعبہ کو سجدہ کرنے کا حکم نہیں دیتا۔ کہیں نہیں۔ ہم قرآن کا ایک ایک لفظ جانتے ہیں۔ کہیں بھی قران نہیں بتاتا کہ جسمانی سجدہ، صلاۃ کا حصہ ہے۔ قران متعدد ایات میں واضع کرتا ہے کہ خدا اومنی-پریذینٹ ہے یعنی ہر جگہ موجود ہے اور کسی مسجد مندر کنیسا یا کعبہ تک محدود نہیں ہے۔ جدھر بھی اپنا چہرہ موڑیں وہاں خدا موجود ہے۔ اپ اگر کسی گہری کھائی میں چل رہے ہیں یا ہمالیہ کی چوٹی پر کھڑے ہیں خدا اپ کے ساتھ ہے اور ساتھ بھی ایسے کہ وہ اپ سے اپ کی شاہ رگ سے بھی زیادہ قریب ہے

وَلِلَّهِ ٱلْمَشْرِقُ وَٱلْمَغْرِبُ فَأَيْنَمَا تُوَلُّوا۟ فَثَمَّ وَجْهُ ٱللَّهِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ وَٰسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ
وَهُوَ مَعَكُمْ أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُمْ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ
وَلَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا ٱلْإِنسَـٰنَ وَنَعْلَمُ مَا تُوَسْوِسُ بِهِۦ نَفْسُهُۥ وَنَحْنُ أَقْرَبُ إِلَيْهِ مِنْ حَبْلِ ٱلْوَرِيدِ

قرآنی صلاۃ کیا ہے یہ جاننے کے لیے ہمارا یہ صفحہ پڑھیں

اسجدوا فسجدوا سجدا مسجد السجود المسجد والمسجد واسجدى يسجدون سجدوا السجدين تسجد سجدين مسجدا لمسجد السجدون يسجد فسجد لأسجد ءأسجد ومسجد واسجدوا أنسجد يسجدوا ساجدا تسجدوا فاسجدوا يسجدان فاسجد واسجدIt is clear to all men of understanding that Last Prophet “Prophet Mohammad PBUH” and Four Caliphs left behind only written Quran. They left behind no any manuscript of so-called Sunnah, Hadiths, Fiqh, Asbab-Nazool, Seera, and Tafsir. Therefore; this kind of all extra-Quranic books are nothing but Bid’a, and this kind of man-made books cannot be part of Deen Islam. We are ready to accept that report of Sunnah or Hadith which was “IN PERSON” certified as Sahih by Prophet or at least if such report was certified IN PERSON as Sahih by four Caliphs. But do we find any such extra-Quranic report? No. Not even one. Therefore; morally, logically, rationally and legally such hearsay stories of Sunnah, Hadiths, Contexts and Tafsir cannot be classified as Sahih (authentic). If not authentic, then are inauthentic. Now, question arises: should we build our faith and five Namaz (pooja-pot) on Inauthentic stories? Of Course not. We can conclude: “Any Islamic Law (Sharia law), Rite or Pooja-Pot-Namaz which does not have roots in Noble Quran, is absolutely not part of Deen Islam”Being Muslims, we must and we do respect and honor all prophets and Messengers of Allah Azza Jal, and we do not make any distinction among them 3:84 because they all preached same Deen “al-Islam” 3:19, 3:85, 42:13. However, Quran makes very clear that role of Rasool was no more than a Divine Postman and he was mere an Agency of Allah Jalla Aala 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19. His sole duty was to deliver Quran, and go back. It is authority of God, that he could choose any other Postman to deliver Quran if He had willed. It was not duty of Rasool to invent his Sunnah and Hadith nor ever he invented but Sunni and Shia heretical Imams invented those Kharafaat centuries after the death of Prophet when Prophet, 4 Caliphs and all Sahaaba (Companions of Prophet) were already died, and no one was present to confirm those hadith-stories as Sahih which were attached to their names through fake Chains/Isnaad after year 722 CE. Sunni and Shia Imams fabricated their Sunnah and Hadiths in order to twist and tamper meaning of Quranic verses as they wish. It happened with us several times that during debates when we told Sunni debaters that this and that verse of Quran says so and so; then that heretic immediately responded: but his hadith tells this and Imam Ibn Kathir said this. He just ignored our Quranic reference.Please also note that Ibn Kathir was that utterly Jaahil Shami Mullah who wrote in his Tafsir that this planet earth is being lifted by a big bull who has 40000 horns. Whenever we quote any verse of Quran to a Sunni heretic; he immediacy respond: but Ibn Kathir has said so and so. It seems, that Jaahil Shami Mullah Ibn Kathir copied that story of Bull from a Book of Hindus, reference: Atharva Veda 4:11.1-2. Ibn Kathir is favorite Imam of one South Asian Pseudo-Mullah “Tarik Jameel”. In his funny speeches, Tarik Jameel always quotes Ibn Kathir. In one speech he was telling that Marriage Waleema of Isa/Jesus was held in Paradise and millions people attended his Waleema, and his audience were chanting, Subhan-Allah, Subhan-Allah! But you can judge degree of Ignorance of South Asian Muslims by this point: that this shameless story-teller Mullah Tarik Jameel has millions of subscribers at YouTube, and that Pseudo Mullah is also consulted by Prime Minsters of Pak. On the contrary, Mr. Ghamidi has much better approach in religion than those south Asian Mullahs but he was under so big threat that he left his homeland. One South Asian Mullah gave ad that read  Surah al-Kouthr on petrol tank of your motor cycle, and your motor cycle will have better mileage (Barkat ho gi). So, they use Quran in this way. On the contrary, may be, same Mullah never understood whole Quran in his life. It is pity that instead of following made-easy 54:40 Quran directly, these Jaahils run after Jaahil Mullahs and run after fabricated stories of Sunnah and hadiths whole life. It is so sad.Once a member of our team was debating a Sunni heretic about punishment of Rajam (stoning to death). Our member asked that Sunni that Quran is a big book but we do not see any verse which ordains to stone a married Zani; so, where did you infidels bring that story of Rajam from? He said that his hadith books say that verse of Rajam was revealed but a sheep ate that verse. (what a moronic nonsense). Then our member said to that Sunni-Mushrik that Allah Azza wa Jal says in 15:9, 17:88, 41:42 that He Himself is protector of Quran; so, do you believe that your Sunni-Sheep of Zoroastrian hypocrite Ibn Majah 1944 was more powerful than Who has sent down this Quran 15:9? Now, that heretic was on fire; and he cried loudly: you are denying Hadith of Rasool, and he declared our team member the greatest Kaafir of all times, and fled debate. Some Followers of Talmud like Rabbi K’ab al-Ahbar who became Pseudo Muslims in order to harm Islam, have also forged this kind of funny hadiths in order to blend Talmudic Punishment of Rajam in Islam; and Zoroastrian Pseudo Hadiths Imams like Bukhari has added this kind of Kharafaats happily in his Book. One such fabricated hadith shows that monkeys were stoning another monkey, and in this way: monkeys were punishing that monkey by stoning because that monkey committed Zina with another monkey. Now, this Insane Zoroastrian Hadith Forger Bukhari is telling us that Monkeys also follow concocted Sharia of Shia and Sunni infidels. Please note: That book of Bukhari is loved by Sunni Mullahs and by Mr. Ghamidi too. In his books Mr. Ghamidi has quoted countless fabricated hadiths from Bukhari.   Truth is: that hadith of Rajam was forged by those Pseudo Jewish Converts like Rabbi K’ab al-Ah’bar, Rabbi Wahb bin Munibbah and others in order to blend stoning punishment of their concocted book “Talmud” in Islam. In Glorious Quran, punishment of a Zani is 100 stripes regardless if Zani is married or unmarried 24:2. Also, please read this so called Hadith but make sure that your daughters and sisters are at least one kilometer away from you. We do not know if Mr. Ghamidi loves this so-called hadith or not but Halwa-Khor Obese-Fatty Mullahs like Diesel and Tarik Jameel, for sure, love this so-called hadith tooooooooo much! And his excellency Abu Hurairah and Zoro-Bukhari tell us that drilling-power of Prophet Solomon was even more than the latest robotic drill of today. In order to view that drilling-power of Prophet Solomon, Zoro-Bukhari has enlightened us in these three reports, Report# 01, Report #02, and Report# 03. We do hope, after reading these three so beautiful reports, Mr. Ghamidi and his all Students and Followers will also assess their own drilling powers! Please note: that Sunni Mullahs and Mr. Ghamidi too, love book of Bukhari toooooo much (which is full of blasphemous Kharafaats). We read in favorite books of Mr. Ghamidi, Sahih-Muslim and al-Bukhari that “Chuhay Yahoodio’o ka aik Qabeela hei’n”. We beg to request Mr. Ghamidi to send some rats to any trustworthy lab in order to test their DNA. We hope: after receiving DNA results, Mr. Ghamidi will tell us about the result in his new video that if Lab result are matched with the rats report of two Forensic DNA Analysts of 9th century Bukhari and Muslim bin Hajaj! We read also in Book of Zoro Bukhari that “Evil Omen is in House Woman and Horse”. And Shia Pseudo Imams took further step, and in their forged book Nahj-al-Balagha we read that Caliph Ali said: Women are Scorpions. Now, point is: could Prophet Mohammad use this kind of derogatory words against women when Prophet’s own mother and wife were also women? Could Wise-Man Ali say, that Women are Scorpion when his own wife Bibi Fatimah (Radi Allah Anha) was a woman? An honest person even with half-brain can assess easily from the contents of these books that these all books of Sunnah and Hadiths are fabrications which were forged by enemies of Islam like defeated Zoroastrians and Jealous People of Book. in order to ridicule last and final Prophet of Deen Islam, Mohammad PBUH. Sunni Mullahs and Mr. Ghamidi too, love Bukhari but it was much better for them to love Aalu-Bukhara instead of loving Bukhari. Bring to us any hadith which was IN PERSON certified as Sahih by Rasool or at least by 4 Caliphs, and we will accept it immediately but there no such hadith; not even one. Therefore; to classify this kind of fabricated stock into 65 categories does not make any sense. Those all the 65 categories cannot be classified as Sahih reports. Those all are hearsay concocted tales, and faith & five daily rituals (pooja-pot) cannot be built on such concocted hocus pocus. Do you think, Mr. Ghamidi: that the great man 68:4 Mohammad PBUH had told this kind of hadiths! Truth is: these Pseudo hadith Imams were hypocrites of superlative degree, and they fabricated this kind of Hadiths with fake Chains (Isnaad)In one report, Bukhari tells that who will commit suicide by throwing himself from a mountain will burn in Hell but in his same evil book, Bukhari writes that Prophet Mohammad attempted several suicides by dropping himself from a mountain. Read 68:4. Was this Bukhari even a Muslim! Can a Muslim author stuff his book with this kind of Kharafaats! Zoro hadith-forger Abu Dawud writes in 0066 that if in a water-well, garbage, dead dogs and menses blood of women is floating; water of that well is still clean and is fit for Wudu/Ablution. This Stinky hypocrite forged this report so that Muslims should put menses blood and dead dogs in their mouth because during Wudu, Namaz-lovers also put water in their mouth. Is there any doubt left even now, that those pseudo hadith Imams were indeed hypocrites of Batni Tehreek, and Persian historian Kazimzada has admitted that their Zoro Ancestors did so to harm Islam. We read in Bukhari that woman is manufactured from the Crooked Rib of Adam. So Crookedness is built-in Characteristic in woman; therefore; leave her as she is, otherwise if you will try to straighten her, she might break. We find tons of forged hadiths in books of Sunni and Shia heretics which demean, insult and demonize woman who is mother of humanity; who is first kindest teacher of man; who is mother and sister and loving wife. These hadith forger Imams copied that tale of Crooked Rib from corrupted Torah, Genesis 2:22. Tibetan Scrolls are much more reliable historical documents than four anonymous gospels of Pauline-Christians. In those Scrolls, we read Sermon of Isa/Jesus in which he said:

“She (woman) gives you birth amid suffering by the sweat of her brow. She watched over your growth, and until her death you cause her the most intense anguish. Bless her and adore her, for she is your only friend and support on earth. Respect her, protect her; in doing this, you will win her love and her heart, and you will be pleasing God; for this shall many of your sins be remitted. Therefore; I say to you: after God, your best thoughts should belong to woman and to wives; woman being to you the Divine Temple wherein you shall most easily obtain perfect happiness”Once we told a Sunni heretic that Quran makes clear in several verses that on the day of judgment, no one will bear the burden of any other person but that Sunni Infidel responded: but Sahih-Muslim says that on the day of Judgement, all sins of Muslims will be placed on the heads of Jews and Christians. So, hypocrite author of Sahih-Muslim is indeed giving crypto message to Muslims that you guys are free to commit all kinds of sins and crimes because finally, your all sins will be shifted to heads of Jews and Christians. Here a person with healthy brain can easily judge that indeed these forged books of Sunnah and Hadiths are the greatest conspiracy against Quran=Islam. Same author of Sahih-Muslim enlightens us with this great info that all black dogs are Devil. Since we have read this so-called Hadith of Black-dog, we have painted our dog in yellow color. and now our dog is no longer a Devil but there is now another problem, which is: when we go on daily walk-dog; people start to shout, Taxi Taxi! There is tons of historical evidence which shows that Rasool forbade to write his hadiths and four caliphs placed ban on the writing and spreading stories of Sunnah and Hadith. You can read its proof in this page. In fact meaning of Rasool is Postman Word Rasool has roots in word Rislaala. Meaning of Risaala is Message and also letter/book which postman delivers. But Rasool was not a Postman like our Postman in our cities but he was Divine Postman, and it is great honor to be a Divine Postman = An Agency of God.By blindly following his Teachers who were mere typical South Asian Mullahs and by following Oldi-Ignoramus Imams like Zaydi Shia Abu Hanifa, Sodomite Malik, Sodomite Shia Shafi’i and Hanbal, Mr. Ghamidi tells his students and he himself also tells in his all videos that Mortal Man Mohammad is only the Source of Deen Islam. We are not giving any Fatwa nor we like it so but according our well-measured opinion: to say that Mohammad is Only Source of Deen, is 100 Kufr and 101% Shirk. After landing of Quran, Source of guidance 2:2 and Deen is only and only that Divine Book which Allah Azza wa Jal delivered to we people through his Postman=Rasool, and name of that Book is Quran only 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 50:45. So, Source of Deen is only Quran; not Divine Postman who delivered Book and died 1400 years ago. By following his teachers and Oldi-Imams; Mr. Ghamidi and his brain-dead blind-follower-Students repeat their Shirkia nonsensical irrational rant in almost every video with full-fledged stubbornness that a mortal man 18:110 who died 1400 years ago “Mohammad PBUH” gave Mr. Ghamidi and his braindead students two things, Quran and Sunnah. To say so is also 101% Shirk because truth is: it is only the Quran which God delivered to we people through his Agency=Rasool 6:19, 6:114, 10:15, 25:30. Rasool and 4 Caliphs did not deliver any manuscript of so-called Hadiths and Sunnah. Terms “Hadith and Sunnah” are invented by Sunni and Shia heretical sects. Quran never permits sects in Islam 3:103, 3:105, 6:159, 23:52..23:54 30:31-32, 42:13. According to these verses, Sunni and Shia are out from the fold of Islam. According to 6:159, Sunni and Shia are those Kharijites who took exit from Islam by making sects. From Adam to Mohammad, God has named all true followers of all prophets only Muslim 22:78; not Sunni, Shia, Salafi, Ahle-Hadith, Wahabi, Brailvi, DeoBandi, PariBandi, JinnBandi, NasBandi, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i and Hanbali. Verse 3:103 forbids all kind of split, grouping and division in one Muslim Ummah. Some hypo try to hide these divisions/split under a term “school of thought” but if a Swine takes Skin of a Cow; It is still a Swine. After completing his great mission which was delivery of Quran clearly; Rasool died 1400 years ago. After his death, his chapter on this planet was closed. Now, in order to follow legacy of Rasool we must follow that Divine book which Rasool left behind for us, and name of that book is Quran only 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 25:30. A Muslim is absolutely not in need of to know about Prophet Mohammad more than what is given in Quran. We must be Muslims 22:78; not Mushrik Mohammedans who tend to equate mortal man Mohammad PBUH to God 3:80. For example: Quran makes clear that Only Allah al-Kabeer knows about Ilm Ghaiyb and Quran also tells that Prophet did not know Ilm-Ghayb. Now, it is clear here that to know Ghaiyb is SIFT of only Allah Jalla Aala. If any one attaches that SIFT with any Human; he is committing 101% Shirk 4:48. Now go to South Asia, and ask one hundred Mullahs that did Prophet know Ghaiyb? They all will say: yes. If you will tell them the Truth; they will file a case of Toheen-e-Risalaat against you, and judges of that Country will be very happy to pass against you the verdict of death penalty because that whole society is indeed NEVER of Muslims but of Mushrik Mohammedans. We hope you remember terrorist Mumtaz Qadri and volume of his funeral. In the same way, during making Islamic law, if some places man-made books of so-called Hadiths and Sunnah and Tafsir beside Book of Allah Azza wa Jal; that will be concomitant to make partners with God, and that is Shirk 4:48, 5:44, 6:114. Mr. Ghamidi took very good decision to leave that land of Mushrik Mohammedans otherwise Mr. Ghamidi might have been in Paradise today.Attention Mr. Ghamidi and his all Students and his all followers and his all Mureed:

Did Rasool “IN PERSON” certify any extra-Quranic Hadith as Sahih? No

Did four Caliphs “IN PERSON” certify any extra-Quranic Hadith as Sahih? No

Did Rasool and 4 Caliphs leave behind any manuscript of extra-Quranic hadiths? No

Rasool said: do not write from me any thing except Quran, and anyone who have already written from me in addition to Quran, must delete it (Darimi, Ibn Hanbal, Khatib al-Baghdadi in Taqyid, Mustadrak, Sahih Ibn Hibban, and many others)

Caliph Umar burned and banned all hadiths (Tabaqat Ibn S’ad, Taqyid, Dhahabi and others)

Caliph Umar RA refused to write Sunnah of Rasool and said: By God: In Deen, I will not allow other books beside Book of God (Madkhal Sunan al-Kubra – Bayhaqi, Musannaf Abd-ar-Razaaq, Insaab al-Ashraaf, Masnad Ishaq bin Rahwia (he was teacher of Bukhari), Jamia Bayan of Ibn Barr, Tarikh al-Khulafa by Suyuti, Tabaqat Ibn S’ad, Taqyid of Baghdadi, Fiqah seera by Mohammad Al-Ghazali)

Caliph Umar RA placed three Companions of Prophet Mohammad under house arrest FOR LIFE due to their Hadith-Mongering (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah, Tarikh al-Islam by Dhahabi, Zikr al-Aqran by Ibn Hayaan, Tarikh al-Halb by Ibn al-Adeem, Sharha As’hab-al-Hadith by Khatib Baghadadi, Mustadrak of al-Hakim, Seert al-Alaam Al-Nubala of Dhahabi, Tarikh Damishq by Ibn Asakir, Mu’jam al-Awsat by Tabarani)

Caliph Umar RA wrote letters to all city governors to erase all hadiths. Same was said by Caliph Ali RA in his one sermon. Abu Bakar RA also told Muslims “La Tuhadithu – Do not narrate hadiths.

So, if Mr. Ghamidi was living in the era of Caliph Umar, then what could have happened with Mr. Ghamidi?

We do not talk without solid evidence. In order to read all above-given Scanned-Books references, please read our page “True History of Hadiths and Sunnah“. That page contains scanned pages of original Arabic books.Quran 17:9 VERILY, this Qur’an shows the way to all that is most upright, and gives the believers who do good deeds the glad tiding that theirs will be a great reward.
Salat is not Namaz. Namaz is 100% Idol worship. Hindu prostrate to Idol of Shiva, and Sunni and Shia sects have converted Kaaba into an Idol. Noble Quran tells us function of Kaaba in verses 5:95, 5:97, and those functions have to do nothing with Five Namaz and with Prostrating to Kaaba which is made of Stones and Cement. It was a habit of Meccan Pagans to prostrate to stones.  Prostration to Stones is 101% Shirk 4:48. Stop that your Bid’a of “Sunnah and Hadiths”; and just follow all Ethical Codes and Laws of Glorious Quran Sincerely. That’s it. This is Siraat-Mustaqeem”Quran has made clear in 2:177 that Rituals facing Kaaba (like five Namaz) are Not Good Deed. Salat is not Namaz. Namaz was imported from Zoroastrians. If Salat was Namaz; then Quran could have told us at least number of Rakat of your five Parsi Namaz? Quran even nowhere tells that prostrating to Kaaba is part of Salat nor Quran ordains to prostrate to Kaaba (Iike Pre-Quranic Pagans). There is no any rational Content in your whole video. How can you attach your own-made Figure of 89% with Quran; when God says in 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, that his Quran explains every thing which is part of Islam? And according to 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, Rasool and all Muslims are BOUND to follow Only Quran, in Deen Islam. What Milat-Ibrahim should follow is given in Quran. And Rasool left only Quran. No any other manuscript. You are not permitted to make hearsay man-made stories, part of Milat-Ibrahimi.Nowhere Quran ordains that on the day of Hajj, all Muslims of this planet should slaughter billions of animals. This is Bid’a of Sectarian Imams. Rasool was BOUND to follow Book of Allah. It was not his duty to invent his sunnah and Hadith nor he ever invented 5:44-48, 12:106, 42:10, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 39:13, 50:45, 16:116, 10:59-60, 7:32, 7:2-3, 11:18, 66:1, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 3:80, 18:110, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20, 2:213, 16:64, 24:54, 36:17, 13:40, 16:35, 16:82, 64:12, 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 25:30, 25:33, 29:51, 45:6, 46:9, 28:85, 42:15, 2:159, 7:157, 47:2. In short; any rite, Ritual or Islamic law which does not have roots in Noble Quran is ABSOLUTELY NOT PART of Deen Islam

Quran is pretty big book. Did Quran forget to mention your two Eids, and number of Rakats of your Parsi five Namaz? Eids are Muslim Festivals; and Quran does not ban a Festival which does not violate Codes and laws of Quran. Eids are NOT part of Deen Islam but part of Muslim Culture. And Salat is not Namaz. All what you have said in this video is 101% Irrational and it has nothing to do with Deen Islam which has been finalized in Glorious Quran

Quran has ignored Rites of Pagans like kissing Black stone, walking 7 rounds around Cube which is made of Stones and Cement, and throwing tiny stones on invisible Satan. If Quran can mention rite of Safa and Marwa; then why did Quran not mention rites of kissing Black stone, walking 7 rounds around Cube which is made of Stones and Cement, and throwing tiny stones on invisible Satan?

