Do Hadiths compliment the Quran? Do hadiths explain the Quran? Right answer is: Hadiths neither compliment the Quran nor explain the Quran, but truth is: tons of hadiths run counter to Quran. Prophet Mohammad, four Caliphs and all companions of Prophet left behind only written Quran. They left behind not a single page of Sunnah and hadiths. All books of Sunnah and hadiths are forged by Sunni and Shia Imams at that time when Prophet was no more, four Caliphs were died, and even all companions of Prophet (Sahaaba) were also dead, and there was no one ALIVE who could authenticate stories of those hadiths which we find in book of Sunni and Shia sects. In fact, tons of ancient books of Sunni sect show that during the era of Prophet and four Caliphs; there was complete ban on the writings of Sunnah, hadiths and Tafsir. Standalone Quran does its own Tafsir through its own built-in Tasreef because verses are interconnected like brain neurons, and in this way, Quran fully explains itself, and Quran is not in need of any other theological book. In order to have in depth info on this subject, please read our following pages.

True History of Hadiths and Sunnah

Hadiths run counter to Quranic laws and ethical codes

Hadiths Imams especially those who hailed from Persia were Zoroastrian hypocrites of Batni Tehreek.

In whole Quran term “Sunnah of Rasool” never appears. Then who did invent this term?

Biography the biggest narrator of Hadiths Mr. Abu Hurairah

How, why and when Hadith of flying horse “Buraq” was forged?

Quranic Salat has no any relation with five Namaz Rituals which were imported from Zoroastrians

Quran forbids sects. According to Quran, sect followers are out from the fold of Islam

In order to read much more; never miss to visit our this Main Content Page

41Quran54scorp16_116enoughPlease note: That same above-posted Report of Darimi also appears in Tirmidhi 2906. If you can read Arabic, in Arabic text of above-posted hadith, words are very clear:  one Person is telling Caliph Ali RA “that People are engrossed in “HADITHS“. We have highlighted relevant line of Arabic text it in yellow color. In Arabic text of this hadith, plural of word “Hadith” is used which is ahadith which mean Hadiths. But because this hadith of Darimi, which is also given in many other books and in book of Tirmidhi too, drops nuke on hadithers, and clearly shows illegality of hadith books in Islam; so Saudi based Publisher Darussalam has deliberately twisted the English translation of Arabic word “Haadiths”, and has translated word “Haadiths” as “Stories“. Hadithers are Criminals. whenever any hadith or verse of Quran drops nuke on their false beliefs; these shameless, conscienceless, hypnotized, brain-dead Mushrik liars do TAREEF in translation of Hadith and verses of Quran. Tahreef mean tampering. After noticing tampering by Saudi Publisher Darussalam, we went to a site that contains largest online data bank of Hadiths. But we found, Mullahs of that site has also tampered translation of this report and also of all other reports that prove illegality of Hadith books in Islam. Sometime they have taken away whole hadith from their data bank which dismantle their false beliefs. Hadithers carry same DNA that is Carried by Priests who has heavily tampered Mark Mathew Luke and John in past 1900 years. When we see  hand written copies of that four gospels of 4th Century, we find, that are very different from Gospels of today. They have badly tampered Gospels. Hadithers are people of same Class. When faith of a group is based on not truth but lies; then that Group always tries to tamper the things in order to validate his false beliefs. When you are on Truth, You are not in need of any such tampering. Following picture is just one example of Gospel Tampering. There are thousands examples there. Many verses of Gospel of Mark that we read in gospels of today, are not given in Mark of 4th Century. Same is in John. After reading below: How Priests tampered Gospels, we are going to show you, in other picture with big red arrow: how Saudi Publisher Darussalam has followed footsteps of Priests, and has tampered translation of above-posted Report of Darimi.

To declare any report of hadith books Sahih or Da’eef is subjective to personal opinion of Hadither-Mullahs, Imams and Fanatics. If any hadith goes against their any unsound belief, they will concoct some excuse to declare the report as Da’eef or munkar. From many types of their excuses, one is to find at least one scapegoat from the list of narrators of a certain hadith, and that scapegoated narrator will be declared a Liar or untrustworthy; but at the same time, there are big Mullahs who classify same narrator as truthful and trustworthy. Because above given Hadith 2906 from book of Persian Tirmidhi declares hadiths as Fitna; therefore; Tirmidhi and other many Mullahs has scapegoated one narrator Al-A’war and have declared him as untrustworthy. On the Contrary, two hugely big Mullahs of their times Ibn Kathir (in Faza’il al-Quran) and Ibn Athir (in Jamia Al-Asool) wrote: that some people hated Al-A’war only because they did not like what he has narrated in hadith no 2906 of Tirmidhi. They both said: Words given in Tirmidhi 2906 are the real words of Caliph Ali RA. Apart from this point; we also see, Arabic text of hadith 2906 of Tirmidhi is also given in Sunan Darimi, and Darimi is big dad of that all hadith Imams. He was teacher of Bukahri Muslim and Tirmidhi. In fact, if we assign any weight to historical crap; weight of Book of Darimi is more than Bukhari, Muslim, and Tirmidhi etc. This is why, we have started this page by quoting Darimi first of all. Maalik, Abd-Razzaq, Ibn Shaybah etc lived/born before Bukhari and Muslim. As per our opinion, their reports in their books have more weight than reports of Bukhari and Muslim. However their books also contains tons of concocted reports. Bukhari and Muslim contain tons of false and fabricated reports. In following picture is opinion of two hugely big Mullahs of past Ibn Athir and Ibn Kathir about hadith no. 2906 of Tirmidhi which has already been posted above.oswatIslam is a Deen; not Religion

 

Do Hadiths compliment the Quran? Do hadiths explain the Quran?

Gallery

Leave a Reply but Be ethical please & be specific & logical