Before landing of Quran, Pagan Arab were also doing Haj. All rites of Hajj which are given in Quran are rites of Islamic Hajj. All rites which are not given in Quran are not rites of Islamic Hajj. That’s it. It is so simple. Then why do you need so called concocted Sunnah and Concocted Hadiths?

You do not need to make long stories about Ramadan. In Quran, during Ramadan; Fasting is from Dawn to Dusk, and Quran forbids to sleep with wife during fasting. That’s it. Why are you making so long stories about Fasting then? Why do you need fake Sunnah and Concocted hadiths in this regard?Terms “Sunnah and Hadiths” are innovations of Sunni and Shia Imams. Nowhere term “Sunnah of Rasool” appears in Quran nor Quran tells to follow Sunnah of Mortal Man 18:110 Mohammad PBUH. Quran tells: It is not job of Rasool to guide people 2:272, 72:21 but his Sole Only duty was to deliver Quran clearly 29:18, 5:99, 3:20, 42:48. So, what Hadith and what Sunnah?

You are trying to prove by countless lame arguments that 2+2=5, but you will never be able to prove so. Hikma is Wisdom that was given to all Prophets, so that they should be able to deliver message of Book of Allah even to highly tyrant people.

So, near you, Shah Wali Ullah was a Bigg Scholar? Wow. Truth is: he was just another typical Jaahil Mullah of South Asia. Should you seek guidance from Quran 54:40, 6:114 (which Rasool Only left behind) or Shah Wali Ullah?

No any term “Sunnah of Rasool” appears in whole Quran nor any verse of Quran ordains Muslims to follow Sunnah of Mortal man 18:110 Mohammad PBUH; nor Rasool and 4 Caliphs left behind any manuscript of Sunnah and Hadith along with Quran. If you make a million Parts of this video on this subject; you are talking in vain, and your shallow argument carries no any Rational weight; not at all. It was not Job of Rasool to guide People 2:272, 72:21; then what Sunnah and What Hadiths? You are wasting your own time, and wasting time of people who watch your totally Irrational Videos.In Quran, term Oswat-Hasana appears for Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Mohammad but did Ibrahim or Mohammad leave behind for you any manuscript of their Oswat-Hasana? No. Did four Caliphs leave behind any manuscript of Oswat-Hasana for you? No. They were not in need of leaving behind any manuscript of Oswat Hasana because Authentic Oswat-Hasana of Rasool exists only within Quran. This is why: Aisha RA also said that “The Quran is Akhlaaq of Rasool-Allah”.
القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

The Bid’a of Sunnah, Hadiths, Contexts and Tafsir are Product of Sectarian Imams.

Islam is simple:
After landing of Quran; Islam is to follow all laws and ethical codes of Quran, sincerely. That’s it. This is the Pristine Islam. Meaning of “Obey Allah and Rasool” is to follow Quran only because Rasool left behind Quran only, and Rasool was mere AN AGENCY of God, and his duty was NO MORE THAN to deliver Quran clearly to people, and this point is made very clear in several verses of Quran 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19.

Any rite, Ritual or Islamic law which does not have roots in Quran is absolutely not part of Deen Islam

If you make a million Parts of this video on this subject; you are talking in vain, and your totally shallow-argument carries no any Rational weight; not at all. If you launch another billion videos to prove 2+2=5; you will not be able to prove it.

غامدی صاحب: ایک ویڈیو میں، روزے کے بند ہونے کے ٹائم پر کھانے پینے کو جاری رکھنے یا نہ جاری رکھنے کے مسئلہ پر مسٹر ابو ہریرہ کی ایک رویت سنا رہے تھے تو ہمارے ایک ممبر نے غامدی صاحب کے ایک چاہنے والے کو یہ جواب دیا۔

لیجئیے جناب، ہم اپ سے دلیل کے ساتھ بات کرتے ہیں۔ امید ہے اپ ناراض نہیں ہوں گے۔ یہ ایک سیدھی سی بات ہے کہ ایک بالغ مسلمان کی یہ ذمہ-داری ہے کہ وہ روزہ بند ہونے سے پہلے کھانا پینا چھوڑ دے۔ اب اس سیدھی سادھی بات کو سمجھنے کے لیے جناب غامدی صاحب کو بھلا مسٹر ابوہریرہ کی سٹوری سنانے کی کیا ضروت تھی؟ اہم سوال یہ ہے۔ کہ کیا ذاتی طور پر، خاتم الأنبياء عليه السلام نے یا ذاتی طور چار خلفاء راشدین رضي الله عنهم نے مسٹر ابوہریرہ کی اس بتائی ہوئی سٹوری کے صحیح ہونے کی تصدیق کی تھی؟ نہیں کی تھی۔ لہذا ایسی غیرمصدقہ روایات اور قصے کہانیوں کو سچ مان لینے کا کیا تک بنتا ہے جناب؟ سب جانتے ہیں کہ شیعہ فرقہ مسٹر ابوہریرہ کے بہت خلاف ہے۔ مگر سنی فرقہ کی بہت سی مشہور کتابوں میں بھی لکھا ہے کہ اماں عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا اور حضرت عمر رضي الله عنه نے مسٹر ابوہریرہ کو ایک بھکاری، ایک خائن چور اور حدیث-فورجر کہا جو من-گھڑت حدیثیں لوگوں کو سناتا تھا۔ یہ بات طبقات ابن-سعد اور بہت سی دوسری کتابوں میں بھی لکھی ہے کہ حضرت عمر رضي الله عنه نے مسٹر ابوہریرہ کو درے سے اتنا پیٹا کہ ان کے بدن سے خون نکلنے لگا۔ اب ایک کامن-سینس کی بات ہے کہ کیا اپ کو ایسے شخص کی من-گھڑت کہانیوں پر اپنے ایمان کی تعمیر کرنی چاہیے؟
جناب غامدی صاحب خود بھی جانتے ہیں کہ مسٹر ابوہریرہ کی جو سٹوری انہوں نے سنائی ہے وہ قابل-اعتبار نہیں ہے۔ مگر آجکل جناب غامدی صاحب حدیثیں بہت ہی زیادہ اس لیے سنا رہے ہیں تاکہ جنوبی ایشیا کے مولوی، ان کو منکر-حدیث کہنا بند کردیں۔ حالانکہ سچ یہ ہے کہ نہ تو نبی-کریم نے اور نہ ہی کسی بھی صحابی نے پیچھے کوئی بھی تحریر سنت، حدیث، تفسیر یا اسباب-نزول کی چھوڑی۔ ایسی کتب سنی اور شیعہ فرقوں کی ایجاد ہیں۔

أَفَغَيْرَ ٱللَّهِ أَبْتَغِى حَكَمًا وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِىٓ أَنزَلَ إِلَيْكُمُ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ مُفَصَّلًا وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاتَيْنَـٰهُمُ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ يَعْلَمُونَ أَنَّهُۥ مُنَزَّلٌ مِّن رَّبِّكَ بِٱلْحَقِّ فَلَا تَكُونَنَّ مِنَ ٱلْمُمْتَرِينَ

نَّحْنُ أَعْلَمُ بِمَا يَقُولُونَ وَمَآ أَنتَ عَلَيْهِم بِجَبَّارٍ فَذَكِّرْ بِٱلْقُرْءَانِ مَن يَخَافُ وَعِيدِ

وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ تِبْيَـٰنًا لِّكُلِّ شَىْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً وَبُشْرَىٰ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ

أَوَلَمْ يَكْفِهِمْ أَنَّآ أَنزَلْنَا عَلَيْكَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ يُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِمْ إِنَّ فِى ذَٰلِكَ لَرَحْمَةً وَذِكْرَىٰ لِقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ

People who fast are Adult, and it is their responsibility to detect the time when Dawn starts, and this is also their Responsivity to manage their food program in a way to finish eating/drinking before the time when Dawn starts. This is very simple. This is a matter of basic commonsense. So, You were absolutely not in need of telling stories of concocted hadiths to people on this subject. For example, if Dawn starts at 5:00 AM; this is man’s responsibility to finish eating/drinking before 5:00 AM. For whole Ramadan, we have been fasting from decades, and we always finished eating/drinking at least 5 minutes before Dawn.

We know, Shia sect is against Abu Hurairah but it is written even in top well-known books of Sunni sect that Caliphs Umar RA and Aisha RA called Abu Hurairah a hadith-forger, and a person who stole money from Islamic Treasury. It is written that Caliph Umar RA beat back of Abu Hurairah so hardly that it started to bleed. It is given in Tabaqat Ibn S’ad and in several other well-known books.

Now, question arises: should you preach stories of this kind of person! Was that story of Abu Hurairah CERTIFIED AS SAHIH by Rasool or at least by 4 Caliphs, IN PERSON?The Truth which all Truth Seekers must grasp, is:
1- No any Pooja-Pot in Islam. Pooja-Pot >> Namaz imported from Zoroastrians is NOT A GOOD DEED 2:177, 2:115, 2:142. Prostrating to Kaaba is 101% Idol Worship. No any verse of Glorious Quran ordains we Muslims to prostrate to Kaaba۔ Salat is not Namaz.

2- All stories of Sunnah, Hadiths, Contexts, Seera and Tafsir are Inauthentic because neither Rasool nor even 4 Caliphs certified any such story as SAHIH. A wise person will never build his faith on Inauthentic hearsay hocus Pocus like A heard from B, he heard from C, he heard from D, he heard from XYZ that Rasool said that Black dogs are Devil (Joke from Sahih-Muslim).

3- Mirza G A Qadiani was a False Prophet but Quran tells that Jesus did not die on the Cross 4:157 but died naturally at age over 100 >>>5:110>>Kahlan > 5:117, and dead never return. He was never raised bodily to Heaven. In 4:158, RAFA means raising in Honor and Spiritual Exaltation. Quran tells us in 20:55: Man is made from Dust, and will return to Dust (dust will not go to Sky)

4- Nowhere Quran tells that Jesus was born without Human Father. We know each word of Quran. Fact is: 66:12 tells that Mary was a Married woman أَحْصَنَتْ فَرْجَهَا and 3:36 tells: Mary used have Children.
وَإِنِّىٓ أُعِيذُهَا بِكَ وَذُرِّيَّتَهَا مِنَ ٱلشَّيْطَـٰنِ ٱلرَّجِيمِ

5- From A to Z, whole Hadiths of Two Qibla, and Buraq are forged

6- Muslim never prayed toward Jerusalem. All hadith which tell so are 101% Concocted

7- Nowhere Quran tells that God told Muslims to turn your faces from Jerusalem to Kaaba. This story has no any base at all. 2:142 forbade People from prostrating to Kaaba (as it is Idol worship). No any name of Jerusalem in 2:142

8- In whole Quran, term “Sunnah of Rasool” never appears. This term is product of Sectarian Imams. Quran tells that Job of Rasool was ONLY to deliver Quran 29:18, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20 clearly, and it was not Job of Rasool to guide people toward Right Path 2:272, 28:56, 72:21; then what Sunnah and What Hadiths. Even tons of Books of Sunni sect tell that during the life of Rasool and 4 Caliphs, there was complete ban on Sunnah Hadiths and Tafsir.

لَّيْسَ عَلَيْكَ هُدَىٰهُمْ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَهْدِى مَن يَشَآءُ

قُلْ إِنِّى لَآ أَمْلِكُ لَكُمْ ضَرًّا وَلَا رَشَدًا

To Sum Up:
After landing of Quran, Islam=Quran; FULL STOP. Any rite, Rituals/Namaz/Pooja-Pot or Sharia law which does not have roots in Quran is not part of Deen Islam. In whole Quran, term “Sunnah of Rasool” never exists nor any verse of Quran tell us to follow Sunnah of Rasool. We know each word of Quran. Meaning of “obey Allah and Rasool” is nothing else but to obey that Divine Book which Allah al-Haadi delivered to people through his Agency=Rasool, and name of that Book is Quran only. So, after landing of Quran, Deen Islam = Quran; Full Stop. In order to please Allah Jalla Aala and Prophet Mohammad on the day of judgment; there is only one way, and that way is: to follow all laws and ethical codes of Quran sincerely 25:30, 17:9, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 16:116, 50:45. So, rationally speaking; Sunnah and Hadith which Mr. Ghamidi preaches has no any base at all. In Quran, only two kinds of Sunnah are mentioned. Sunnah of Allah Kabeer-al-Mut’aal and Sunnah of bad people of past. Quran talks about Oswat-Hasana of Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Mohammad but did Prophet Mohammad or four caliphs left behind for us any extra-Quranic manuscript of Oswat-Hasana? No. They were not in need of leaving behind such manuscript because authentic Oswat-Hasana of Ibrahim and Mohammad (peace be upon both of them) is fully incorporated within Ethical Codes of Noble Quran. So, when a Muslim follows Quran, he automatically also follow Oswat-Hasana of Ibrahim and Mohammad. For example: If following verse 2:42, one does not tell lies; then that means: he also follow Oswat-Hasana of last prophet Mohammad because historically last Prophet was well known as Saadiq and Ameen. Quran also witnesses it in 68:4. This is the reason that pointing to verse 68:4 Aisha RA said that “The Quran is Akhlaaq of Messenger of God”.

We also read in 2:272, 28:56, 72:21 that Rasool=Divine Postman cannot guide anyone to right path because duty of Postman is to deliver Book; not to guide people. He is Allah who guides people, of course, through his Quran 17:9, 2:2. Now if a Man cannot guide people toward Right Path 72:21, then what is utility of Sunnah and hadith of such person?In Quran 21:47 Allah Jalla Aala has said that on the day of Judgment, each good and bad deed of person will be counted and weighed even if that deed will be like the size of a mustard seed. But so-called Hadith books of heretical Sunni sect say that by giving just one date in charity, you can invade paradise. Their another forged hadith tells that a person who recites fabricated Kalama of Sunni sect just before dying, he will be able to invade the paradise even if he has raped ten thousand women; have murdered 100 person, have committed Zina 100 times but by just giving a date in Charity or by reciting Fabricated Kalama of Sunni sect at the time of death; he will be able to invade Paradise. Another forged hadith tells: that on the day of Judgment, Prophet Mohammad will be intercessor for all big criminals. It is clear that these Munafiq Imams indeed delivered crypto message to Muslims (in order to confirm their seat in Hell), that no worries; you are free to commit all kinds of crimes in your whole wife because Prophet Mohammad will rescue you on the day of Judgement. Here you can see that almost all stories given in these forged books run counter to Quranic laws and ethical codes. This is a solid rational proof that those Pseudo Imams who fabricated hadith books were indeed hidden hypocrites of Batni Tehreek. Books of Shia sect stink even more. Noble Quran has blasted murder in over 26 verses, and Quran tells that for Qatal Mut’amad, Killer will burn in hell forever 4:93 but Zoroastrian hadith forger Bukhari encourages Sunni Mushriks to kill people because in his one so-called hadith, Bukhari tells that even after killing 100 persons, still you can invade paradise. In short, if Quran tells Muslims: go toward East; then these forged hadiths books tell Muslims: do not go toward East but go toward West. Never miss to read our this page which shows you in tabular form, how concocted hadiths run counter to Quranic laws and ethical codes.In order to learn; who is Bart D. Ehrman; reader is suggested to see Wikipedia. In short; he was a devout Christian (follower of Roman Paul), but later when he realized that the books upon which, he had built his faith, were indeed forged, therefore; he relinquished Pauline Christianity, and became an Atheist. Please note: dogma of Christianity was never founded by Islamic Prophet Isa PBUH (Jesus), but he was Roman Tentmaker Saul later called Paul who launched a new dogma which is called today Christianity. In the same way, he was not Islamic Prophet Moses but Talmudists who centuries after the death of Moses, converted name of a tribe “Judah” in to a new dogma “Judaism”. Last and Final Book of God which has superseded all previous scriptures “Quran” makes clear that near God, acceptable Deen is only Al-Islam. Deen Al-Islam = Divinely Prescribed Way of Life. Quran also makes clear that all Prophets including Moses and Jesus preached only Islam, and all Scriptures including original Torah and original Injeel were scriptures of Islam which have been superseded by final edition of all scriptures “Quran”. God has named all true followers of all Prophets “Muslims” 3:19, 3:85, 42:3, 42:13, 6:125, 39:22, 10:72, 3:67, 2:130-140, 10:84, 3:52, 22:78, 2:105-106, 5:48, 48:28. Being the final edition of all Scriptures and for being also Muhaymon 5:48; after consigning all previous scriptures to oblivion, Quran has superseded all previous Scriptures 2:105-106, 5:48, 28:52…54, 2:137, 6:155.

God guides only those people who are worthy of guidance and who are sincerely researching for Truth. God is nearer to man  than even his neck-vein and listens even what soul of person whispers 50:16. No leaf fall but He knows it 6:59. So, He knows very well about the degree of sincerity of a person toward the search of Truth. Those who are sincerely after truth, are, for sure, guided by God.

We give you here one example: there is a Jewish Professor who teaches in a University in State of Hawaii, USA. He is Professor of Comparative Religion, which means: he has studied all religions. He is not a Scholar like Bart D Ehrman who knows about only 12% of total life of Jesus; but Professor of Comparative Religion has studied all religions. So, area of Comparative Religion is much more broader than that area of a Bible Scholar who knows only about 12% life of Jesus, and he does not know about his rest of 88% life. After reading the Quran, that Jewish Professor converted to Islam. Now, he is a Muslim; you can say: Jewish Muslim, because a person is called a Jew who belongs to tribe of Judah. According to Quran, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and his twelve sons including Judah, David and Solomon all preached none except Islam.

On the Contrary, God has not guided Bart D. Ehrman because God knows well the degree of sincerity of Ehrman toward the search of Truth. We have read almost all books of Bart. After reading his all work, it clearly appears to us that he is intellectually, dishonest, and also he is not a wise man. We ask reader this question: should we criticize and mock a book even without reading and understanding that Book! Of course not, but Bart Ehrman who is a scholar about 12% life of Jesus mocks even a book which he has never read nor understood with an unbiased honest mind. We ask: Mr. Ehrman: do you understand Arabic? No. Do you understand that Arabic, in which Quran is written? No. Do you understand Arabic Grammar? No. Have you understood Quran only through Quran’s own built-in Tasreef? No. Then, what is your right to comment on Quran and mock Quran? If you have even a trace of wisdom; when YouTuber host asked you about Quran; your answer was supposed to be: I am not a Scholar of Quran, so I should not comment on Quran.

Do you think, Mr. Ehrman that the Jewish Professor of Comparative Religion which we have mentioned above, is converted to Islam even without knowing about the Author of the Quran! Fact is: when that Professor read and understood whole Quran with honest unbiased mind; he fully realized that what is written in Quran, cannot be word of any human being; no way. Bart type people are placing same blame on Quran which was being placed by Meccan Pagans 1400 years ago, who used to say: Mohammad has forged this Book. Then, God challenged Meccan Pagans in Quran 10:38, 11:13, 52:33-34, 17:88, 15:99, 41:42, that if you think that Quran is not word of God, then write even one chapter like of Quran. But Arab Pagan failed to accept challenge despite the fact, they were master in Arabic Language. Meccan Pagans were aware, that the Eight Dimensional Arabic which is used in Quran, cannot be structured by any human being; no way. Within Quran, God has said numerous times that It is He, Who has sent down the Quran, and He will protect the Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42. And in Quran, Mohmmad “in person” is not talking but God is talking to people directly or God is commanding Prophet Mohammad: Say (Qul) this and that to people. For example; even a person with half-brain can realize that in following verses; it is God Who is speaking, and following words can never be words of Mohammad (peace be upon  him).

Quran 50:16 (God says) NOW, VERILY, it is We who have created man, and We know what his innermost self whispers within him: for We are closer to him than his neck-vein (Note: “We” is majestic plural).

Quran 50:43 (God says)  Verily, it is We who grant life and deal death; and with Us will be all journeys’ end (Note: Mr. Bart: if you have even trace of sense in your brain; you must realize that these are not words of Mohammad).

Quran 4:105 We have sent down the Scripture to you [Prophet] with the truth so that you can judge between people in accordance with what God has shown you. Do not be an advocate for those who betray trust

In Quran, God has called this kind of Stubborn Ignorant people “Cattle“.

Quran 7:179 (God says) And most certainly have We destined for hell many of the invisible beings and humans who have hearts with which they fail to grasp the truth, and eyes with which they fail to see, and ears with which they fail to hear. They are like cattle -nay, they are even less conscious of the right way: it is they, they who are the [truly] heedless!

Quran 10:38 “Or do they say, ‘He (Muhammad) has forged it?’ Say, ‘Bring then a chapter like unto it, and call upon whomsoever you can, besides God, if you are truthful!

Quran 11:13 “Or do they say, ‘He (Muhammad) forged it.’ Say, ‘Bring you then ten forged chapters like unto it, and call whomsoever you can, other than God (to your help), if you speak the truth.’

Quran 52:33-34 “Or do they say, ‘He (Muhammad) has forged it?’ Nay! They believe not! Let them then produce a recital like unto it if they are truthful.”

Quran 2:23 And if you doubt any part of what We have, bestowed from on high, step by step, upon Our servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah of similar merit, and call upon any other than God to bear witness for you, if what you say is true!

Quran 17:88 “Say: ‘If all mankind and all invisible beings  would come together with a view to producing the like of this Qur’an, they could not produce its like even though they were to exert all their strength in aiding one another!

Quran 4:153 The People of the Book (Jews and Christians) demand that you [Prophet] make a book physically come down to them from heaven, but they demanded even more than that of Moses when they said, ‘Show us God face to face,’ and were struck by the thunderbolt for their presumption. Even after clear revelations had come down to them, they took the calf as an object of worship, yet We pardoned this, and gave Moses clear authority;

Quran 6:7 But even if we had sent down unto thee [O Prophet] a writing on paper, and they had touched it with their own hands – those who are bent on denying the truth would indeed have said, ‘This is clearly nothing but a deception!’

Quran 38:29 This is the Blessed Book that We have revealed to you, (O Muhammad), that people with understanding may reflect over its verses and those with understanding derive a lesson. 

Quran 39:2 It is We who sent down the Scripture to you [Prophet] with the Truth, so serve God with your total devotion.

Quran 39:41 We have sent the Scripture down to you [Prophet] with the Truth for people. Whoever follows the guidance does so for his own benefit, whoever strays away from it does so at his own peril: you are not in charge of them.

On the Contrary; after Jesus, Original Book of God “Injeel” was lost, and after the death of Prophet Harun (brother of Moses), Original Book of God “Torah” was lost. Existing NT and OT are mere collections of those books which are books of folkloric tales. In NT and OT, not even one book is Original Scripture.

Even Bart Ehrman himself has written in his own books that Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John are Anonymous Books. And the names Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John were randomly attached to these books of contradictory folkloric tales at the end of 2nd Century. Even these four Gospels are being tampered for centuries. Gospels of 4th century from Codex Sinaiticus are different from four Gospels of today.

Then, how can this man Ehrman compare those concocted and corrupted books with the Quran, in which, God repeats several times that it is He Who has sent down the Quran, and He Himself will protect it 15:9, 17:88, 41:42

Quran 15:9 (God says) We have sent down the Quran Ourself, and We Ourself will guard it.

But Ehrman asks? Who was author of Quran? God has addressed this kind of misguided people in following Quranic verses:

Quran 2:171 And so, the parable of those who re bent on denying the truth is that of the beast which hears the shepherd’s cry, and hears in it nothing but the sound of a voice and a call.  Deaf are they, and dumb, and blind: for they do not use their reason.

Quran 14:18 [This, then, is] the parable of those who are bent on denying their Sustainer: all their works  are as ashes which the wind blows about fiercely on a stormy day: [in the life to come,] they cannot achieve any benefit whatever from all [the good] that they may have wrought: for this [denial of God] is indeed the farthest one can go astray.

Quran 17:45-46 (God says) But [thus it is:] whenever thou recitest the Qur’an, We place an invisible barrier between thee and those who will not believe in the life to come: for, over their hearts We have laid veils which prevent them from grasping its purport, and into their ears, deafness. And so, whenever thou dost mention, while reciting the Qur’an, thy Sustainer as the one and only Divine Being, they turn their backs [upon thee] in aversion

Quran 23:99-100 [AS FOR THOSE who will not believe in the life to come, they go on lying to themselves] until, when death approaches any of them, he prays: “O my Sustainer! Let me return, let me return [to life], so that I might act righteously in whatever I have failed [aforetime]!’’ Nay, it is indeed but a [meaningless] word that he utters: for behind those [who leave the world] there is a barrier [of death] until the Day when all will be raised from the dead!

Quran 35:36-37 But as for those who are bent on denying the truth – the fire of hell awaits them: no end shall be put to their lives so that they could die, nor shall aught of the suffering caused by that [fire] be lightened for them: thus shall We requite all who are bereft of gratitude. And in that [hell] they will cry aloud: “O our Sustainer! Cause us to come out [of this suffering]! We shall [henceforth] do good deeds, not such as we were wont to do [aforetime]!” [But We shall answer:] “Did We not grant you a life long enough so that whoever was willing to take thought could bethink himself? And [withal,] a war­ner had come unto you! Taste, then, [the fruit of your evil deeds]: for evildoers shall have none to succour them!”

Quran 5:72-73 Indeed, the truth deny they who say, ‘Behold, God is the Christ, son of Mary’ – seeing that the Christ [himself] said, ‘O children of Israel! Worship God [alone], who is my Sustainer as well as your Sustainer.’  Behold, whoever ascribes divinity to any being beside God, unto him will God deny paradise, and his goal shall be the fire: and such evildoers will have none to succour them! Indeed, the truth deny they who say, ‘Behold, God is the third of a trinity’ – seeing that there is no deity whatever save the One God. And unless they desist from this their assertion, grievous suffering is bound to befall such of them as are bent on denying the truth

Preservation of Quran: God tells within Quran that he appointed Scribes who wrote Quranic revelations instantly when those revelations were downloaded on the heart of Prophet Mohammad, and at the same time, Quran was memorized by Prophet and his companions. God tells in Quran 54:40, that He has made Quran easy to memorize and understand. Of course Quran will not be easy for any Islamophobic hater who neither understand Arabic nor is he honest and unbiased in his research. A person who memorizes whole Quran (about 600 standard pages), is called Hafiz, and plural of Hafiz is Huffaaz. Huffaaz are a Check on Quranic Arabic text. Prophet Mohammad was first Hafiz of Quran; then his thousands companions became Hafiz, and that Memorization of Quran is continued for 1400 years without any break of even a fraction of second. It is like a River which flows 1400 km without any break. Today we have almost 50 million Huffaaz. If these all Huffaaz are gathered, and they become habitants of a new country; population of that new country will be more than Spain.

If you call a Hafiz from Moscow, 2nd from New York, 3rd from Australia, and 4th from Saudi Arabia; they all will recite same Quran which was recited by Prophet Mohammad 1400 years ago, because as we have mentioned above that in past 1400 years, memorization chain never broke even for a fraction of a second. O Man: do you not think that preservation of Quran is itself a great miracle! Fifty millions Huffaaz are a Check on Quran’s original Arabic Text. Will any Islamophobic hater change even one word of Quran; his tampering will be challenged and exposed by 50 millions Huffaaz.

If we throw all books and computer archives in Ocean; Quran will be right back. Just bring one Hafiz, and print whole Quran. Quran itself shows that Quran as Book was present during the era of Prophet Mohammad. Quran calls itself a Book several times. God also ordained in Quran “One should not touch Quran unless he is clean”. Now, a simple rational question arises, which is: can we touch a Book if that book is not present in a physical state! We suggest reader to visit this well researched page on the Compilation of Quran. Even unbiased Non-Muslim Researchers have accepted, that the Quran which we have today is same Quran which was in the hands of Mohammad 1400 years ago. Professor Dr. John Burton PhD was Professor on Islam. He was a non-Muslim. He wrote a book “The Collection of the Quran”. After in depth research, and after heavy rational argumentation; John Burton concluded in these words: That the Quran which we have today is same Quran which was with Mohmmad”

Quran 17:9 VERILY, this Qur’an shows the way to all that is most upright,  and gives the believers who do good deeds the glad tiding that theirs will be a great rewardIn above-posted video, repeating lies of the Greatest Impostor of all times “Shafi’i, He said: “After a person is satisfied on any hadith, he must follow that hadith”. Now point is: neither Rasool nor even 4 Caliphs left behind any manuscript of Sunnah and Hadiths nor they certified IN PERSON any story of Sunnah and Hadiths as Sahih. So, how can one be satisfied from this kind of Hearsay Concocted Stories? This man is talking utter nonsense.
If so called Sunnah and Hadiths were Part of Islam, then Prophet or at least 4 Caliphs were supposed to compile a Book of Sunnah and Hadith but did they? No. Sunnah and Hadiths are indeed Innovation of Sunni and Shia sects which have no any relation with Islam. It is clear in Quran that duty assigned to Rasool by God was NO MORE THAN to deliver Quran clearly 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19. This is why: He and all Sahaaba left behind only written Quran. Even in whole Quran term “Sunnah of Rasool” never appears nor any verse of Quran ordains us to follow Sunnah of Rasool. We know each word of Noble Quran

In Quran, only two kinds of Sunnah is mentioned, Sunnah of God and Sunnah of bad people of past. Rasool was ordained in 6:114, 6:119 to judge all matters only by Quran. It is told in 18:110, 10:15 that Rasool is mere a mortal man like all humans, and Rasool only follows that Quranic Wahi which he receives, and he cannot change that Wahi because he is afraid of Azaab from God 10:15

We read in 25:56, 72:21, 2:272 that Rasool cannot guide toward right path but only Allah guides, of course, through his Book. Now a Rational question arises that if Rasool could not guide you toward RIGHT PATH 72:21, 2:272, then what is your Sunnah and what is your Hadiths? No utility at all. How can you follow so called Sunnah and Hadiths of a Man who cannot guide toward right path 72:21, 28:56, 2:272? Even it is written in Six books of Sunni sect that Rasool said: I am a person like you all and can make mistake but I assure you: when I deliver you verses of Quran; I do not tell lies.

You said: God explained Deen through Messengers. This is incorrect. Truth is: God explained Deen through his Book 2:2 which Messenger delivered 2:213, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15. Role of Rasool is mere a Role of Divine Postman, and it is made very clear in several verses of Quran. Do you even believe in Quran!

Kissing your Favorite Imam Impostor Shafi’i, You also talked about world Hikma but talked wrongly. Quran tells that God gave Hikma (wisdom) to all prophets so that they could deliver Divine Message to even tyrant arrogant people in an optimal way. Hikma is not Sunnah as your favorite impostor Shia Imam Shafi’i wrote in his book Risaala (a book of blatant lies and shirk). Ibn Nadeem writes in Fehrist that Shafi’i was an ardent Shia. Ibn Hajar and author of Umdah al-Qari Badr-ud-din Aayni write in their Sharah al-Bukhari that like people of Lot, Shafi’i and his teacher Imam Malik used to do intercourse with wives through their rectum hole. So, these are your Imams whom you follow blindly. You abandon Quran 16:89, and follow Shafi’i. What is this? Is your brain on right place in your head! We also read in Sunni Book “Abu Dawud” that Prophet sent Curse on those who do intercourse with wife from rectum hole

You said: You have gotten two things from Rasool, 1- Quran , 2- Sunnah. This is incorrect. Truth is: you got Quran from God through Rasool, and Rasool was mere a Divine Postman, and this point is made very clear in 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19.

In whole Quran, term Sunnah of Rasool never appears. Sunnah is Innovation of Sunni and Shia Sects. Under command of God, Rasool delivered you only and only Quran. So, Only and Only Quran is Source of Deen. Postman cannot be source of Deen; not at all. Deen is Message (Quran); not Mortal Messenger 18:110, 72:21, 2:272, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 25:30

You said: Quran is coming to us through Ijmah and Mutawatar. This is incorrect. Truth is: whole Quran was written down in the life of Prophet, and at the same time, Quran was memorized by many. And Quran is protected by God 15:9, 17:88, 41:42. Are millions of concocted stories of Sunnah and Hadiths protected by God? Did Prophet and 4 caliphs allow to write hadiths? No.

You said: Sunnah is Rawayat of Rasool. This theory is fabricated by you and oldi Mullahs. As we have said already that Quran tells us that Rasool was mere a Divine Postman, and his only duty was to deliver Quran. It was not his duty to invent his own Hadith and Sunnah but to follow Book of his Lord 10:15, 6:19, 3:80, 6:114; and nor Rasool invented his any Sunnah and Hadiths. He followed Quran only 6:114

You said: Sunnah is content of Deen Islam. By saying so, you have committed Shirk. No any word “Sunnah of Rasool” appears in Quran nor any manuscript of Sunnah and Hadith was left behind by Rasool and 4 Caliphs. Sunnah is mere an Innovation=Bid’a

Quran has mentioned Oswat Hasana of Ibrahim and Mohammad but question is: did Ibrahim and Mohammad or 4 Caliphs leave behind for you any manuscript of Oswat Hasana? No. They did not leave behind such manuscript because Authentic Oswat-Hasana of both Prophets is incorporated within ethical codes of Quran. This is why: Aisha RA also said: The Quran is Akhlaaq of Rasool

القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

So, meaning of “Obey Allah and Rasool” is nothing else but to follow that Divine Book which God delivered to us through his Agency=Rasool, and name of that Book is not Sunnah and Hadith but Quran only 5:44-48, 12:106, 42:10, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 39:13, 50:45, 16:116, 10:59-60, 7:32, 7:2-3, 11:18, 66:1, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 3:80, 18:110, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20, 2:213, 16:64, 24:54, 36:17, 13:40, 16:35, 16:82, 64:12, 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 25:30, 25:33, 29:51, 45:6, 46:9, 28:85, 42:15, 2:159, 7:157, 47:2

Like all Jaahil Sectarian Mullahs, He too quoted verse 4:65 of Quran “ḥatta yuḥakkimuka fīma shajara baynahum” in order to support his fake Sunnah and fabricated hadiths. Quran was written down instantly after revelations were received. Reader is suggested to read our page: Compilation of Quran under supervision of Prophet. If Hadith and Sunnah were Part of Islam, Prophet was supposed to set up another panel, and to order them to write another two books, book of Hadith and book of Sunnah in addition to Quran. But did he? No. In fact once Prophet Mohammad found some people writing his non-Quranic Speech and rebuked them and said: Are you compiling another Book beside Book of Allah; this is not right. Then he ordered them to erase all what they have written down and told them: Do not write from me any thing accept Quran.

After death of Prophet, Abu Bakar forbade Muslims to use hadiths “La Tuhadithu” and Caliph Umar collected all scattered hadiths from People and burned those all in front of public and he banned all Hadiths. Reader is suggested to read our page “True history of Hadiths“. Besides; God says in Quran 72:21 and 28:56, 2:272 that Rasool cannot guide any one to RIGHT Path. Then, how could he invent his hadith and sunnah in order to guide Muslims? Truth is: Only Quran is authentic Hadith of Allah 39:23 and his Messenger 69:40. All extra-Quranic man-made books attached to Islam are inspired by Satan 6:112. Prophet Mohammad returned to his Lord in 632 CE. “Up to year 722/738 CE, Hadith and Sunnah used to have no any legality in Islam” (Professor J. Schacht; and Imam Al-Ghazali in Ihya-al-Aloom). He was Criminal Pseudo Imam Shafi’i (Paul of Islam) who supported Satanic innovations of Hadith and Sunnah, and placed majority of Muslims on the path of Satan 1200 years ago. Obeying Allah and his Messenger means nothing else but to follow only Quran 6:114, 10:15, 25:30, 6:19, 7:3. All what is given in standalone self-explanatory Quran is part of Islam, and any rite, ritual or Islamic Law (Sharia) that does not have roots in Quran is absolutely not part of Islam. Quran has its own built-in dictionary and its own built-in exegesis (Tafsir) 25:33 through its own Tasreef, therefore; Quran is absolutely not in need of any external theological support such as millions of fabricated hadiths and forged Sunnah, Gossipy Tafsirs, fake Contexts stories, Fiqh, and Seera.

When we read verse 4:65 in the light of these verses 5:44-48, 12:106, 42:10, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 39:13, 50:45, 16:116, 10:59-60, 7:32, 7:2-3, 11:18, 66:1, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 3:80, 18:110, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20, 2:213, 16:64, 24:54, 36:17, 13:40, 16:35, 16:82, 64:12, 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 25:30, 25:33, 29:51, 45:6, 46:9, 28:85, 42:15, 2:159, 7:157, 47:2; it becomes clear that Rasool was bound to judge according to laws of Quran; not from his own so called Sunnah and Hadiths which he and four caliphs never left behind as manuscript.

Then, Ghamidi tried to validate man-made Tafsir, and according to him: Tafsir is necessary in order to finish Ikhtalaaf/difference among Muslims. But fact is: that Ikhtalaaf came into existence due to millions of Fabricated Hadiths and fake Stories of Contexts and Sunnah; otherwise: Quran is very clear on all matters, and Quran fully explains itself through its own built-in Tasreef. Prophet and all Sahaaba were aware of this truth, and this is the reason: that they did not leave behind any manuscript of Hadiths, Sunnah and Tafsir.

One Forged Hadiths says: It is forbidden to discharge urine while standing. Other Forged hadith say: Prophet was found urinating on a pile of garbage in standing position. One forged hadiths says: if you find a snake in your home, kill it. Other concocted hadith says: do not kill it. Leave it alone. One forged hadith say: Prophet forbade to urinate facing Kaaba. Other forged hadith say: Prophet was found urinating when he was facing Kaaba. We can post over 500 examples here for this kind of forged contradictory hadiths. So, now it is clear: what is the cause of Ikhtalaaf. Books of forged Hadiths and fake Sunnah are the root-cause of all sects and Ikhtalaaf. Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah was written before Bukhari. That book shows that Caliph Umar RA castigated one man who tried to write Tafsir. Same Book also shows when a person asked Tafsir of one verse from Caliphs Ali and Abu Bakar: they responded “which earth will give me refuge and which Sky will shadow over me if I tell you about Quran something which I do not know”. Whenever a person asked Rasool about any verse; Rasool always referred that person to other verses of Quran because Quranic verses explain each other in multifaceted forms; and Quran is not in need of millions of fabricated Hadiths, stories of fake Sunnah and stories of gossipy Tafsirs.

Ikhtalaaf is due to these fabricated Hadiths, stories of fake Sunnah and stories of gossipy Tafsirs. For example: from 1200 years, Sunni and Shia Mullah and Imams are disputing word RAFA of 4:158? Why? Reason is: instead of understanding RAFA from within Quran, they follow fabricated Hadiths, stories of fake Sunnah and stories of gossipy Tafsirs. When we list all verses of Quran in which word RAFA is used; it becomes clear that in Quran, meaning of Rafa is to raise in Ranks/Honor or Spiritual Exaltation. It never means to raise dead or alive body of Jesus to any remote part of Sky. By following fabricated hadiths; Mullahs have been translating word Baghiya of 19:20, 19:28 as Prostitute, whore slut but when we understand this word through Quran’s own Tasreef; word Baghiya has root in word Bagha, Baaghi which means: who rebels against law; not prostitute. We read in Ihya al-Aloom of Imam al-Ghazali that Sahaaba used to hate to write hadiths and it was year 738 CE when concoction of Sunnah and hadiths started. Same is said by Professor of Islamic law of Columbia University Professor Schacht. He writes that before year 722 CE; all Muslims Jurists used to make law only from Quran, and Sunnah and Hadiths used to have no any legal status, and Jurists used to say that any law made from extra-Quranic sources is erroneous. Book of Imam Al-Ghazali and several others books have recorded that Rasool said: Who will do Tafsir of Quran with his own Opinion; his seat in Hell is confirmed. Rasool said so because Rasool was aware that Quran is self-explanatory through its own Tasreef. This is why: Rasool and all Sahaaba left behind only written Quran; no hadith; no sunnah tales or Tafsir stories.

Then Mr. Ghamidi said: that who does not follow Fake Fabricated Sunnah, he denied Mohammad. What is this? O Man: this is Shirk Kabeer! Quran is big or your Impostor Shia Imam Shafi’i? Nowhere Quran tells to follow Sunnah of Rasool nor even term “Sunnah of Rasool” appears in Quran. You are making this tale from your own brain. Fact is: denying Quran is denying both, God and his Rasool. Neither Rasool nor even 4 Caliphs left behind any manuscript of Hadiths and Sunnah. Who told that Zoroastrian hypocrite Bukhari to forge his book 250 years after the death of Prophet, and his Book contains tons of blasphemous stories which insult great man 68:4 Mohammad (peace be upon him) and attack Quran again and again. These Pseudo hadith Imams were indeed hypocrites of Batni Tehreek.

Then, Mr. Ghamidi misused word Yusallemu Tasleema. Fact is: these words tell to obey living Rasool when he used to judge according laws of Quran only 6:114. In over 120 well-known books, it is mentioned that Rasool said: after me follow Quran. In those 120 books, no any words of Sunnah or Ahle-bait are mentioned but Shia and Sunni sects succeeded to forge some hadiths in which they blended word Sunnah or Ahle-bait besides the Quran, and such forged hadiths contradict Quran 6:114.

We never criticize any one but only in a rational and logical way but this man: escapes from the backdoor by saying that people use my video-talks out of context. It is like those corrupt Politicians who are when held by law-enforcing agencies due to their bad illegal speech; they always say: my speech is taken out of context – out of Si’aqo Sabaaq

To Sum Up:
Rationally, what Ghamidi has said in this video has no any base at all. In above-mentioned video, he has indeed committed Shirk again and again. Implicitly, he has tried to equate mortal man 18:110, 3:80 Mohammad to God who is Omnipresent and ever living, and will never die.

Responding to one person “Taimur”. Excuse us for saying this but the whole story which you have told in this video is almost incorrect. Reason of that mistake is: it seems, you failed to understand the meaning of Quranic word Ibadat. Almost all Sunni and Shia, and Pseudo Scholars like Ghamidi and Mirza Engr translate word Ibadat as WORSHIP. Because like millions of Sectarians, they are also Jaahil. They follow Oldi Ignorant Imams blindly, and they do not use their own reason independently. Learn that word “worship” is in general relevant to Idol worship. In worship, Idol is usually in front of Idol-Worshiper. But Proto Root of word Ibadat is ABD. For example ABD-Allah=Servant of God. ABD has another connotation “Abeed=Slave”. Now, point is: does a servant worship his Master or he obeys orders of his Master? Does a servant physically prostrate to his Master by placing forehead on ground or he obeys orders of his master?

For word Ibadat; Simple answer is: a Servant obeys orders of his Master/Lord/God. And those all orders of Master have been finalized in Noble Quran. When you obey all laws and ethical codes of Quran, you are “serving your Master=Doing Ibadat” of your Master. For example: Quran tells in 2:42, do not tell lies. So, when you follow 2:42, you are obeying order of your Master, and that is Ibadat. When, by following verse 24:2, you do not commit Zina; you are serving order of your Master, and that means: You are doing Ibadat>>proving that indeed you are an ABD =S ervant >> ABD > ABEED > IBADAT

Quran makes very clear in these verses 50:16, 57:3, 57:4, 58:7, 2:115, 2:142, 2:177, 2:186, 24:35, 67:13, 20:7, 13:9-10, 56:83-84-85, 4:108, 6:59, 2:255, 6:103, 34:50, 11:61, 5:109, 7:7, 4:126, 10:61 that God is Omnipresent, and so God is not any kind of Idol nor God is confined to Kaaba or Jerusalem or Vatican or any temple. All directions belong to God. “Whichever direction you turn, there is presence of God 2:115. God is with you wherever you may be 57:4. God is closer to man even than his neck-vein 50:16.

In Surah 109 “The Disbelievers” Prophet is ordained by God to tell Unbelievers, your way of life=Deen is different from our way of life=Deen al-Islam 3:19, 3:85. So your Deen=way of life is for you and our way of life (Deen al-Islam) is for us. I do do Ibadat by serving my Master (God), and I do not serve your Masters (Idols).

Al-Islam is Deen (Divinely Prescribed way of life). But Deen of Unbelievers is different because their way of life is not Divinely prescribed. In Deen/Quran, core Message is Peace 60:8-9, 2:190 Justice 4:135 and Philanthropy 2:177. In Mullah-Made Religion=Madhab=Theocracy, core is based on Non-Quranic Rituals like five Zoroastrian Namaz which were imported from Zoroastrians, and then those were validated through Fabricated Hadith of Flying Horse Buraq. Core of Religion are Dam-Droods, Na’ats, Taweez Gandaaz and many other Mullah-made rites and rituals which are not ordained by Noble Quran.

Salat is NOT any kind of Namaz Rituals. Quran has called Namaz Rituals USELESS in verse 2:177. Quran tells in 2:177, these praying-ritual facing Kaaba are not a GOOD DEED but good deed is to be a Muslim 4:136, follow Divine law 6:114, and live as a Righteous Philanthropist 2:177 = Extending services to your parents, family, relatives and whole humanity.

In verse 24:41, Quran tells: even birds follow Salat. If Salat is Namaz; then do birds pray Namaz like Sunni or Shia? Do birds shout in Loudspeaker a Non-Quranic Sunni Azan or Shia Azan? Do birds recite Fatiha in Qayaam? Do birds sit in Atta-Hiyaat and recite Shia-Made Durood Ibrahimi and text of Atta-Hiyaat? No. Birds follow their mission and strife as they are bidden to follow by their Lord.

In Five Zoroastrian Namaz, Sunni and Shia place forehead on ground (like Idol worshipers) toward Kaaba. But not even one verse of Quran tells us to prostrate to Kaaba which is made of stones and cement. We know each word of Quran. No any verse of Quran tells that prostration toward Kaaba is part of Salat. Function of Kaaba is given in 5:95, 5:97 and that function has to do nothing with Five Parsi Namaz Rituals.

In Namaz, Sunni and Shia place forehead toward Kaaba. They call it Sajadah. Now point is: if in Quran, meaning of Sajadah is to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba; then how Elephants, Lions, Tigers, Deer, Cow, Sun, Moon and Mountains do Sajadah because Quranic verses 55:6, 22:18 tell us that even Mountains, Sun, Moon, and Stars do Sajdah. Have you ever seen Mountain Himalaya entering in any Masjid, and placing forehead on the ground toward Kaaba?

Meaning of Proto Root of word “Sajadah” is “Humble to”, and same meaning are used in Glorious Quran. Mountains, Stars, Sun, and Moon humble to Divine Laws. When as a True Muslim, you follow all laws and ethical codes of Quran, you are in the state of Sajadah and Ibadat which are components of Quranic Salat

Brother Taimur: Quran is pretty big Book. God says: his Quran is fully detailed (mufassal) 6:114. God says: for Deen Islam, his Quran explains every thing 16:89. But Quran even never mentions number of Rakat of Five Namaz, because Namaz is not Salat.

Now, if these arguments are read by Sunni and Shia sects; they escape from the backdoor by saying that they have learned methods of Namaz from Rasool. But Truth is: Rasool and 4 Caliphs left behind only written Quran. They did not leave behind even one page of so called Hadiths, Sunnah, Seera. Asbab-Nazool, Fiqh and Tafsir. This kind of all material is forged by Sectarians in order to validate their five Parsi Namaz and to validate tons of Non-Quranic Sharia laws. Even we read tons of reports in Books of Sunni Sect that during the era of Rasool and 4 caliphs, there was complete ban on the writing of Hadith Sunnah and Tafsir. You can read tons of references in this page.

Truth is: Because Rasool and even 4 Caliphs left behind only written Quran, therefore; any rite, ritual or Sharia law which does not have roots in Quran, is not part of Deen al-Islam. After landing of Quran, Islam=Quran; Full Stop. Meaning of “Obey Allah and Rasool” is to obey laws of that Divine Book which Allah Azza wa Jal delivered to we people through his Rasool, and name of that Book is Quran only 6:19, 10:15, 6:114, 17:9, 28:85, 50:45, 25:30. Several verses of Quran make clear that Duty assigned to Rasool by God was NO MORE THAN to deliver Quran clearly, therefore; Rasool was mere an Agency of God 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19. So:

Authentic Hadith of Allah 39:23 = Authentic Hadith of Rasool 69:40, 81:19 = Only Quran 6:114, 6:19

Verse 3:103 forbids Tafarraqa in one Ummah. That means: no any Division, Split, Grouping, and Sect is permitted by Quran. Quran tells in 22:78, God has named you MUSLIMS; not Sunni and Shia Wahabi Salafi Ahle-Hadith Brailvi, DeoBandi JinnBandi PariBandi NasBandi Hanafi Maliki Shafi’i and Hanbali. This kind of all groups have split one Ummah. Quran tells in 6:159 that these Sect followers are OUT from the Fold of Islam. Verse 3:105 tells: Hell is waiting for these Sect Followers.

In whole Quran, Quran has never called Islam “Mazhab/Madhab=Theocracy. Quran is not Book of Religion=Theocracy=Pooja-Pot=Ritualism=Madhab but Quran is book of Divine Sociology. It guides us: how to spend our life on this planet, and get rewarded hereafter 17:9.How was hoax of Ascension and Return of Jesus infused among Muslims?

When we read Copies of 4 Canonical Gospels from Codex Sinaiticus of 4th Century; we do not find any hoax of Ascension and Return of Jesus. Church blended this hoax in last 12 verses of Gospel of Mark and in Luke 24:51 much later in order to impress new converts that Christianity is a Supernatural Dogma.

When Christians converted to Islam in 7th Century; new converts also spread hoax of Ascension and Return of Jesus among Muslims. They also spread their fake Story of Substitution that Jesus was replaced on Cross by some one. Now that story later was blended in fabricated Hadith Books of Sunni and Shia sects. Now; in order to Reconcile stories of Fabricated Hadiths with Quran; Ghamidi type Mullahs started to tamper translation of several verses of Quran especially those verses which are relevant to Jesus.

Quranic verse 4:157 NEVER DENIES nailing of Jesus on the Cross but this verse denies Crucifixion of Jesus which means: Jesus did not die on the Cross = Not Crucified. because according to all definitions of Crucifixion; Death on the Cross is a Binding Condition of the punishment which is called Crucifixion.

Tons of historical, Biblical and Archaeological evidence shows that Jesus was INDEED nailed on the Cross but he survived death, and later secretly immigrated to East. Lived 120 years and died and is buried in grave of Rozabal.

This all historical, Biblical and Archaeological evidence has nothing to do with False Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani.

Oldest Copy of Mark also show, after incident of Cross, Jesus went to East and told his disciples to preach West. Restored Gospel of Nazarene also show that Jesus survived death on the Cross and secretly immigrated to East Zone of Parthian Empire (which are lands of Afghanistan, Pakistan Kashmir).

Historian Tabari of 10th Century also writes that Jesus and his mother became Immigrants as they left Palestine and wandered from Country to County to have refuge. Verse 23:50 of Quran tells us: Jesus and his mother became Refugee and God provided them with Shelter on Hilly Places where were fountains and gardens>> Murree, Srinagar.

It is written in over 30 well known ancient Books of Sunni sect that Prophet Mohammad said. Jesus died at age 120. And we all know that Prophet Mohammad was not follower of False Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani.

Jesus said in Matthew 15:24 I have been sent to lost sheep (Lost Tribes) of Israel.

AND INDEED, people of Afghanistan, KPK Pakistan and Kashmir are from lost tribes of Israel. 2500 years ago, they were taken into captivity by Babylonian Emperor Bakht Nasr (Nebuchadnezzar), and later, he deported them to the lands which are called today Kashmir, KPK Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Biggest Irrefutable Proof of that is: that even after 2500 years of their deportation from Palestine; even today, you can find Tribe Names of People of Kashmir and Afghanistan in OLD TESTAMENT. Can be there any bigger proof than this?

Our team specializes on the life of Jesus. We have done Research on this subject for over 40 years. You are suggested to read our several pages on the life of Jesus.

Pristine Islam existed only up to year 722 CE. Then during Abbasid Period, Islam was hijacked by Sunni and Shia Mullahs (Like Paul hijacked True Path of Jesus). Almost all Ministers including Prime Minister of Abbasid Caliph Harun Rashid were Zoroastrians from Bramka Family. Harun Rashid was caliph only by name. All control of state was in the hands of Bramka. Even Tutor of Harun Rashid was from Bramka. Slave-Girl>>Mother of Harun Rashid >> Queen al-Khaizrun was ally of Bramka.

Bramka planned to blend Five Zoroastrian Namaz Rituals in Islam. They managed to forge Hadith of Flying Horse Buraq. They copied story of Buraq from two Zoroastrian Books Arda Viraf and Zerdashnama. They also tried to change text of Quran but they failed because Quran is protected by God 15:9, 17:88, 41:42 through Huffaaz. Salat is not Five Rituals.
Then during that era, they were Zoroastrians who told Arabs how to understand Quran. They also invented dictionary of Quranic terms and translated as they wished. Since that time; almost all Arabs are understanding the Quran after wearing the glasses of Zoroastrians. Today; in Quranic Aloom, Arabs are as ignorant as are non-Arabs because both parties follow guideline of Zoroastrians which they produced during era of Abbasid Caliphs.

Arabic language used in 5:116-117 are in past tense, and neither you nor that south Asian Punjabi and Urdu Speaking Moulvi Ghamidi knows Arabic grammar better than us.

According Quran 3:144, Jesus is already died.

Active Past قَالَ qaala
anaqultu >> past
قَالَ – past tense
مَا يَكُونُ – past tense
إِن كُنتُ >> past tense

Following is the Translation of Internationally reputed Scholar of Quran Dr. Mohammad Asad PhD who lived in Saudi Arabia among Bedouins in order to learn Original Dialect of Quranic Arabic.

5:116 (All bold are in past tense)
AND LO! God said: O Jesus, son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, `Worship me and my mother as deities beside God’?’ [Jesus] answered: ‘Limitless art Thou in Thy glory! It would not have been possible for me to say what I had no right to [say]! Had I said this, Thou wouldst indeed have known it! Thou knowest all that is within myself, whereas I know not what is in Thy Self. Verily, it is Thou alone who fully knowest all the things that are beyond the reach of a created being’s perception. (Asad)

مَا قُلْتُ – past tense
وَكُنتُ – past tense
past tense >>> مَّا دُمْتُ فِيهِمْم
As long as I dwelt in their midst
past tense >> وَكُنتُ عَلَيْهِمْ شَهِيدًا

5:117 Nothing did I tell them beyond what Thou didst bid me [to say]: `Worship God, [who is] my Sustainer as well as your Sustainer.’ And I bore witness to what they did as long as I dwelt in their midst; but since Thou hast caused me to die, Thou alone hast been their keeper: for Thou art witness unto everything. (Asad)

Jesus already dead 2000 years ago as per 3:144

وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ مِن قَبْلِهِ ٱلرُّسُلُ أَفَإِي۟ن مَّاتَ أَوْ قُتِلَ ٱنقَلَبْتُمْ عَلَىٰٓ أَعْقَـٰبِكُمْ وَمَن يَنقَلِبْ عَلَىٰ عَقِبَيْهِ فَلَن يَضُرَّ ٱللَّهَ شَيْـًٔا وَسَيَجْزِى ٱللَّهُ ٱلشَّـٰكِرِينَ

AND MUHAMMAD is only an apostle (Rasool); all the [other] apostles (Rusul) have passed away before him: if, then, he dies or is slain, will you turn about on your heels? But he that turns about on his heels can in no wise harm God – whereas God will requite all who are grateful [to Him]. (Asad)

Word قَدْ خَلَتْ is used in this verse . Same word is used in several other verses of Quran too and meaning of that word is THOSE WHO PASSED AWAY=DIED

In this verse word RUSUL is used which is Plural of Rasool. That means: Before Mohammad; all Rasool have been passed away=Died, and Jesus was also Rasool 5:75; so Jesus is also passed away=Died. Dead people do not return.

مَّا ٱلْمَسِيحُ ٱبْنُ مَرْيَمَ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ مِن قَبْلِهِ ٱلرُّسُلُ وَأُمُّهُۥ صِدِّيقَةٌ كَانَا يَأْكُلَانِ ٱلطَّعَامَ ٱنظُرْ كَيْفَ نُبَيِّنُ لَهُمُ ٱلْـَٔايَـٰتِ ثُمَّ ٱنظُرْ أَنَّىٰ يُؤْفَكُونَ

5:75 The Christ, son of Mary, was but a Messenger (Rasool): all [other] Messengers had passed away before him; and his mother was one who never deviated from the truth; and they both ate food [like other mortals]. Behold how clear We make these messages unto them: and then behold how perverted are their minds!

In this verse 5:75 same words قَدْ خَلَتْ are used which are used in 3:144

Do not follow Ghamidi Blindly. He also tells many things which are 101% Incorrect. Like all other Sectarian Mullahs, he too, tamper translation of several verses of Quran deliberately in order to support his some unsound beliefs which he picked from his two Urdu/Punajbi Speaking South Asian Teachers Amin Islahi and Farahi.

Ghamidi also spread a big joke that after death of Jesus; angels came and lifted Jesus’s dead body to heavens. This is pure Childish Tale which shows: Ghamidi does not have even basic understanding of Quran, Spirituality and metaphysics. This man is not a scholar at all. He does not understand even very fundamentals.

Regardless if any Mullah is from Pakistan or from Saudi Arabia or from Qatar or from Turkey; they all twist and tamper translation of Quran in order to reconcile Quranic verses with their some fabricated hadiths. This is why; from over 100 translations of Quran; not a single one is without twists and tampering.1– Prophet Mohammad PBUH was the last Prophet, and Mirza G A Qadiani was a false Prophet.

2– Isa/Jesus did not die on the Cross but died over 90 years age 5:110>Kahlan naturally
5:117, and dead never return. In 4:158, Rafa is spiritual exaltation

3– Quran is big Book and is Mufassal 6:114 and complete 16:89 but no any Mehdi and Dajjal in Quran.

4– Mehdi is a fable of Persian Zoroastrians which later infused in CONCOCTED Hadith Books of Sunni and Shia sects

5– Dajjal (anti-Christ) is a fable of Church which later infused in CONCOCTED Hadith Books of Sunni and Shia sects

6– Nowhere Quran says: Jesus was born without human father. Jesus was biological son of Mary and Joseph. Read our page on the birth of Jesus in the light of Bible, Quran and history

7– Prophet, 4 Caliphs, and all Sahaaba left behind no any manuscript of Hadith Sunnah seera Contexts and Tafsir. This kind of all books are Fabrications

8– After landing of Quran, Islam=Quran; FULL STOP. Any rite or ritual or Islamic law which does not have roots in Quran is NOT part of Deen Islam.

9– Because Rasool left behind only Quran, therefore; meaning of “Obey Allah and Rasool” is nothing else but to follow only Quran 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 25:30, 16:116, 50:45, 17:9, 28:85

10– According to Quran 6:159, 3:105, 22:78, sect followers are Out from the fold of Islam 6:159, 3:103, 3:105, 42:13

11 – Quranic salat has no relation with those 5 Namaz which were imported from Persian Zoroastrians. Read our page on Salat.

12– Abrogation is the greatest lie again Quran. In fact, Quran abrogates outdated Sharia of previous Books in 2:105-106, 5:48, and supersedes those old books.

13– All those rites of Hajj which are not given in Quran, are not part of Islamic Hajj.

14– Stories of two-Qibla, Qibla Change, and Flying Horse Buraq are 101% fabricated stories which were a product of political dispute between Omayyad Caliphs of Sham, and Ruler of Mecca Abd-Allah bin Zubair. During life of Prophet, Muslims neither prayed Namaz facing Kaaba nor Jerusalem. Namaz is not a good deed 2:177, 2:115. Five Namaz were imported from Zoroastrians during era of Abbasid Caliph Harun Rashid.

15– In Quran, meaning of Sajadah is not to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba but in Quran, meaning of Sajadah is “humble to Divine law” 22:18, 55:6
Islam is that sole one true path of God which was preached by all Prophets including Moses and Jesus. Judaism is made by Talmudists, and founder of Christianity is Roman Paul.

16– Islam is not a Religion=Madhab=Mazhab=Theocracy but Islam is Deen (Divinely Prescribed Way of Life). Quran is not a book of Madahab=Theocracy but Book of Divine Sociology. This is why: core message of Quran is Peace, Justice and Philanthropy 60:8-9, 4:135, 2:190, 2:177 but core of Mullahs’ Religion is Mullah-made Rituals, Rituals, disputes, Fasaad, Fatwa-mongering, Rituals, shirkia n’ats, many Dam-Droods and Taweez Gnadaaz.

17– Complete Quran was written down and compiled as Book during the life of Prophet. Four Caliphs just reprinted copy of Prophet. Read this very Important page “Compilation of Noble Quran”

18– There was ban on writings of Hadiths, Sunnah and Tafsir during the life of Prophet and 4 Caliphs. Read tons of proof here. So all books of Sunnah, Hadiths, Contexts, Seera and Tafsir are fabricated, and those fabrications have to do nothing with that Deen Islam which has been finalized in Quran.

19– In Quran, regardless if a Zani is married or unmarried; punishment for Zina (intercourse without wedlock) is 100 lashes 24:2. Quran does not have any punishment of Rajam (stoning) for a Zani. They were some hypocrites from people of Book (like Talmudist K’ab -al-Ahbar) who blended stoning punishment of Talmud in hadith books. Read this page on Rajam 

20– Fifty-two years old Prophet never married Aisha RA at age six or nine. All the 13 narrators of this kind of fake hadiths are Shia of Iraqi cities Basra and Kufa. People who have read history of Islam know well that Shia abuse Abu Bakar RA and Aisha RA. See names of those 13 Shia narrators in this page.

21– Deen al-Islam is simple and straight, and that is: to follow all laws and ethical codes of Quran sincerely. That’s it 17:9, 28:85. Any rite, ritual, or Islamic law (Sharia law) which does not have roots in Quran is absolutely not part of Deen Islam. 

22– Islam is Message; not Messenger 5:44-48, 12:106, 42:10, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 39:13, 50:45, 16:116, 10:59-60, 7:32, 7:2-3, 11:18, 66:1, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 3:80, 18:110, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20, 2:213, 16:64, 24:54, 36:17, 13:40, 16:35, 16:82, 64:12, 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 25:30, 25:33, 29:51, 45:6, 46:9, 28:85, 42:15, 2:159, 7:157, 47:2. Final Divine law has been finalized in Quran. Therefore; after landing of Quran, Source of Islam is ONLY AND Quran ONLY. Those Jaahil Pseudo Scholars who say that Source of Islam is Mortal man Mohammad 18:110 and Fabricated Sunnah; they are La’een Mushriks; they will live as Mushriks, they will die as Mushriks, and they will be raised as Mushriks. Messenger was mere an Agency of Allah Azza wa Jal and his job was no more than to deliver Quran clearly to people, and this point has been made very clear in verses 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19. Because Rasool was mere Agency of Allah Jalal Aala, therefore: it is clear that:

Authentic Hadith of Allah 39:23 = Authentic Hadith of Rasool 69:40, 81:19 = Quran only 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 25:30, 50:45Commenting under video of Mr. Ghamidi “Islamic–Jewish relations | یہودیوں کے ساتھ تعلقات | Javed Ahmed Ghamidi – M.Hassan Ilyas”

*Some mistakes which Mr. Ghamidi made in this video.*
1– Mr. Ghamidi said “Istasna is original Torah”. We guess, by Istasna he meant” Mishnah” which is part of Talmud (not of Torah). Talmud is product of Rabbis. Besides; it seems: Mr. Ghamidi’s knowledge in History and Comparative religion is very limited. Fact is: Original Torah was lost after the death of Prophet Harun (elder brother of Moses). Torah which they have now was concocted by Rabbi Ezra centuries after the death of Moses, and some parts were concocted during Yahood’s captivity under Babylonian Emperor Bakht Nasr (Nebuchadnezzar). Even Big brains of Yahood like Spinoza admitted that Torah of today is not Torah of Moses. They have now different mutually conflicting versions.

Jurist and Judge of 11th Century Ibn Hazm was also scholar of Comparative Religion. After having several debates with Rabbis he wrote that though we Muslims believe that Original Torah was Book of God but Original Torah has been lost. He, rationally step by step propounded his argument in his following Book (in Arabic) which Mr. Ghamidi and Mr. Ilyas are suggested to read and also understands *”Al-Fisal fi al-Milal wa al-Nihal”* by Ibn Hazm. When Quran refers Torah and Injeel positively, that reference of Quran is for Original Torah and Original Injeel. Quran also tells that People of Book have corrupted Scriptures.

2– When Quran says: God will keep followers of Jesus above others; then question is: who are his real followers? According to Quran, all Prophets were prophets of Deen Islam, so Jesus too was prophet of Islam. Therefore; real inheritors of all Prophets including Jesus are Muslims 22:78, 3:52, 3:19, 3:85, 42:13, 3:67, 2:130-150. We think, Mr. Ghamidi has also a limited approach in Christians’ history and in their Gospels and other books of New Testament. Fact is: Original Injeel in Aramaic language does not exist today. All the books of New Testament are man-made which are based on folkloric hearsay tales. Even if some tales might be true; we cannot judge those if really those are true or not. No any book of New Testament is Scripture. Even Top Bible Scholars have written that Four Gospels of Christians are Anonymous Books. So far, no one knows who are authors of these 4 Gospels. Names Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John were randomly attached to these anonymous books at the end of 2nd Century. Also these four Gospels are being corrupted from past 1800 years. For example: when we read last page of Gospel of Mark and we read Luke 24:51 of today, we find there story of Ascension and Return of Jesus but when we read ancient copy of Mark and Luke of 4th Century from Codex Sinaiticus, we *do not find* that story of Ascension and Return of Jesus. So, it is clear that story of Ascension and Return of Jesus was blended by Church much later in Gospel of Mark and Luke 24:51.

Historically, True followers of Jesus “Essene=HawaariYoon 3:52” used to call themselves MUSLIMS 22:78; not Christians. They used to call Paul an Apostate=Murtadd, and later that Apostate became founder of new Dogma which is called Christianity (Ibrahim was neither a follower of Judaism nor was he a Christian but he was a Upright Muslim 3:67, 22:78). So founder of Christian Dogma is NOT Islamic Prophet Isa/Jesus but is Roman Paul. In the same way: Founder of Dogma “Judaism” is NOT Islamic Prophet Moses but those Rabbis who centuries after the death of Moses, converted name of a tribe “Judah=Yahooda into a new dogma “Judaism”. *Moses and Jesus preached Deen al-Islam 3:19, 3:85, 42:13; not Judaism and Christianity.*

3– We agree with Mr. Ghamidi in this point that in past, when Yahood violated law of Lord, they were punished but even at that time in the same town, those Yahood were not punishmed who followed law of Lord. Punishment for Sabbath Violation is one example: Quran tells us: In that town, God punishmed only those sinners who broke law of Sabbath but people who did not break the law were not punishmed. Allah Jalla Aala is the Best Judge (al-Adal) and He is al-Lateef and al-Khabeer. His Greatness is The Greatest. In following Quranic verse 7:165, God is verbatim

*Quran 7:165* And thereupon, when those [sinners-Sabbath Breakers] had forgotten all that they had been told to take to heart, *We saved those who had tried to prevent the doing of evil,* and overwhelmed those who had been bent on evildoing *with dreadful suffering* for all their iniquity; (Asad)

People forget that Prophet Isa were also a Jew and that Jewish Prophet was Prophet of Islam. Also, meaning of Jew is that person who belongs to tribe of Judah. So a Jew can be a Buddhist or Christian or Muslim. In US state of Hawaii one Jewish Professor of Comparative Religion became Muslim (you can see him at YouTube). Now, he is Muslim but still he is also a Jew because he belongs to tribe of Judah=Yahood>>One son of Prophet Jacob/Yaqub. On the other side, Islamic Prophets Moses and Harun were not Jews because they were not from the Tribe of Judah but Islamic Prophets David and Solomon were Jews because they belonged to tribe of Judah.

In this era, contribution of Yahood to science and Technology is great and we must appreciate it. Einstein was also a Jew, and all Muslims Scientist follow his work happily.

Prophet Jacob had 12 sons Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Issachar, Asher, Zebulan, Joseph, And Benjamin. On the name of each son was a tribe; so 12 tribes. When Babylonian Emperor Bakht Nasr (Nebuchadnezzar) attacked around 5863 BC, from 12 tribes he took 10 in captivity. Only two tribes were left in Palestine and Judah. Later, from the captivity of Bakht Nasr, most of those 10 lost tribes were forced to immigrate toward East. Finally they reached in that land which is called today Afghanistan, KPK (Pak) and Kashmir.  People of Afghanistan, KPK and Kashmir are lost tribes of Israel. They are not Jews (from tribe of Judah) but are from Bani-Israel, and they are Cousins of Jews. The biggest irrefutable proof of this claim is: that even after 2500 years of their deportation from Palestine, even today tribe-names Afghanis and Kashmiris can be found in Old Testament. Tribes names run same over centuries 49:13. We also read in Gospel of Mathew that “Jesus said: I have sent only for the lost sheep (lost tribes) of Israel.”This means: Jesus was supposed to go to Kashmir to preach them but did Jesus fulfill what he said in above-given verse of Matthew? Yes. He did. After failed Crucifixion, Jesus took in confidence the top leadership of Essene and told them that he with his mother Mary is going to move permanently to Kashmir. For security reasons, Jesus travelled under Pseudo name “Yuz Asaph” to Damascus, then to Nisibis Turkey, then to Persia, then to Taxila (Pak), then to Murree (Pak). 2000 years ago, from Taxila, Jesus and Mary moved to a Hill near Capital of Pakistan Islamabad. In order to honor Mary, people of that Hill, named their town “Mary”. Mother Mary was now old, and she died there, and Jesus buried her on the hilltop of town “Mary”. Her 2000 years old Jewish-Style grave exists on that hilltop even today. They were British Rulers of India who in 19th century changed name of that town from “Mary” to “Murree”. So, today that town is called Murree. Then Jesus moved to Srinagar and preached lost tribes of Israel, and he died at age 120, and is buried in grave of Rozabal. These are historical facts, and these facts have nothing to do with False Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani. Please read our this magnum opus page “The best scholarly page on the life of Jesus – a treasure for the students of comparative religion”.

Following is just for the kind information of Mr. Ghamidi.

غامدی صاحب کی محبوب کتاب بخاری میں لکھا ہے چوہے، یہود کا ایک قبیلہ ہیں۔

حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ، عَنْ خَالِدٍ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ “‏ فُقِدَتْ أُمَّةٌ مِنْ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ لاَ يُدْرَى مَا فَعَلَتْ، وَإِنِّي لاَ أُرَاهَا إِلاَّ الْفَارَ إِذَا وُضِعَ لَهَا أَلْبَانُ الإِبِلِ لَمْ تَشْرَبْ، وَإِذَا وُضِعَ لَهَا أَلْبَانُ الشَّاءِ شَرِبَتْ ‏”‏‏.‏ فَحَدَّثْتُ كَعْبًا فَقَالَ أَنْتَ سَمِعْتَ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُهُ قُلْتُ نَعَمْ‏.‏ قَالَ لِي مِرَارًا‏.‏ فَقُلْتُ أَفَأَقْرَأُ التَّوْرَاةَ

ہم سے موسیٰ بن اسماعیل نے بیان کیا ، کہا ہم سے وہیب نے ، ان سے خالد نے ان سے محمد بن سیرین نے اور ان سے حضرت ابوہریرہ رضی اللہ عنہ نے کہ نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے فرمایا ، بنی اسرائیل میں کچھ لوگ غائب ہو گئے ۔ میرا تو یہ خیال ہے کہ انہیں چوہے کی صورت میں مسخ کر دیا گیا ۔ کیونکہ چوہوں کے سامنے جب اونٹ کا دودھ رکھا جاتا ہے تو وہ اسے نہیں پیتے اور اگر بکری کا دودھ رکھا جائے تو پی جاتے ہیں

The Prophet said, “A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were (un parr L’anat Parri) ….. and changed into ..CHUHAY…, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will drink it.” I told this to Ka`b who asked me, “Did you hear it from the Prophet ?” I said, “Yes.” Ka`b asked me the same question several times.; I said to Ka`b. “Do I read the Torah? (i.e. I tell you this from the Prophet.)”

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/59/113
Our one member responded one Sunni Fanatic under a video in Punjabi language which is as under. That Fanatic demanded answer in Punjabi. So we deployed our one member to respond him because that our member is also well-versed in Punjabi Language:

سنی فرقے دی کئی مشہور پرانی کتاباں وچ لکھیا اے کہ نبی محمد نے لوکاں نوں اپنیاں حدیثاں لخنے توں منع کیتا۔ پہلے خلیفہ ابوبکر نے لوکاں نوں آکھیا “لاتحدثو”، جدا معنی اے وے کہ حدیثاں سنانیاں بند کر دیو، اور صرف قران دے مطابق ای سارے مسئلے حل کرو۔ خلیفہ عمر نے لوکاں کولوں ساریاں حدیثاں کٹھیاں کر کے اوناں نو اک کھلے میدان وچ اگ نال ساڑ دتا۔ خلیفہ عمر نے نبی دے تن صحابیاں نوں اس واسطے ساری عمر دے واسطے قید کر دتا کیونکہ او تنوں، لوکاں وچ حدیثاں پھلا رہے سی۔ خلیفہ عمر نے سارے شہراں دے گورنراں نوں چٹھی لخی کہ جتھے وی کوئی حدیث ملدی اے اونوں ساڑ دیو۔ خلیفہ علی نے وی اپنے اک خطبے وچ لوکاں نوں آکھیا کہ ساریاں حدیثاں ساڑ دیو کیونکہ تواڈے توں پرانیاں قوماں دے اماماں نے اس طرح ای حدیثاں دیاں کتاباں لخیاں، اور اویا اے کہ لوک رب دی کتاب نوں بھلا کے، حدیثاں دیاں کتاباں دے پچھے لگ گئے۔ اس قسم دے سارے واقیاں توں صاف پتہ چلدا اے کہ اسلام وچ حدیثاں غیر-قانونی نیں۔ تسی ان ساریاں کتاباں دے حوالے ساڈے اس صفحے تے پڑھ سکدے او۔ صفحہ انگریزی وچ لکھیا ہے “سنت اور حدیث کی صحیح تاریخ“

امام غزالی اپنی کتاب احیا العلوم وچ لخدے نیں کہ سارے صحابی، حدیثاں لخنے توں نفرت کردے سی۔ اور سال ۷۳۷ عیسوی دے نیڑے تریڑے اس ویلے حدیثاں لخنیاں شروع ہوئیاں جدوں سارے صحابی فوت ہو چکے سی۔ کولمبیا يونیورسٹي دا اسلامی-قانون دا پروفیسر سچاچٹ لخدا اے کہ او سال ۷۲۲ عیسوی سی جدوں لوکاں نے نبی محمد دے ناں تے حدیث اور سنت دے من-گھڑت قصے لکھنا شروع کیتے۔ پروفیسر اے-وی لخدا اے کہ سال ۷۲۲ عیسوی توں پہلاں، سارے جیورسٹ یعنی فقہی صرف قران توں ہی راہنمائی لیندے سی اور او فقہی کہندے سی کہ دین دے معاملے وچ جو لوک قران توں علاوہ کتاباں وچوں اسلامی قانون بنادے نیں، او غلط کر دے نیں

سنی فرقے دیاں چھ کتاباں اور شیعہ فرقے دیاں چار کتاباں ان ایرانی اماماں نے نبی دی وفات توں ۳۰۰ سال بعد لکھیاں جن کے پارسی دادا/دادوں نے مسلماناں کولوں شکست کھادی سی۔ اسی او ساریاں کتاباں پڑھ چکے ہاں۔ ان کتاباں وچ نبی دی اور قران دی اینی توہین کیتی گئی اے کہ ایسی توہین تے چارلی ھیبڈو، گیرٹ ولڈرز، رشدی، اور نوپر شرماں نے وی نہیں کیتیMr. Ghamidi’s approach about Halal and Haram Animals: after watching Ghmidi’s videos on this subject; we have concluded that Ghamidi’s approach on this subject is totally incorrect. Sunni and Shia Mullahs and Imams are failed to understand Quran correctly in past 1200 years because instead of understanding Quran only through Quran’s own built-in dictionary, Quran’s own built in Tafsir through its own Tasreef; Sunni and Shia Mullahs have been not just running after fake fabricated stories of Sunnah and Hadiths and tafsir but from past 1200 years they also have been superimposing their forged stories of concocted hadiths on Glorious Quran. And it is sad: that approach of Mr. Ghamdi in this regard is not very different from the approach of Jaahil Sunni and Shia Imams and Mullahs. Truth is: there is only and only one way to understand Quran correctly, and that way is to understand Quran only by Quran. A person who will superimpose false stories of fake Sunnah and concocted hadiths/tafsirs on Glorious Quran will never understand Quran correctly even in 1200 years. On the subject of Halal and Haram animals, our this page can be considered a Rebuttal to Lovely Ghamidi and his all blindly-following students.Concerning subject of Crucifixion of Jesus; approach of almost all Sunni and Shia Mullahs of South Asia is absurd and nonsensical. They deliberately tamper translation of several verses of Quran in order to reconcile their some fabricated hadiths with Quran; the concocted hadiths which show: Isa ibn Maryam was gone to any remote part of Sky (God is closer than neck-vein 50:16, 57:4, 2:115) to meet God, and he will drop on a minaret of a Shami Mosque, and then he will recruit millions of insane Mullahs in order to search all fields of Sugarcane including Cuba in order to kill all Swine. Seems a pretty tough job for Isa Ibn Maryam. Not just this only but after killing all swine on this planet, now Isa bin Maryam will start to search every house of Christians along with Army of Insane Mullahs in order to break crosses. Another pretty tough job. Can a person with an healthy brain accept this kind of childish moronic tales as hadith of Prophet Mohammad PBUH? Never. Full in depth investigation shows that is story was not told by Prophet Mohammad but this story was told by Pseudo Muslim Convert Rabbi K’ab al-Ahbar to his student his excellency Abu Huraira (ex-Jew), and Abu Huraira spread this story among Muslims, and by mistake, some Muslims considered this story as hadith of Prophet. This is why: when we read this report in those books which were written before the book of Zoroastrian Bukhari; we read that not Prophet but Abu Hurairah told this story to People. Now in order to escape from the Truth of Quran, South Asian Jaahil Mullahs place blame on False Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani. If even any non-Qadiani will tell south Asian Mullahs and other fanatics that in Quran Jesus is naturally died in 5:116-117 at very old age over 100 years (Kahlan 5:110), and dead never return; those will immediately place a label of Qadiani/Ahmadi on that debater. Fact is: Though Jesus did not die on the Cross 4:157 but natural death of Isa in 5:116-5:117 never endorses false prophethood of Mirza G A Qadiani. We do not know: why has these insane Mullahs attached death of Jesus with Mirza Qadiani. We know that even Imam Malik said: “Maat isa” (Isa is died). Allama Iqbal was a big brain. He never accepted al-Ahad Hadith of Abu Hurairah which we have mentioned above. There are tons of Sunni Mullahs who have said that story of Ascension and Return of Jesus is basically a concocted Doctrine of Christians which has been infused among Muslims. On the subject of Isa, approach of Mr. Ghamidi is much better than the wrong approach of other South Asian Jaahil Mullahs but still approach of Ghamidi on this subject contains some flaws. Our following four pages can be considered as Rebuttal to Mr. Ghamidi:

What is meaning of RAFA in Quran?

Some Quranic verses about Jesus/Isa.

The Best Scholarly page on the life of Jesus – a great treasure for the students of comparative religion

Birth of Isa/Jesus in the light of Bible, Quran, and History
On 27 Jan 2023, a Member of our team sent to us this Short Video Clip-link of Mr. Ghamidi. In this video clip which has title “Barra Jurm=Big Crime; Mr. Ghamidi is saying that to eliminate something from Deen Islam is a Big Crime, and in the same way, to add/blend something in Deen Islam is also a big Crime. But it is very strange that himself Mr. Ghamidi has been committing this Big Crime from decades, and he never realized about that Bid’a which he follows. Instead, he defends his this crime in his misleading videos through totally lame and irrational arguments. The Truth which is clear to all Real Truth-seekers, is: Prophet, four Caliphs and all Sahaaba (Companions of Prophet) left behind only written Quran. Therefore; after landing of Quran, Islam=Quran; full Stop. Any rite, ritual or Sharia law which does not have roots in Quran is absolutely not part of Deen Islam. So, we beg to ask Mr. Ghamidi: where did you bring these Stories of Sunnah from? Where did you bring these Stories of Hadiths from? Where did you bring these Stories of Contexts (Asbab-Nazool) from? Where did you bring these Stories of Tafsir from? Where did Quran tell you to prostrate to Kaaba in your non-Quranic Five Zoroastrian Namaz? It is like Idol worship (pooja-pot) of Hindus. Hindu prostrate to Idol of Shiva, and you guys have converted Kaaba into an Idol by prostrating to it day and night. Quran has told us function of Kaaba in 5:95, 5:97, and those functions have to do nothing with Five Parsi Namaz. Quran has blasted these useless Namaz (Pooj-Pot) in 2:177, 2:115, 2:142. Nowhere Quran tells that Prostrating to Kaaba is part of Salat. Where did Quran tell you about Shia-Made Durood Ibrahimi and text of Tashahhud? Where did Quran ordain to kiss black stone during Hajj (like pre-Quranic Meccan Pagans)? Where did Quran ordain to walk seven rounds around Kaaba which is made of stones and cement (Practice of Pre-Quranic Meccan Pagans)? These all non-Quranic practices are Bid’a which Sunni and Shia Imams have blended in Islam, and Mr. Ghamidi: you also follow these tons of Bid’a which is “Big-Crime=Barra-Jurm)       After watching his videos and reading his authored books; it became clear to us that like all other Sectarian Shia and Sunni Mullahs, Mr. Ghamidi has failed to understand Quran correctly. But why has he failed? Its answer is: like Sunni and Shia Mullahs; Mr. Ghamidi never tried to understand self-explanatory Quran only through Quran’s own built-in Tasreef. Instead of following Tasreef of Quran, like Sunni and Shia Mullahs, he too superimposes man-made stories and Mullah’s opinions on Quran like Ustad Imam said this and Ustad Imam said that; Impostor Shafi’i said so and Hanbal said so etc. Sunni Mullah say: Ibn Kathir said so, Ibn Hajar said so, Impostor Suyuti said so, Kufi Mullah Abu Hanifa said so, Abu Haroora said so, Abu Tomato said so and Ibn Potato said so. A person who superimposes on Quran stories of Abu Harooras, Abu Tomatos and Ibn Potatos, and Ustad Imams, he cannot understand Quran correctly even in 1200 years. Responding to one Blind-Follower of Ghamidi “@Lamp” under one Video of Ghamidi

I have noted following points from your comments: You posted:
1- The Qur’an doesn’t just say “wama salaboohu” , it says “wama qataloohu , wa ma salaboohu” this means that he did not go on the cross.

2-Ghamidi sahab says that the Gospel of Barnabus gives the most plausible explanation. He never says that it is a 100% authentic
——————
Answer for your point 01
Your comments show, you have very poor knowledge on this subject like Mr. Ghamidi. Ghamidi and you even do not know the definition of CRUCIFIXION. Crucifixion means: to Kill a Person on the Cross. If person is nailed on the Cross but was removed alive; then he is not crucified. All Gospels, Historical Records, Apocrypha, Tibetan Scrolls and archeological records show that Jesus was indeed nailed on the Cross but he was not Crucified, which means: he did not die on the Cross. If you and Ghamidi say that every word of all Gospels, Historical Records, Apocrypha, Tibetan Scrolls and archeological record is wrong; then you and Ghamidi are living in the paradise of fools.

Word Shubbiha of 4:157 PROVES 100% that Jesus was indeed on the Cross. Shubbiha=Resembled to a person who is died on the Cross. But he was not dead. A Person in deeeeep coma resembles=Shubbiha=resembles a dead person. That what Quran is saying. Quran never says that Jesus was replaced by some one on the cross. Complete analysis show that this story of Replacement (Substitution) was sprouted from some Groups of gnostic Christians. Then this story was blended in Hadith books, and then Ghamidi type people started to quote that fake story

When Jesus sucked Sponge on the Cross; immediately his neck was turned a side and he appeared perfectly dead but he was not dead. So Quran says here: He was not dead on the Cross but he just resembled=Shubbiha=resembled a Person who has died on the Cross. Dr. Nicodemus who was follower of Jesus mixed special drug in that sponge so that Jesus should appear as perfectly dead; so, that they could tell Roman Governor that because Jesus is died now; so we need his body. Body was given to them. They treated Jesus in an empty Tomb and he was resuscitated on 3rd day. Nicodemus was just an instrument of God but behind this Plan, was God; and God is the best planner/schemer.

Quran 3:54 And the unbelievers schemed [against Jesus]; but God brought their scheming to nought: for God is above all schemers. (Asad)

Now, Romans could arrest him again, so he took guise of a Gardener. Arranged over 20 secret meetings with his disciples, and then secretly moved to Damascus, then to Nisibis Turkey, then to Persia; then to Herat Afghanistan; then to Taxila Pakistan; then to Murree Pakistan; then to Srinagar Kashmir. He died at age 120 and he is buried in grave of Rozabal. This whole incidence is based on historical record; and this historical record has nothing to do with your beloved false-Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani. So, tell Mr. Ghamidi that Jesus’ dead body was not lifted by Angels to sky but his dead body was buried in Grave of Rozabal; as Dust returns to Dust 20:55. It has been proved 100% that People of Kashmir are lost 10 tribes of Israel who were deported 2500 years ago by Babylonian Emperor Bakht Nasr (Nebuchadnezzar).

Aquarian Gospel also says: Jesus moved to Kashmir. Restored Gospel of Nazarene also tells; after surviving death on the cross, Jesus immigrated to East of Parthian Empire which means: land which covers Pak, Afghan, and Kashmir. Quranic verse 23:50 tells that Jesus and his Mother became Refugee Muhaajar. Historian Tabari writes. Jesus and his mother left Palestine and they wandered country to country to have refuge. Now I ask you and Ghamidi: was Tabari follower of Mirza G A Qadiani?

Historian Tabari (839-923 CE) wrote “God sent Jesus to call Israelite toward true path but they denied him; and Jesus and his mother Mary had to leave Palestine and travel to distant land, wandering from country to country”

It is written in over 36 Well-known Ancient Books of Sunni Sect that Prophet Mohammad said that Jesus died at age 120. So. will you and Ghamidi say now that Prophet Mohammad was also a Ahmadi or Qadiani?

وَجَعَلْنَا ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ وَأُمَّهُۥٓ ءَايَةً وَءَاوَيْنَـٰهُمَآ إِلَىٰ رَبْوَةٍ ذَاتِ قَرَارٍ وَمَعِينٍ

Quran 23:50 And We made the son of Mary and his mother a sign, and gave them refuge on high ground—where there was a meadow and a flowing spring

Note that in verse 23:50, proto root of word “waāwaynāhumā” is “TO GIVE refuge”, This verse has also used word “Rabwa” which mean, High Ground, High Hilly place. Also note, this verse has used words “where there was a meadow and a flowing spring”. Now think, which landscape fits in verse 23:50. Kashmir and Murree (where Mary is buried) fit 100% in verse 23:50. Jerusalem never fits because Murree and Srinagar are much higher than sea-level than Jerusalem. Beside Kashmir is land of meadow and a flowing spring. Jerusalem is not. Murree is 2291 meter higher from sea-level and Srinagar is 1585 meter higher than sea-level. But Jerusalem is mere 754 meter above sea level. Distance between Murree (old name Mary) and Srinagar is about 130 km.

2- Your second Point:
Gospel of Barnabas is a Fabricated Book which was forged by a Turk. All Bible scholars have graded it as Forgery. Even some Muslim Scholars have graded it a Forged book. *Those Bible Scholars who are Atheists, are neutral on this subject, and even they say: that book of Barnabas is forgery. It is only you and this Ghamidi who love that Forged Book of Barnabas but you do not follow, what Quran says. Ghamidi tells a bigggggg Joke that after death of Jesus, Angels came and lifted dead body of Jesus to Sky. This is 101% funny childish tale.

You, and Ghamidi MUST Learn that:*
God says in Quran 20:55 (in Torah Genesis 3:19 too) that man is made of Dust and he will return to Dust. Will not go to Sky. Human body, alive or dead cannot enter in the Spiritual Realm of Allah Azza wa Jal. Read Quran 7:143. After death, only Ruh is raised 32:11, 3:55, and body made of dust returns to Dust.

Sufi Poet MMB wrote:

حکمے باہجھ نہ نکلن ہوندا، جے سو کرے تیاری
پنچھی تنگ پیا وچ پنجرے، کیوں کر کرے اڈاری

As I have mentioned in my other comments that there are over 36 well-known Ancient Books of Sunni sect which say that Prophet Mohammad told that Jesus died at age 120, and I will have half life of Jesus, so I will die at 60. There are over 6 reports in Bukhari, Muwatta, Sahih-Muslim and Tirmidhi which show that Last Prophet died not at 63 but died at age 60.

Ibn Rushd al-Jadd (died 520 Hijri) was one of the greatest Maliki scholars and Jurists. He wrote in his well-known book “Al-Bayaan wal Tehseel” following hadith:

ربیعة عن أنس في الموطأ، بدلیل ما روي عن عائشة أنها كانت تقول عَلَیْهِ وَسَلَّمَ – قال لفاطمة ابنته في مرضه الذي مات فیه مما سارها به وأخبرت به عائشة بعد وفاته، قالت عائشة: أخبرتني أنه أخبرها أنه لم یكن نبي كان بعد نبي إلا عاش نصف عمر الذي كان قبله وأخبرني أن عیسى عاش عشرین ومائة سنة ولا أراني إلا ذاهبا على ستین

Do you understand Arabic? We do not know but we know: Mr. Ghamidi knows basic Arabic

Above-given Arabic text says: Prophet Mohammad said that Jesus lived 120 years and I will half life of Jesus. Same report is given in over 36 books.

عیسى عاش عشرین ومائة سنة

120 years = عشرین ومائة سنة

Now I ask you and Mr. Ghamidi. Was Ibn Rushd al-Jadd follower of false Prophet Mirza G A Qadiani?

Also tell me: was Prophet Mohammad follower of Mirza Qadiani?

And secular (no-Religious) Research also shows that Jesus died at age 120

We read in Muwatta:
حَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَهُ يَقُولُ كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لَيْسَ بِالطَّوِيلِ الْبَائِنِ وَلاَ بِالْقَصِيرِ وَلَيْسَ بِالأَبْيَضِ الأَمْهَقِ وَلاَ بِالآدَمِ وَلاَ بِالْجَعْدِ الْقَطَطِ وَلاَ بِالسَّبِطِ بَعَثَهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى رَأْسِ أَرْبَعِينَ سَنَةً فَأَقَامَ بِمَكَّةَ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ وَبِالْمَدِينَةِ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ وَتَوَفَّاهُ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ عَلَى رَأْسِ سِتِّينَ سَنَةً وَلَيْسَ فِي رَأْسِهِ وَلِحْيَتِهِ عِشْرُونَ شَعْرَةً بَيْضَاءَ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏.‏

Translation: Yahya related to me from Malik that Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman heard Anas ibn Malik say, “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, was not excessively tall or short. He was not very pallid nor dark. He did not have curly hair or lank hair. Allah commissioned him at the age of forty. He stayed in Makka ten years and at Madina for ten years and Allah the Mighty, the Majestic made him die when he was sixty. There were not twenty white hairs in his hair or beard, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.”

We read in Bukhari and also same in Sahih-Muslim:
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ يُوسُفَ، أَخْبَرَنَا مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَهُ يَقُولُ كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لَيْسَ بِالطَّوِيلِ الْبَائِنِ وَلاَ بِالْقَصِيرِ، وَلاَ بِالأَبْيَضِ الأَمْهَقِ، وَلَيْسَ بِالآدَمِ وَلَيْسَ بِالْجَعْدِ الْقَطَطِ وَلاَ بِالسَّبْطِ، بَعَثَهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى رَأْسِ أَرْبَعِينَ سَنَةً، فَأَقَامَ بِمَكَّةَ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ، وَبِالْمَدِينَةِ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ، فَتَوَفَّاهُ اللَّهُ، وَلَيْسَ فِي رَأْسِهِ وَلِحْيَتِهِ عِشْرُونَ شَعْرَةً بَيْضَاءَ‏.‏

Translation: Narrated Anas: Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was neither very tall nor short, neither absolutely white nor deep brown. His hair was neither curly nor lank. Allah sent him (as an Apostle) when he was forty years old. Afterwards he resided in Mecca for ten years and in Medina for ten more years. When Allah took him unto Him, there was scarcely twenty white hairs in his head and beard.

Note: 40+10+10=60 years.

Bukhari >> Translation in Urdu:
ہم سے عبداللہ بن یوسف نے بیان کیا ، انہوں نے کہا ہم کو مالک بن انس نے خبر دی ، انہیں ربیعہ بن ابی عبدالرحمٰن نے اور انہوں نے انس بن مالک رضی اللہ عنہ سے سنا ، آپ نے کہا کہ رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نہ بہت لمبے تھے اور نہ چھوٹے قد کے ، نہ بالکل سفید تھے اور نہ گندمی رنگ کے ۔ نہ آپ کے بال بہت زیادہ گھونگھریالے تھے اور نہ بالکل سیدھے لٹکے ہوئے ، اللہ تعالیٰ نے آپ کو چالیس سال کی عمر میں نبوت دی اور آپ نے مکہ میں دس سال تک قیام کیا اور مدینہ میں دس سال تک قیام کیا ۔ جب اللہ تعالیٰ نے آپ کو وفات دی تو آپ کے سر اور داڑھی کے بیس بال بھی سفید نہیں تھے ۔

Near me: being a Muslim 22:78, that Divine Book is enough for me which Last Prophet, Prophet Mohammad and even 4 Caliphs left behind, and that is only written Quran 6:19, 6:114, 10:15. But I have posted these so called hadiths just for you and for those, who build their faith also on hadith books.

Quran is the most beautiful Book, as it fully explains itself through its own Tasreef. But people like Ghamidi, when superimpose on Quran man-made stories; then such kind of people cannot understand Quran correctly even in 1200 years. On Jesus, Quran is very clear:

Jesus did not die on the Cross=Not Crucified 4:157

Jesus raised in Honor and Spiritual exaltation 4:158 (Body never goes to Sky. Dust returns to Dust 20:55).
We read in Sahih-Muslim, a person who humbles to people for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal, Allah Jalla Aala RAISES (RAFA) him.

In this hadith, same word RAFA is used which exists in 4:158. If we translate here word RAFA to take dead or alive body to Sky; then above-mentioned hadith will translate as:

Prophet said: a person who humbles to people for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal, Allah Jalla Aala RAISES (RAFA) his Body to Sky. Does it make sense? Word RAFA is also used in several other verses of Quran for TO RAISE IN RANKS/Honor

In verse 4:159, word MouteHi points to death of every person of People of Book. But Sunni and Shia translators tamper translation of verse 4:159, 180 degree opposite in order to support their fable of ascension and return of Jesus.

3:55 tells: Person dies and then his soul is raised=Spiritual Exaltation. See 32:11 too. This verse never tells that After death, Angels came and lifted body of Jesus to Sky, as Ghamidi has told this funny story.

Verse 3:144 tells that all Rasool before Mohammad are died. So Jesus is naturally died too.

In verse 43:61 no any name of Jesus appears but Sunni and Shia translators blend name of Jesus in 43:61, In several verses of Quran, word INNA-HU is used for Quran; not for Jesus; and same word Inna-hu is used in 43:61 for Quran.

Word “Kahlan” of Verse 5:110 shows: Jesus lived over 90 years. Ancient Arabic Literature shows that Kahlan is that old age when skin of person starts to putrefy and that is above 90.

5:116-117
Even 5th grader in School knows that WAFAT means: death. In 10:46, same word WAFAT is used for the death of Prophet Mohmmad. So Jesus died in 5:116-117 and dead never return. After death, DUST RETURNS TO DUST>> to Grave 20:55

مثال کے طور پر اگر اخبار میں شائع ہوتا ہے کہ مولوی ڈیزل وفات پا گیا ہے تو اس کا مطلب یہ ہے مولوی ڈیزل مر گیا ہے۔ یہ نہیں کہ مولوی ڈیزل کا چربی سے بھرا ہوا ۲۵۰ پونڈ کا جسم فرشتے اٹھا کر لے گیئے ہیں اسمان کی طرف۔ اتنے بھاری بندے کو اٹھانے کے لیے بڑی کرین درکار ہو گی یا سی-۱۳۰ جہاز

This is the whole Truth. But Sunni and Shia deny this Quranic truth and place blame on false Prophet Mirza G A QadianiPlease note: if through Quran’s own Tasreef, we precisely analyze all those verses which are relevant to Hajj directly and indirectly; it becomes quite clear that four sacred months are also months of Hajj, and names of those four sacred months are 9th (Ramadan), 10th Shawwal, 11th Dhu al-Qa’da, and 12th Dhu al-Ḥijja. But what we see in fabricated hadiths books; that is concoction of hypocrites which is mentioned in verse 9:37. Those hypocrites changed original scared months. During Hajj, there becomes stamped several times which has so far killed thousands of Pilgrims. This problem of stampede can be solved if relevant authorities conduct Hajj two to four times during four sacred months. According to Quran, Hajj season starts on First Ramadan, and Hajj of that first day is “Hajj al-Akbar”Prototype Mullahs and Pseudo Scholars do not have courage to face the truth. So, they do not permit to appear any comments under their videos which can challenge their false preaching, rationally. A member of our team posted following comments under above-shown video but “Ghamidi and Ilyas Co.” blocked those comments. However, we have copied those comments which were posted under above-shown video, and we have reproduced those comments as under

Hassan Ilyas failed to answer correctly. Mere a degree from Medina University or from Islamabad University is not a guarantee, that Degree holder is truthful Preacher because since year 722 CE; Curricula of of Islamic theological Faculties is Fake. Fake Curricula means Fake Degrees. Ghamidi and Hassan Ilyas even do not know what is meaning of Ibadat. It is not Pooja pot=5 Zoroastrian Namaz imported from Zoroastrians. Salat is not Namaz. Root of word Ibadat is in ABD/ABEED. Which mean TO SERVE; not Pooja-pot. And a Servant obeys orders of his Master. Abd-Allah=Servant of Allah. Servant never does pooja-pot of his Master like Idol worshippers. When you follow laws of Quran; then you are serving your Master which means: you are doing Ibadat. Namaz Pooja Pot is useless >> 2:177, 2:142, 22:18, 55:6

Deen of Meccan Pagans and Deen of Islam is not same. which means: Way of living of Pagans was not same as of Divinely living of Muslims. Deen: Divinely prescribed way of life. Islam is not Madhab. Nowhere Quran has called DEEN as Madhab.

Quran has ordained in 3:103 La Tafarraku. Meaning of Word Firqa are broad. It means: do not make in Muslim Ummah any kind of Division, grouping Split and Sect. Qurans tells in 6:159 that all those people who did any kind of Division, grouping Split and made Sects in Islam; they are OUT from the fold of Islam, and Hell is waiting for them 3:105. So Sunni Shia Hanafi Malaki, Shafi’i and Hanabli have created SPLIT in Islam, and they are OUT from the fold of Islam. God has named us in Quran 22:78 only Muslims

Prophet Mohammad and even 4 Caliphs left behind only written Quran. Neither they left behind nor they certified even one report of Hadith, Tafsir, Sunnah and Fiqah as SAHIH. All books of Sunnah Seera Hadiths Contexts Tafsir Mutually-Conflicting Fiqah are FORGERIES of Sunni and Shia sects. Islam=Quran; Full Stop. Any Sharia law, rite or Namaz which does not have roots in Quran is NOT part of Deen al-Islam.

Quran is pretty big book. Nowhere Quran tells us to follow so called Sunnah and Hadith of Mortal Man 18:110 Mohammad PBUH. God tells Rasool in 2:272, 72:21, 28:56 that O Rasool: It is not your job to guide people but your ONLY Job is to deliver Quran clearly 29:18, 42L48, 5:99, 5:92, 3:20. Now a rational question arises, which is: when a Man cannot guide people toward Right Path 72:21; then what is the utility of his Sunnah and Hadiths?

Quran talks about Oswat-Hasana of Rasool but did Rasool and 4 Caliphs leave behind any manuscript of Sunnah Hadiths Contexts Tafsir Fiqah Seera and Oswat-hasana? NO. NOT AT ALL. Because they knew that Authentic Oswat of Rasool is already incorporated within ethical codes of Quran. This is why: Aisha RA said: The Quran is Akhlaaq of Rasool-Allah
القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

If Sunnah, Hadiths, Tafsir, Contexts, Seera etc. were part of Deen al-Islam; then it was very easy for 4 Caliphs to compile books of Sunnah, Hadiths, Tafsir, Contexts, Seera along with Quran. But did they? No. Even we read in tons of Books of Sunni Sect that during the life time of Rasool and 4 Caliphs, writing of Hadiths, Sunnah, and Tafsir were forbidden. In the era of Caliph Umar RA, it was a punishable crime to write or verbally narrate any hadith of Rasool. But three Sahaaba were still narrating. So Umar RA summoned them and asked: What are these Hadiths of Rasool which you are spreading among Muslims? Then he placed them under house arrest FOR LIFE. They were freed only after the death of Umar. Caliph Umar refused to write SUNNAH of Rasool. It is documented in several top Books of Sunni sect. Read proof here.

Mr Taimur: do you know that 6 so called hadith Books of Sunni sect including Bukhari; and 4 books of Shia sects were FORGED 250-400 years after the death of Prophet? If Books of Hadiths were integral part of Deen al-Islam; then why four caliphs did not manage to compile those six books of Sunni sect which were compiled by 6 Pseudo Persian Imams of defeated Zoroastrian ancestry? As I have mentioned that truth is: during era of Rasool and 4 Caliphs; there was ban on writing of Hadith and Sunnah. According to Imam al-Ghazali and Professor of Islamic law of Columbia University J. Schacht; that was year 738 CE/722 CE when Hadiths and Sunnah tales started to be fabricated in the name of Mohammad. Schacht writes that up to year 722 CE; all Jurists used to consult ONLY Quran. They used to say that any Islamic law taken from other books except Quran is erroneous.

In Quran, only two kinds of Sunnah appears; Sunnah of Allah Azza wa Jal; and Sunnah of bad people of past. No any term Sunnah-of-Rasool appears in whole Quran. Ghamidi and Hassan Ilyas do not know even basics of Deen al-Islam. They are just two Mullahs like all other Sectarian Mullahs.

All the 13 narrators who have narrated marriage age of Aisha RA as 6 year and 9 years were Shia who belonged to Basra and Kufa which were hub of Shia. Those people who have read history of Islam know that Shia abuse Abu Bakar RA and Aisha RA. Ibn Ishaq was supporter of Ali-yads=Shia. He forged that 9 year marriage age and said he has taken that hadith from Ibn Arwa but Ibn Arwa said: Ibn Ishaq is forger. Then that Hadith was recorded by Fadl bin Dukin who was an ardent Shia. Please note that same Fadl bin Dukin was also Teacher of  Zoro Bukhari.

Obeying Allah and Rasool is obeying only that Divine Book which Rasool left behind for us and that is Quran only 6:114, 25:30, 6:19, 10:15, 50:45, 16:116, 28:55
It is clear in Quran that during preaching and Judgment; Rasool was BOUND to follow only Quran 5:44-48, 12:106, 42:10, 42:10, 6:114, 6:19, 10:15, 39:13, 50:45, 16:116, 10:59-60, 7:32, 7:2-3, 11:18, 66:1, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 3:80, 18:110, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 42:48, 3:20, 2:213, 16:64, 24:54, 36:17, 13:40, 16:35, 16:82, 64:12, 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 25:30, 25:33, 29:51, 45:6, 46:9, 28:85, 42:15, 2:159, 7:157, 47:2

What is Deen al-Islam?
Answer is very Simple, which is: after landing of Noble Quran; Islam=Quran; FULL STOP. Any rite, ritual and Islamic law (Sharia law) which does not have roots in fully detailed 6:114 complete 16:89 Quran, is ABSOLUTELY NOT part of Deen al-Islam 6:114, 28:85, 10:15, 6:19.
Being a Muslim, when you are following all law and codes of Glorious Quran sincerely; that means: you are doing Ibadat and you are Obeying Allah and his Rasool because Rasool was no more than AN AGENCY of Allah Jalla Aala, and that point has been made very clear in verses 39:41, 6:107, 29:18, 5:92, 5:99, 3:20, 24:54, 42:6, 42:48, 64:12, 16:64, 2:213, 39:41, 18:110, 28:56, 72:21, 2:272, 27:92, 50:45. 12:111, 16:89, 17:12, 6:114, 10:15, 6:19, 13:40, 3:80, 75:19.

Islam=Quran; full stop

إِنَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانَ يَهْدِى لِلَّتِى هِىَ أَقْوَمُ وَيُبَشِّرُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَعْمَلُونَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ أَنَّ لَهُمْ أَجْرًا كَبِيرًا

Quran 17:9 VERILY, this Qur’an shows the way to all that is most upright, and gives the believers who do good deeds the glad tiding that theirs will be a great reward; (Asad)

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِى فَرَضَ عَلَيْكَ ٱلْقُرْءَانَ لَرَآدُّكَ إِلَىٰ مَعَادٍ قُل رَّبِّىٓ أَعْلَمُ مَن جَآءَ بِٱلْهُدَىٰ وَمَنْ هُوَ فِى ضَلَـٰلٍ مُّبِينٍ

Quran 28:85 VERILY, He who has laid down this Qur’an in plain terms, making it binding on thee, will assuredly bring thee back [from death] to a life renewed. Say [unto those who reject the truth]: My Sus­tainer knows best, as to who is right-guided and who is obviously lost in error!”

نَّحْنُ أَعْلَمُ بِمَا يَقُولُونَ وَمَآ أَنتَ عَلَيْهِم بِجَبَّارٍ فَذَكِّرْ بِٱلْقُرْءَانِ مَن يَخَافُ وَعِيدِ

Quran 50:45 Fully aware are We of what they [who deny resurrection] do say; and thou canst by no means force them [to believe in it]. Yet none the less, remind, through this Qur’an, all such as may fear My warning.

أَفَغَيْرَ ٱللَّهِ أَبْتَغِى حَكَمًا وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِىٓ أَنزَلَ إِلَيْكُمُ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ مُفَصَّلًا وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاتَيْنَـٰهُمُ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ يَعْلَمُونَ أَنَّهُۥ مُنَزَّلٌ مِّن رَّبِّكَ بِٱلْحَقِّ فَلَا تَكُونَنَّ مِنَ ٱلْمُمْتَرِينَ

Quran 6:114 [say thou:] ‘Am I, then, to look unto anyone but God for judgment [as to what is right and wrong], when it is He who has bestowed upon you from on high this divine writ, clearly spelling out the truth?’ And those unto whom We have vouchsafed revelation aforetime know that this one, too, has been bestowed from on high, step by step, by thy Sustainer. Be not, then, among the doubters-

قُلْ أَىُّ شَىْءٍ أَكْبَرُ شَهَـٰدَةً قُلِ ٱللَّهُ شَهِيدٌۢ بَيْنِى وَبَيْنَكُمْ وَأُوحِىَ إِلَىَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانُ لِأُنذِرَكُم بِهِۦ وَمَنۢ بَلَغَ أَئِنَّكُمْ لَتَشْهَدُونَ أَنَّ مَعَ ٱللَّهِ ءَالِهَةً أُخْرَىٰ قُل لَّآ أَشْهَدُ قُلْ إِنَّمَا هُوَ إِلَـٰهٌ وَٰحِدٌ وَإِنَّنِى بَرِىٓءٌ مِّمَّا تُشْرِكُونَ

Quran 6:19 Say: ‘What could most weightily bear witness to the truth?’ Say: ‘God is witness between me and you; and this Qur’an has been revealed unto me so that on the strength thereof I might warn you and all whom it may reach.’ Could you in truth bear witness that there are other deities side by side with God? Say: ‘I bear no [such] witness!’ Say: ‘He is the One God; and, behold, far be it from me to ascribe divinity, as, you do, to aught beside Him!’

وَإِذَا تُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَايَاتُنَا بَيِّنَـٰتٍ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَرْجُونَ لِقَآءَنَا ٱئْتِ بِقُرْءَانٍ غَيْرِ هَـٰذَآ أَوْ بَدِّلْهُ قُلْ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أُبَدِّلَهُۥ مِن تِلْقَآئِ نَفْسِىٓ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّ إِنِّىٓ أَخَافُ إِنْ عَصَيْتُ رَبِّى عَذَابَ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ

Quran 10:15 When Our clear revelations are recited to them, those who do not expect to meet with Us say, ‘Bring [us] a different Quran, or change it.’ [Prophet], say, ‘It is not for me to change it of my own accord; I only follow what is revealed to me, for I fear the torment of an awesome Day, if I were to disobey my Lord.

The Madhab` which Ghamidi and Ilyas follow is that Counterfeited Religion which was invented during Pro-Zoroastrian and Pro-Persian Abbasid Caliphs. The Madhab` which Ghamidi and Ilyas follow has no relation with that Pristine Deen Islam which existed before year 722 CE. Ghamidi and his blind-follower student Ilyas are just another two typical prototype Mullahs of South Asia. They know nothing about True Deen Islam.

Just ask these two Mullahs following rational Question:

Did Rasool and 4 Caliphs leave behind any manuscript of so called Sunnah, Hadiths, Contexts (asbab-nazool), conflicting-Fiqah, seera, and Tafsir? No. Then where did Ghamidi and Ilyas bring that so called Sunnah and Hadiths from? Prophet and 4 Caliphs left behind only written Quran. Therefore; after landing of Quran, Islam=Quran, Full Stop. Any law, rite or Zoroastrian Namaz which does not have roots in Glorious Quran is not part of Deen al-Islam. Salat is not Namaz. Quran is pretty big book. Allah Azza wa Jal says that his Quran is fully detailed and complete 6:114, 16:89. But we do not see even number of Rak’at of each Namaz Ritual of Sunni and Shia sects.

Concerning Heritance law, if Quran can tell us fractions of heritance shares like 1/2, 1/6, 1/3; then what was difficult for God to tell us number of Rak’at of 5 Namaz?

Quran tells in 24:41 that even birds follow Salat. If Salat is Namaz; then, do birds pray like Sunni or Shia? They follow their mission and strife which has been ordered by their Lord.

Nowhere Quran tells to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba during Salat. Nowhere Quran tells that placing forehead on ground toward Kaaba is part of Salat. Quran tells us in 22:18, 55:6 that even Elephant, Lion, Stars, Moon and Mountains do Sujud/Sajadah. In Quran if meaning of Sajadah is to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba; then, have you ever seen any Lion or Elephant entering in any Masjid of Sunni or Shia sect; doing Istanja; doing Wudu; shouting loudly Non-Quranic Shia Azan or Sunni Azan? It depends if Elephant is Sunni or Shia. And then placing forehead toward Mecca?

In Quran if meaning of Sajadah is to place forehead on ground toward Kaaba; then, have you ever seen Mountain Himalaya entering in any Masjid of Sunni or Shia sect; doing Istanja; doing Wudu; shouting loudly Non-Quranic Shia Azan or Sunni Azan? It depends if Himalaya is Sunni or Shia. In Quran, meaning of Sajadah is: HUMBLE TO DIVINE LAW (not to place forehead on Ground like Idol worshipers).

Quran has told us function of Kaaba in 5:95 and 5:97 and those functions have nothing to do with Five Zoroastrian Parsi Namaz.

So, Islam is not a Theocracy=Mullah’ism, Imam’ism=Religion=Madhab of Namaz Pooja Pot but Islam is Deen = Divinely prescribed way of Life, in which, Namaz Pooja pot is declared Useless in verse 2:177, 2:115. Verse 2:177 loudly tells us that Namaz is not a good deed but Good deed is to be Muslim 4:136, follow Divine Law 6:114 and live as a Righteous Philanthropist. This is Pristine Deen Islam. Like majority of Mullahs, Ghamidi too has badly tampered translation of following verse 2:177

لَّيْسَ ٱلْبِرَّ أَن تُوَلُّوا۟ وُجُوهَكُمْ قِبَلَ ٱلْمَشْرِقِ وَٱلْمَغْرِبِ

Philanthropy>2:177> Serve and respect your parents, help relatives, poor, disabled, jobless, wayfarer, who is under bondage, take care of your children and wife, give help to those who ask for help. This is beauty of Islam. God is not in need of your 5 Namaz which were imported from Zoroastrians and then were validated through forgery of hadith of clandestine funny Flying Horse Buraq.

Ibadat is not Worship=Pooja Pot. Word Ibadat has roots “ABD”=Servant. Like name ABD-ALLAH عبدالله= Servant of Allah. A servant never prostrates to his Master but obeys orders of his Master. So when you obey all Laws and Codes of your Master which He has given in Quran, then you are doing Ibadat and you are always in the state of Sujud/Sajdah. For example: when you helped your poor relative physically and Financially, you did Ibadat of Allah Azza wa Jal.

Namaz Pooja pot is 101% Idol worship in which Sunni or Shia worship Kaaba which is made of Stones and Cement. Saint Rabia Basri said: People have converted Kaaba into an Idol which is now worshiped by them.

Quran tells us in several verses 50:16, 57:3, 57:4, 58:7, 2:115, 2:142, 2:177, 2:186, 24:35, 67:13, 20:7, 13:9-10, 56:83-84-85, 4:108, 6:59, 2:255, 6:103, 34:50, 11:61, 5:109, 7:7, 4:126, 10:61 that God is OMNIPRESENT which means: God is not confined to any one City or Cubical Building or to any special direction which is to be measured by compass.

وَلِلَّهِ ٱلْمَشْرِقُ وَٱلْمَغْرِبُ فَأَيْنَمَا تُوَلُّوا۟ فَثَمَّ وَجْهُ ٱللَّهِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ وَٰسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ

Whichever direction you turn, there is presence of God 2:115.

God is with you wherever you may be 57:4

وَهُوَ مَعَكُمْ أَيْنَ مَا كُنتُمْ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ

God is closer to you than even your neck vain 50:16
So If God is so close to you; then why should you search God in Mecca which is thousands km far from you? Why then you search God in Sky?

“The musk is in the deer, but it seeks it not within itself: it wanders in quest of grass”

And Sunni and Shia seek it in Mecca or in Sky.
وَسِعَ كُرْسِيُّهُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضَAnswering an Impostor “Sam Shamoun”

You Evangelists have corrupted your books and your minds too, but in past 1400 years, Sectarian Shia and Sunni Mullahs and Imams failed to tamper Original Arabic Text of Noble Quran because being the Final Book of God, God has protected its original Arabic Text (Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42). But Mullahs tamper translation of Quran in order to reconcile stories of their fabricated hadiths with Quran.

Quran makes clear; and Gospel of John 20:11…20:16 and Gospel of Luke 24:37…24:40 also make clear that Jesus was NOT KILLED on the Cross; that means: he was NOT CRUCIFIEFD.

But Quran tells in 5:110 (Kahlan), that later Jesus lived over 100 years. Verse 5:117 tells that he died naturally, and dead never come back. This is what Quran has said. According to ancient Arabic literature, age of Kahlan is that very old age when human skin starts to putrefy. 

In over 25 verses of Quran, word WAFAT is used for natural death. Same word WAFAT is used in Quran 10:46 for the natural death of Prophet Mohammad; and same word WAFAT is used in 3:55, 5:117 for the Natural death of Prophet Isa (Jesus). This makes clear that though Jesus did not die on the Cross but he died naturally when his age was over 100 years >> 120 years.

But when Mullahs translate verse 5:117; instead of translating word WAFAT as death of Jesus, they switch their Car into different gear, and now, they translate word WAFAT of 3:55, 5:117 as “TO TAKE JESUS ALIVE TO HEAVENS”. This is 100% tampering. Sectarian Mullahs’ brains are hijacked by Satan Iblis. They have been committing this Crime of Tampering for centuries ONLY in order to reconcile stories of their fabricated hadith with Quran. These Criminals of Superlative-degree SUPERIMPOSE on Quran, stories of their fabricated hadiths and concocted Tafsir, and in this way, they change the meaning of verses. No one has harmed Islam and Muslims more than these freak Mullahs.

Quran 39:42
ٱللَّهُ يَتَوَفَّى ٱلْأَنفُسَ حِينَ مَوْتِهَا وَٱلَّتِى لَمْ تَمُتْ فِى مَنَامِهَا فَيُمْسِكُ ٱلَّتِى قَضَىٰ عَلَيْهَا ٱلْمَوْتَ وَيُرْسِلُ ٱلْأُخْرَىٰٓ إِلَىٰٓ أَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى إِنَّ فِى ذَٰلِكَ لَـَٔايَـٰتٍ لِّقَوْمٍ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ

This verse 39:42 is telling us that during sleep, God takes Soul of Person, and Soul is not returned to those bodies which are decreed for death, but Souls of others who will still live, are returned to body.

Law of death is: when a Person dies, the Original Person “Soul/Spirit” is raised to God, and body which is made of Dust returns to Dust (Quran 20:55). It never goes to Heaven.

Now, what this verse has to do with Jesus? Nothing. But Mullahs in one way or an other way want to follow Fiction of Ascension and Return of Jesus.

In verse 39:42, when Soul of sleeping person is taken by God; then man sleeps usually 6 to 8 hours, and at morning, his soul is returned to his body. Is Jesus sleeping in any five star hotel in any remote part of Sky from 2000 years? No. He is dead, and his grave exists in RozaBal. We know that Mirza G A Qadiani was a false Prophet but all historical evidence shows, that in grave of Rozabal no one else is buried but Jesus. 

Do you even know that Fable of Ascension and Return of Jesus never existed in old copies of your Four Gospels? This fable was blended in Gospels by Church, much later in order to impress new converts that Pauline-Christianity is a Supernatural Dogma. And also, Quran never supports fable of Ascension and Return of Jesus, but Mullahs tamper translation of relevant verses.

Correct translation of 5:116-117 is done by Dr. Mohammad Asad PhD as under (in these verses, natural death of Jesus is mentioned; not death on Cross 4:157). All verbs in following verses are in past tense which confirms, that after the natural death Jesus in Quran 5:117, Jesus’ soul was raised to God; and at that time, following conversation between God and Jesus was taken place, but there are some nasty Pseudo Scholars, who say that: that conversation will be held on the day of Judgment but we do not see any word of day of Judgement in verses 5:116-117. God is always with man 57:4. God is closer to person than his neck-vein 50:16 but human eye cannot see God during this earthy life, but after death; Soul/Spirit can see everything even across a 100 meter thick cemented wall. Also read Quran 32:11, and 6:94. In following verses, we have made those verbs “Bold” which are in past tense. 

Quran 5:116-117 AND LO! God said: O Jesus, son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, `Worship me and my mother as deities beside God’?’ [Jesus] answered: ‘Limitless art Thou in Thy glory! It would not have been possible for me to say what I had no right to [say]! Had I said this, Thou wouldst indeed have known it! Thou knowest all that is within myself, whereas I know not what is in Thy Self. Verily, it is Thou alone who fully knowest all the things that are beyond the reach of a created being’s perception. (Asad). 

Nothing did I tell them beyond what Thou didst bid me [to say]: `Worship God, [who is] my Sustainer as well as your Sustainer.’ And I bore witness to what they did as long as I dwelt in their midst; but since Thou hast caused me to die, Thou alone hast been their keeper: for Thou art witness unto everything. (Asad) See also 3:55ایک جاہل سنی کو جواب دیتے ہوئے-
حضور- اپ کی بات میں نہ کوئی وزن ہے نہ ہی کوئی دلیل ہے۔ اپ فرقہ پرستوں ۳:۱۰۳ کی یہ عادت ہے خالی بڑھکیں مارنا اور ایسی بات کرنا جس کا نہ سر ہو نہ پیر ہو۔ اپ کے جاہل استادوں نے جو جہالت اپ کو سکھائی ہے وہی جہالت اپ اگلی نسل کو منتقل کر رہے ہیں، یعنی بھیڑ چال چل رہے ہیں اور جہالت پر فخر کرتے ہوئے اپ اسے تقلید کہتے ہیں ۲:۱۷۰۔۔

وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمُ ٱتَّبِعُوا۟ مَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ قَالُوا۟ بَلْ نَتَّبِعُ مَآ أَلْفَيْنَا عَلَيْهِ ءَابَآءَنَآ أَوَلَوْ كَانَ ءَابَآؤُهُمْ لَا يَعْقِلُونَ شَيْـًٔا وَلَا يَهْتَدُونَ

اپ مجھے بتائیں کہ خاتم الأنبياء عليه السلام نے، چار خلفاء رضي الله عنهم نے اور تمام صحابہ رضي الله عنهم نے پیچھے کون سی لکھی ہوئی کتاب مسلمانوں کے چھوڑی تھی؟ انہوں نے صرف اور صرف لکھا ہوا قران ہی چھوڑا ٦:۱۹، ٦:۱۱۴۔ اس لیے اگر اپ رسول، اور صحابہ کو فالو کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو جناب: اس کتاب کو فالو کریں جو رسول نے، چار خلفاء نے اور تمام صحابہ نے پیچھے چھوڑی ہے اور وہ کتاب صرف قران-الحکیم ہے۔ یہ سیرت، فقہ، تفسیر، سنت، اسباب-نزول اور احادیث کی کتب اس وقت گھڑی گیئں جب رسول فوت ہو چکے تھے، چار خلفاء فوت ہو چکے تھے اور سب کے سب صحابہ بھی فوت ہو چکے تھے، سوڈو-امام پارسی بخاری کی روایات کو ذاتی طور پر صحیح کا درجہ دینے کے لیے کوئی بھی صحابی زندہ نہ تھا۔ اور الکافی اور نہج-البلاغہ کی روایات کی ذاتی طور پر تصدیق کرنے کے لیے خلیفہ علی زندہ نہ تھے۔ پھر، ان سنی سنائی گپ شپ جسے اپ نے احادیث کا نام دے رکھا ہے کو کیسے صحیح مانا جائے؟ کیا اپ کی عقل کام کرتی ہے؟

گامے نے ماجے سے سنا، اس نے ساجے سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ٹماٹو سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ڈیزل سے سنا کہ رسول نے کہا کہ کالے کتے شیطان ہیں (خرافات من صحیح-مسلم)۔ گامے نے ماجے سے سنا، اس نے ساجے سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ٹماٹو سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ڈیزل سے سنا کہ قران کی رجم کی ایات ایک بدکار سنی بکری کھا گئی ہے (خرافات من پارسی منافق ابن-ماجہ ۱۹۴۴)۔ خدا، قران ۱۵:۹ میں فرماتا ہے کہ وہ قران کا محافظ ہے إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا ٱلذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُۥ لَحَـٰفِظُونَ لیکن ابن-ماجہ بتا رہا ہے کہ وہ بدکار سنی بکری اس سے بھی زیادہ طاقتور تھی جس نے قران کی حفاظت کا ذمہ اٹھایا ہے۔ کیا سنی ملاؤں اور مفتیوں کی عقل کہیں گھاس چرنے چلی گئی ہے کہ ان کو یہ سمجھ نہیں آ رہی کہ درحقیقت صحاح-ستہ کے چھ ایرانی مصنف، شکست-خوردہ پارسیوں کی باطنی-تحریک کے چھ منافق تھے۔ گامے نے ماجے سے سنا، اس نے ساجے سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ٹماٹو سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ڈیزل سے سنا کہ اخری نبی نے کئی دفعہ خود کشی کرنے کی کوشش کی تھی (خرافات من منافق بخاری)۔ قران کی ایت ٦۸:۴ میں لکھا ہے کہ اخری نبی اعلی اخلاق کے مالک تھے۔ وَإِنَّكَ لَعَلَىٰ خُلُقٍ عَظِيمٍ۔ گامے نے ماجے سے سنا، اس نے ساجے سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ٹماٹو سے سنا، اس نے ابو-ڈیزل سے سنا کہ رسول نے کہا کہ نبی عیسی مینار پر اتریں گے اور اور پھر جاہل ملاؤں اور فسادی مفتیوں کی ایک فوج بھرتی کرکے ہر نصرانی کے گھر میں گھس کر صلیب تھوڑیں گيں، اور پھر دنیا کے سارے گنے کے کھیتوں میں خنازیر کو تلاش کر کے ہلاک کریں گے پھر کانا دجال ائے گا اور پھر فریک مہدی اترے گا اور دجال کو مارے گا ۔ یہ سب خرافات ہیں جو منافقین، پارسیوں اور زنادقہ نے گھڑ کر خاتم الأنبياء عليه السلام کے نام لگا دی ہیں۔ ابن-عساکر تاريخ-دمشق میں لکھتا ہے کہ خلیفہ ہارون رشید عباسی نے ایک زندیق کو بلایا اور جلاد کو حکم دیا کہ اس کا سر قلم کر دو۔ زندیق بولا یا امیر المومنین کیا اپ کو پتہ ہے کہ میں نے ہزاروں احادیث فورج کی ہیں جن میں ان چیزوں کو ہلال کیا ہے جو قران میں حرام ہیں اور ان چیزوں کو حرام کیا ہے جو قران نے ہلال کی ہیں۔

جناب: نبی، اور صحابہ کو فالو کرنے کا مطلب صرف قران کو فالو کرنا ہے۔ من-گھڑت کتب کو نہیں۔جو قران میں نہیں، وہ اسلام کا حصہ نہیں، ۲۸:۸۵ ٦:۱۹، ٦:۱۱۴۔

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِى فَرَضَ عَلَيْكَ ٱلْقُرْءَانَ لَرَآدُّكَ إِلَىٰ مَعَادٍ قُل رَّبِّىٓ أَعْلَمُ مَن جَآءَ بِٱلْهُدَىٰ وَمَنْ هُوَ فِى ضَلَـٰلٍ مُّبِينٍ

قُلْ أَىُّ شَىْءٍ أَكْبَرُ شَهَـٰدَةً قُلِ ٱللَّهُ شَهِيدٌۢ بَيْنِى وَبَيْنَكُمْ وَأُوحِىَ إِلَىَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانُ لِأُنذِرَكُم بِهِۦ وَمَنۢ بَلَغَ أَئِنَّكُمْ لَتَشْهَدُونَ أَنَّ مَعَ ٱللَّهِ ءَالِهَةً أُخْرَىٰ قُل لَّآ أَشْهَدُ قُلْ إِنَّمَا هُوَ إِلَـٰهٌ وَٰحِدٌ وَإِنَّنِى بَرِىٓءٌ مِّمَّا تُشْرِكُونَ

أَفَغَيْرَ ٱللَّهِ أَبْتَغِى حَكَمًا وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِىٓ أَنزَلَ إِلَيْكُمُ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ مُفَصَّلًا

ایک کامن-سینس کی بات ہے کہ اگر سیرت، فقہ، تفسیر، سنت، اسباب-نزول اور احادیث، دین-الاسلام کا حصہ ہوتیں تو خلفاء راشدین ان کتابوں کو ضرور لکھواتے۔ کیا مشکل تھی ان کے لیے ایسی کتابوں کو لکھوانے میں؟ کیا انہوں نے لکھوائیں؟ نہیں۔ تو، اس سے ثابت ہوتا ہے کہ سیرت، فقہ، تفسیر، سنت، اسباب-نزول اور احادیث کی کتب سنی اور شیعہ کی خرافات ہیں، بدعا ہیں۔ رسول کی صحیح سیرت/اسوۃحسنہ صرف قران-الحکیم کے اندر ہے۔ قران جو کہ سب سچائیوں کا سچ ہے جنت کی چابی ہے ۱۷:۹ اسی لیے حضرت عائشہ نے ایت ٦۸:۴ کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے فرمایا تھا القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

إِنَّ هَـٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانَ يَهْدِى لِلَّتِى هِىَ أَقْوَمُ وَيُبَشِّرُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ يَعْمَلُونَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ أَنَّ لَهُمْ أَجْرًا كَبِيرًاResponding to one YouTuber: @osamamaqsood9411

Seems, you have not read my comments under this thread which I posted in response to Sheikh Imran’s comments. If you read those comments, you will find answers of all points which you have raised in your comments. However, let I recap:
In your comments you have raised following points.
1- You need Hadiths to know about Prophet.
2- His Miracles
3- You posted that Islam is Quran+Sunnah.

Prophet and all Sahaaba left behind not a single page of stories of Sunnah and Hadiths. Sunni’s own books show that Caliph Umar burned and banned all hadiths, and he refused to write Sunnah of Prophet, and said: La Kitaab m’a Kitaab-Allah”. All stories of Sunnah and hadiths were written when Prophet and all Sahaaba were already died. So, no any Hadith can be classified as Sahih because Prophet and even 4 Caliphs certified no any Hadith as Sahih/Authentic. If not authentic, then is Inauthentic. And how can you know about Prophet through inauthentic stories? For example: one Sunni Hadith tells that Prophet used to snore like a Camel. God tells us in 68:4 that Rasool used to have the best sublime conduct but Bukhari tells that Prophet attempted several suicides. Quran tells that God is protector of Quran 15:9, 17:88, 41:42 but Sunni’s hadith books tell that verses of stoning are missing from Quran because any Sunni-Sheep ate those verses. Tafsir Burhan of Shia sect show that Quran has been corrupted. This means: Persian Shia and Sunni Pseudo Imams are telling you that a Sheep was more powerful than the Greatest-One who has sent down the Quran!

Truth is: A Muslim is absolutely not in need of to know about Prophet Mohammad PBUH more than what is given in Quran 68:4.

No any verse of Quran ordains to follow Sunnah of mortal man “Mohammad” 18:110, nor in whole Quran, term “Sunnah of Rasool” appears. This makes clear that term “Sunnah of Rasool” is concocted by Sunni and Shia sects. In Quran, only two types of Sunnah is mentioned, Sunnah of Allah Azza wa Jal; and Sunnah of bad people of past.

Quran talks about Oswat-Hasana of Prophet Ibrahim and Prophet Mohammad. But did Prophet Mohammad or 4 Caliphs or any Sahaabi leave behind any manuscript of Oswat-Hasana? No. But why did they not leave behind such manuscript? Was it not easy for 4 Caliphs to compile books of Hadith and Sunnah? Why did they not compile? Right answer is: they did not compile Oswat-Hasana of Rasool because God has incorporated authentic oswat hasana of Rasools within Quran. When you follow all ethical codes of Quran; then you automatically follow also Oswat-Hasana of Rasool.
For example: Quran tells in 2:42, do not tell lies and do not suppress truth. When you follow 2:42, you are automatically following Oswat-Hasana of Rasool because he also never told lies. Historically, he was known as Sadiq and Ameen. This is why: Aisha RA said: “The Quran is Akhlaaq of Rasool-Allah
القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله

The Truth of all truths “Quran” is the Greatest Miracle of Last Prophet,* and no any other miracle is mentioned in Quran about Last Prophet. Miracles are not the sole criteria to assess prophethood. Because in the era of previous nations, when people asked from prophet Miracles; even after seeing miracles, they said to prophets that you are magician. So even miracles could not convince disbelievers.

وَلَمَّا جَآءَهُمُ ٱلْحَقُّ قَالُوا۟ هَـٰذَا سِحْرٌ وَإِنَّا بِهِۦ كَـٰفِرُونَ

وَإِذَا تُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَايَـٰتُنَا بَيِّنَـٰتٍ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ لِلْحَقِّ لَمَّا جَآءَهُمْ هَـٰذَا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ

51:52
كَذَٰلِكَ مَآ أَتَى ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِم مِّن رَّسُولٍ إِلَّا قَالُوا۟ سَاحِرٌ أَوْ مَجْنُونٌ
Thus has it been (in the past): never did a Messenger come to the nations that preceded them but they said: (He is) a sorcerer, or a mad-man

Because Prophet, 4 Caliphs and all Sahaaba left behind only Quran; and Prophet was BOUND to follow only Quran 6:19, 6:114, 10:15, 50:45, 25:30, 28:85; therefore; after landing of Quran,

Islam=Quran, FULL STOP.

Any rite, Ritual (Namaz Pooja-Pot 2:177) and sharia law which does not have roots in Quran is absolutely not part of Islam.

During making Sharia law, to place man-made books beside book of Allah Azza wa Jal is 100% Shirk which Sunni and Shia have been committing from centuries.
وَمَن لَّمْ يَحْكُم بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ فَأُو۟لَـٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلْكَـٰفِرُونَYou have badly twisted his question. You have shamelessly compared apples with Jackals. Question of questioner is True, and that was only about Democracy. Shame on you for twisting the question. Fact is: Democracy is the most Irrational System ever shun on man. Even this system is rejected by Plato and Socrates in Republic. You are blindly following Pseudo Scholar Ghamidi who tells tons of lies

He failed to know that approach of Quranic Divine System is mainly Qualitative , but approach of Ibleesian System “Democracy” is only Quantitative. Quran stands with TRUTH, even if spoken by just one person among 7.3 Billions. Democracy has to do nothing with truth; as it stands with majority regardless if that majority is of even evil-doers. If a democratic parliament comprises evil-doers; they can permit to publish insulting cartoon of Prophet Mohammad under label of freedom of speech, despite GOD witnessed in his last testament “Quran” that Prophet Mohammad used to have the highest Moral and Ethical Standard. If Majority in a Society is of ignorant thieves; they can elect top-thief as their President. Yet Gamidi supports that Ibleesian system in order to please West.

Whenever we expose serious flaws (as given above) of irrational and illogical democracy; advocates of Democracy ask immediately, show us then alternate? Our answer is; that Divine System finalized in last testament of GOD “Quran” is not just alternate but the best system for mankind. Then opponents raise another question, how will you elect Members of Majlis Shoora? Our answer is; Supreme Court and Patriotic Army (the guarantor of State and Divine System) must not elect but select the best people of society. Because all the conflict is between two words “ELECT“, and “SELECT“. A feudal society in which majority of voters are Ignorant and Poor (sale-able voters); they could elect the Top Thief of this planet as President of Country, and a notorious Terrorist of this Globe as a Prime Minister. Then opponents, raise another point; how will you select the best, the pious, and honest people of society for Members of Shoora (Consulting body)? Our answer is; that from the day, when Adam was sent to this earth, to the day of today, every society knew well and knows well, even today, about the best people of their Societies. Throughout mankind history the best people were and are distinct in any society like are distinct Diamonds and Rubies on the pile of Charcoal. That the best people (always in Minority >> Quran 6:116-117) can make this earth paradise of peace and prosperity in the light of laws of Divine System which has been finalized in Last preserved and protected Book of GOD “Quran”.Do you not see, what Demo-curse-y has done in Pakistan? But by nature being a stubborn, still you support demo-curse-y. What is going on in Pak was predicted by Socrates and Plato 2500 year ago. Man of God >> Socrates said: democracy is IRRATIONAL SYSTEM in which vote is counted but wisdom and experience of Voter is not taken into account. Quran tells to consult, but does Quran tell to do Shura with Bandits and Chors? If you understand Quran (which you do not); then you must know that Quran never supports Chors and Looters for Shura. When Caliph Umar was selected as Caliph; did all people of Islamic Empire vote for Umar RA? No.

Your support for democracy is 100% illogical, nonsensical, and IrrationalPakistani Society was never and is not compatible with Democracy which is indeed Demo-Curse-y. If China was also following this kind of Demo-Curse-y, then, today, condition of China could have been like us. Analytically, democracy is Irrational System of Iblees which makes the Biggest Chor of millennia “MNS” PM, thrice; makes the Biggest Bandit of Century “AAZ” President Pak; and makes a Abnormal-Minded Extremely stubborn-Foolish Cricketer, PM, Pak. It is same system of Iblees which elected Hitler as Chancellor of Germany, and world saw 2nd world war.

Democracy counts heads of voters but does not scan heads of voters in order to know if in head of a voter, a healthy brain exists, or his head is empty of brain, and such voter can sell his vote even to a bandit just for a plate of Buryaani.

One of Plato’s book is “Republic” in which Plato has recorded discussion of his teacher Socrates. It is surprising that 2500 years ago what Socrates said about flaws of democracy; we are seeing those flaws in Pak. Socrates gave an example of Ship, where people on ship are asked to elect new Captain. Near people, criteria was who is tallest, and they elected that man who was not experienced in ship driving.

Mr. Gul: Was it not duty of PTI GOV and GOV of PDM-Mafia to stop drainage of USD to Afghanistan and Iran and through Sea ports and Airports (by Zerdari Mafia)? It was their duty but they were unable to stop that drainage. But now, General Asim has succeeded to stop that drainage.

So, question arises; why do we need that kind of Incompetent and Corrupt Democratic GOVS which can do nothing except Loot-Maar including Loot-Maar of Tosha Khana? It is much better that People like General Asim must govern this country.During translation of Quranic verse 3:55, Mr. Ghamidi has propounded a strange theory which is totally nonsensical and even contradicts other Quranic verses. Why has he done so? Its answer is: though Mr. Ghamidi beats drum that he is not a blind follower but his written material and his video-talks prove 101% that he is a blind follower. At many places it appears that instead of understanding a verse of Quran through Quran’s own built-in Tasreef, Mr. Ghamidi prefers his so called Ustad Imam Farahi or Amin Islahi. Fact is: though Ustad Imam Farahi and Amin Islahi were much better Mullahs than other South Asian Mullahs but they have also made several blunders, and Mr. Ghamidi is supposed not to follow them like a sheep follows other sheep. Mr. Ghamdi has written under verse 3:55 that after death of Jesus, Angels came and they took dead body of Jesus to God or to any unknown remote part of Sky. This is pure childish and moronic approach which shows that Mr. Ghamidi’s knowledge about history, Quran 7:143 and Metaphysics is very poor, and he does not understand even basics of Quran; nor he has a better commonsense. We all know that Mirza G A Qadiani was a false Prophet but Truth is: Quran in 4:157 never denies nailing of Jesus on the Cross but Quran powerfully reject crucifixion of Jesus on the Cross in 4:157. If we understand verse 4:157 deeply at micro-level then that verse indeed confirms that Jesus was on the Cross but verse say: he survived death on the Cross; means: he did not die on the Cross; and that means: he was not crucified 4:157 because according to all definitions of Crucifixion; death on the Cross is a binding condition of the punishment called Crucifixion. If person dies on the Cross, he is Crucified but If person is removed from the Cross when he was still alive (but unconscious), then that person is not Crucified. Later Jesus was treated by Essene (HawaariYoon 3:52), and Jesus was resuscitated. Later with his Mother, secretly he permanently moved to East, so-that Roman should not Crucify him again. Secular (not-Religious) historical evidence shows that Jesus died 5:117 naturally at age 120, and he is buried in Grave, and his grave and grave of his mother Maryam still exist today; and Mr. Ghamidi can visit those graves even today if he likes. We also read in over 30 ancient well-known books of Sunni sects that Prophet Mohammad told his daughter Fatimah that I will live half-life of Jesus because Jesus lived 120 years, so I will live for 60 years, and there are over 6 reports in Bukhari, Muslim, Muwatta, and Tirmidhi which show age of Prophet not 63 but 60 years. In Quran, word RAFA is used in several verses; and its meaning are to raise in honor/ranks or Spiritual exaltation. It never means: to raise alive or dead body of Jesus to God or to any remote location of Sky. Quran tells us that man is made of Dust and after death he returns to same Dust. Our team specializes on the subject of life of Jesus, and after about 40 years’ non-stop research on this subject, we have published following page which must be read and also understand by Mr. Ghamidi and his all Students and his all Followers with an honest and unbiased mind. Page is: The Best Scholarly Page on the life of Jesus – A treasure for the students of Comparative Religion. Please also visit our this page: Birth of Jesus in the light of Bible, History and Quran .

Just for reference, following picture is copied from Ghamidi’s Website “Mawrid“

Due to lack of knowledge in Quran and history; on this subject, here again, Mr. Ghamidi has mixed-up truth and Falsehood, and in this way he has violated 2:42. Answering some one about Jesus, his website “Mawrid” says (picture posted above): After death of Jesus, his dead body was taken to heavens. wow. What a nonsensical and moronic approach! Why is Ghamidi preaching so big moronic nonsense? He does so, because he wants to stick to what his Ignorant Teachers taught him. And to follow others blindly is a big Curse 8:22, 2:170, 7:179. Amin Islahi and Farahi were much better Mullahs than majority of Mullahs but partially, they were also blind followers of old man-made Tafsirs and many other non-Quranic books. They were fallible men and could make mistakes. Even Abu Hanifa told his disciples: Do not record from me any thing because I am mere a fallible man, and my opinion about something today can change tomorrow. And even Prophet Mohammad told Muslims referring to 18:110 that I am mere a man like you and can make mistake, so do not write from me anything except Quranic Wahi. Quran tells us in 32:11 and in many other verses that after death of Person, only Soul of Person is raised to God. Body made of Clay returns to clay. We ask Ghamidi: In which remote area of Heaven is kept dead body of Jesus? Is it kept in any kind of Freezer? Any address, street No or Postal code? Which airliner took his dead body to any remote part of heavens? How many Dollars did Airliner charge for this pretty tough task? This type of funny comic tales can come only from that Ignorant who does not understand even fundamentals of Quran nor understands that God is closer to man this his neck-vein 50:16. God is Omnipresent 57:4, 50:16 and God is not in need of dead bodies. Man is made of Dust and he must return to Dust only 20:55. Word Rafa of 4:158 is used also in many other verses of Quran, and whenever it is used for humans, its mean, to raise in Ranks/Darajaat and spiritual exaltation. Isa died like all other Prophets and was buried here on earth. We know: Mirza G A Qadiani was an Impostor and a false Prophet but there are tons and tons of multiple historic evidence which shows that the Person who is buried in RozalBal Kashmir is no one but Isa son of Mary. It has been also 100% Proved that People of Kashmir, Afghanistan and KPK Pakistan belong to 10 lost tribes of Israel. After failed Crucifixion, Jesus secretly immigrated to Kashmir to preach lost Tribes. Even we read in Gospel of Matthew 15:24 Jesus saying to his disciples: “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel”. Al-Biruni wrote: “Before 11th Century, entrance of only Jews was permitted into Kashmir“.

Prophet Jacob (Yaqub) had 12 sons, and from name of each son, there were 12 Tribes of Israel. After the death of Prophet Solomon, many tribes deviated from true path, and God punished them by sending Syrian Emperor Sargon-II in 722 B.C. who captured some tribes and took them into captivity. Again in 586 B.C., God sent Babylonian Emperor Nebuchadnezzar (Bakht Nasr) to punish them, and he erased their state to Zero and took remainder tribes into captivity. Much later; from twelve tribes; 10 tribes were deported to Afghanistan, Kashmir and KPK Pakistan. Only two tribes were left in Palestine; Tribe of Judah (Yahooda>Yahoodi) and Tribe of Benjamin (Banyameen>Real brother of Prophet Yousuf). Even after 2700 years, today we can trace easily names of Tribes of People of Kashmir, Afghanistan and KPK in old testament. For example YusufZai tribe of KPK Pakistan is from Tribe of Prophet Yusuf.Not just we have read it; but we have OBSERVED the state which is given in case 01 of above-posted picture; and we never post lies 2:42.Quran 39:42 It is Allah that takes the souls (of men) at death; and those that die not (He takes) during their sleep: those on whom He has passed the decree of death, He keeps back (from returning to life), but the rest He sends (to their bodies) for a term appointed verily in this are Signs for those who reflect. (Yusuf ali)

Quran 39:42 God takes the souls at the time of their death, and those that have not died during their sleep. He retains those for which He has decreed death, and He releases the others until a predetermined time. In that are signs for people who reflect. (Itani)

Quran 39:42 God takes the souls of the dead and the souls of the living while they sleep- He keeps hold of those whose death He has ordained and sends the others back until their appointed time- there truly are signs in this for those who reflect. (Haleem – Arab Professor)

Quran 39:42 Allah takes the souls (at the) time (of) their death and the one who (does) not die in their sleep Then He keeps the one whom He has decreed for them the death and sends the others for a term specified Indeed in that surely (are) signs for a people who ponder (literal)

Quran 39:42 God retrieves people’s souls at the time of their death, and the souls of the living during their sleep. He then keeps those for which He has decreed death and releases the others until an appointed term. There are signs in this for people who reflect. (Safi Kaskas > Arab Professor)

Quran 39:42 Allah takes the souls (at the) time (of) their death, and the one who (does) not die in their sleep. Then He keeps the one whom, He has decreed for them the death, and sends the others for a term specified. Indeed, in that surely (are) signs for a people who ponder. (literal word by word by Dr. Shehnaz)

Quran 39:42 It is God who takes away mens souls upon their death and the souls of the living during their sleep. Then He withholds those for whom He has ordained death and restores the souls of others for an appointed term. There are certainly signs in this for those who reflect ( by Wahiduddin Khan >> Biggg Mullah of India)

Quran 39:42 It is Allah Who takes away the souls of people at the hour of their death, and takes away at the time of sleep the souls of those that have not died. Then He retains the souls of those against whom He had decreed death and returns the souls of others till an appointed time. Surely there are Signs in this for a people who reflect (Mullah Maududi).

Quran 39:42   Allah takes away the souls (of human being) at the time of their death and (also) of those who are not (yet) dead during their sleep. He detains (the souls of) those against whom He passes the verdict of death and sends (back those of) others till a fixed period of time. There are signs in this for a people who would reflect ( Amatul Rahman Omar > Gold Medalist in Arabic Language).

Please note: That same above-posted Report of Darimi also appears in Tirmidhi 2906. If you can read Arabic, in Arabic text of above-posted hadith, words are very clear:  one Person is telling Caliph Ali RA “that People are engrossed in “HADITHS“. We have highlighted relevant line of Arabic text it in yellow color. In Arabic text of this hadith, plural of word “Hadith” is used which is ahadith which mean Hadiths. But because this hadith of Darimi, which is also given in many other books and in book of Tirmidhi too, drops nuke on hadithers, and clearly shows illegality of hadith books in Islam; so Saudi based Publisher Darussalam has deliberately twisted the English translation of Arabic word “Haadiths”, and has translated word “Haadiths” as “Stories“. Hadithers are Criminals. whenever any hadith or verse of Quran drops nuke on their false beliefs; these shameless, conscienceless, hypnotized, brain-dead Mushrik liars do TAREEF in translation of Hadith and verses of Quran. Tahreef mean tampering. After noticing tampering by Saudi Publisher Darussalam, we went to a site that contains largest online data bank of Hadiths. But we found, Mullahs of that site has also tampered translation of this report and also of all other reports that prove illegality of Hadith books in Islam. Sometime they have taken away whole hadith from their data bank which dismantle their false beliefs. Hadithers carry same DNA that is Carried by Priests who has heavily tampered Mark Mathew Luke and John in past 1900 years. When we see  hand written copies of that four gospels of 4th Century, we find, that are very different from Gospels of today. They have badly tampered Gospels. Hadithers are people of same Class. When faith of a group is based on not truth but lies; then that Group always tries to tamper the things in order to validate his false beliefs. When you are on Truth, You are not in need of any such tampering. Following picture is just one example of Gospel Tampering. There are thousands examples there. Many verses of Gospel of Mark that we read in gospels of today, are not given in Mark of 4th Century. Same is in John. After reading below: How Priests tampered Gospels, we are going to show you, in other picture with big red arrow: how Saudi Publisher Darussalam has followed footsteps of Priests, and has tampered translation of above-posted Report of Darimi.